• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Who is Tucker Carlson? Expose unveiled 6 days ago explains who he really is!

Tucker has found a golden goose and will keep doin what he is doing because there's good money in it.
 
My personal opinion? Tucker doesn't even believe the bullshit he spews, but he has found the format to high ratings, and more wealth, as he keeps bringing back viewers who want to own the libs. I have tried watching him on a couple occasions, just to see what all the fuss is about, but after ten minutes I have to move on. Nobody could really believe his nonsense, right?
Sounds like you tuned in with your conclusion already fixed in place.
 
Sounds like you tuned in with your conclusion already fixed in place.
Only people that don't believe in common sense and in clear clues that point to innocence or guilt are still open to "conclusions" being formed.

It is like being in court as part of the jury. You are shown evidence and your job is to make conclusions from it. Tucker has now been on public TV for 21 years and the amount of evidence as to who he is, is overwhelming. As such, your criticism of 911Sparky's post is ridiculous.
 
Not recognizing the States with the greatest big city crime problem are run by "libs" indicates looniness.
Yeah. I'd say 6 months of the vacant stare of the guy in charge who's famous for sentences that run on with no purpose or end, does tend to make for a pretty gloomy looking future.
You do realize that everything has benefits and consequences, don't you?

For example, do you know what country in the world has the LEAST amount of big city crime? It is North Korea. Their big city crime is non-existent. Do you want the kind of government that North Korea offers to be the one we accept here?

Freedom of choice does mean that more people will do crime but then again it also means more freedom of choice exists in those cities. Would you prefer less crime at the cost of less freedom?
 
Only people that don't believe in common sense and in clear clues that point to innocence or guilt are still open to "conclusions" being formed.

It is like being in court as part of the jury. You are shown evidence and your job is to make conclusions from it. Tucker has now been on public TV for 21 years and the amount of evidence as to who he is, is overwhelming. As such, your criticism of 911Sparky's post is ridiculous.
Jurors are present for the whole trial. Not a couple of times for 10 minutes. I shouldn't have to tell you that.
 
You do realize that everything has benefits and consequences, don't you?

For example, do you know what country in the world has the LEAST amount of big city crime? It is North Korea. Their big city crime is non-existent. Do you want the kind of government that North Korea offers to be the one we accept here?

Freedom of choice does mean that more people will do crime but then again it also means more freedom of choice exists in those cities. Would you prefer less crime at the cost of less freedom?
Crime is freedom of choice in your world. Sounds like something we should all encourage.
 
Crime is freedom of choice in your world. Sounds like something we should all encourage.

Endangering others’ health and life is not freedom. It is rude at best and actually criminal. It is not a personal choice.
 
Who is Tucker Carlson?

Here is a brand new expose (revealed only 6 days ago) on Youtube that tells you who he really is!



I have to admit I did not know Tucker Carlson worked for CNN from 2000 to 2005 and was let go because of low ratings and worked for MSNBC from 2005 to 2008 and was let go because of a controversy about racism occurred when Jon Stewart came on his show.

Tucker Carlson certainly has been around and on "all sides" of the coin.

What comments do you have about this rich kid?

He's a host of a show. That's it. If you don't like him don't watch the show. If you want him off the air because you don't like it good luck with that. I believe his show is the highest rated show in cable news ever. You don't kill your Golden goose.
 
He's a host of a show. That's it. If you don't like him don't watch the show. If you want him off the air because you don't like it good luck with that. I believe his show is the highest rated show in cable news ever. You don't kill your Golden goose.
This is not aboue liking or disliking Tucker. It is about his ability to be president, which is something that is being bandied around in a big way for 2024. I don't watch FOX news but even if I did, he does not affect my thinking at all. Nonetheless, if he was president, he could/would have an effect on me and I do not believe he is (or can be) presidential material.
 
Wrong. Being on TV wasn't what got Trump elected. Having policies and positions that the voter wanted got him elected.

No...the only "threat to American democracy" are those people who want to shut down free expression...you know, free expression by people like Carlson.

Somebody asked Rush Limbaugh to run for President once and his response was "I wouldn't want to take the pay cut".
 
Somebody asked Rush Limbaugh to run for President once and his response was "I wouldn't want to take the pay cut".
Tucker is rich and money is not a concern to him. Why bring Limbaugh into the conversation?
 
Crime is freedom of choice in your world. Sounds like something we should all encourage.
Are you crazy or blind-by-choice.

It is the Republicans that want to have an autocrat running the country. Autocrats do not believe in freedom of choice. It is their way or the highway. It is the Democrats that believe in Democracy, meaning they believe in the majority rule and I have yet to ever find a majority that does not believe in freedom of choice.
 
Jurors are present for the whole trial. Not a couple of times for 10 minutes. I shouldn't have to tell you that.
Hahahaha, Tucker Carlson and his show has been on for 21 years and for 60 minutes each day. That means he has been seen 458,640 minutes (not 10 minutes a couple of times). Heck, jurors in a trial don't even get 1000th of the information about the defendant that Tucker Carlson viewers get. I would be more willing to disbelieve a juror in a trial than a viewer of Tucker Carlson.
 
It has been years since I have owned or wanted a television. What little I have seen of Tucker Carlson makes me think about buying one.

I enjoy investigating different points of view. What I demand of a commentator is honesty. The lies of Rush Limbaugh have been documented since 1994.


When I do a Google search for Tucker Carlson I find a lot of hysteria about him. When I am trying to learn where truth lies on a complex and controversial issue, any appeal to emotion inclines me to give more credence to the other side.

So I ask: what has Tucker Carlson lied about? Please list several of his lies, followed by documentation from a credible source that proves that they are lies.
 
It's hard to get over guys like Trump and Carlson who preach hatred. Seems contrary to the best of US principles. But it sells, apparently.
Please quote several statements from Tucker Carlson in which he has preach hatred. Keep in mind that an uncomplimentary statement about a person or a group of people that is factually correct does not constitute an incentive toward hatred.
 
****er Carlson is one of the greatest threats to the republic. He has poisoned the minds of thousands, maybe millions of people with fully fascist lies that are so easily falsified, yet he keeps spewing them. These warped minds keep supporting the destructive policies that hold us back.
Please quote several "fully fascist lies" told by Tucker Carlson, and demonstrate how easily they are falsified. Keep in mind that just because he says something you do not like does not mean that it is a lie. Sometimes the truth hurts.
 
This is not aboue liking or disliking Tucker. It is about his ability to be president, which is something that is being bandied around in a big way for 2024. I don't watch FOX news but even if I did, he does not affect my thinking at all. Nonetheless, if he was president, he could/would have an effect on me and I do not believe he is (or can be) presidential material.
Oh he's not going to be president.
 
Hold us back from what? Socialism? Communism? One world Leadership? Turning people into Things?

Got anymore rightwing buzzwords to fearmonger us with?
 
Interesting how many who detest him are allowing him to live rent free in their heads.

Says the one with the huge-ass 'Beware of Biden' sig. :rolleyes:
 
I like him. Wouldn't miss one of his shows.
Why? Because he drives the loons loonier and makes 'em say things like "one of the greatest threats to the republic".
Gotta love the doom mongering he inspires.
Must be pretty effective.

And another conservative admits he's into politics for the trolling.
 
Back
Top Bottom