This has my vote for the all time, hands-down, worst thread ever.
A misspelled thread title, inane chatter from the left and right sides of the aisle, and in the end, nothing meaningful stands to be accomplished.
OP, you really seem like a nice person, but I would go back and flush this smoking turd of a thread right down the toilet, and perhaps start all over again with a more clean and elegant approach.
Thanks in advance!
:2razz:
if you have logic you can understand all of this... if you do not then you will have problems in all areas....
Oh my intuitions, education, and high IQ all add up to a high degree of logical, critical thinking skills.
I'm not concerned about that, quite honestly.
And please, do not take offense at my earlier (spot-on) bit of advice.
This truly is a very bad web forum thread, from top to bottom.
I see that the misspelled thread title was fixed, either by yourself or by a moderator.
Kudos on that.
(And you are welcome, by the way. I reported the misspelling earlier, and requested most politely that somebody fix the error.)
That aside, the thread is still an inferior one.
Allow me to detail the reasons why:
* An a.-to-b., side-by-side comparison of Hillary Clinton and GEN Colin Powell doesn't even make sense, as regards corruption.
Clearly, Hillary has an enormous track record of corrupt dealings and shenanigans, going back many years, while the good General is merely a run-of-the-mill political figure with very few black marks against his character.
* No offense, but your opening dialogue, the very first posting in this thread, was not well-thought-out, nor were your main points articulated very well.
* In very short order, the banter back and forth degenerated into the typical 'left versus right', partisan-political nonsense.
There is a conspicuous lack of intellectual honesty here, but rather mostly a lot of 'nanny-nanny-boo-boo, your side sucks' dialogue.
I repeat, there's nothing meaningful being accomplished here.
And I'm only looking out for your web forum reputation, by the way.
You should thank me, quite honestly.
Friends now?
if you have true logic you would then call for a very high logical thinking ability test for voters... if not you are simply a wannabe
if you have true logic you would then call for a very high logical thinking ability test for voters... if not you are simply a wannabe
the polls are showing trumps supporters are more wise than the hillary supporters
trump has the higher income supporters..... hillary has lower income supporters WITH EXTRA student debt because she has more college grads..... but its the income that proves who are the true wise ....
how long have you called for a very high logical thinking ability test for voters??? how long?? lets see if you are truly wise or a wannabe.... how long??? people can tell you i have called for this since i came here and nearly every dayI would support such a thing.
I would also support drug screening for potential voters.
And an IQ test for potential voters.
And of course, a photo ID for all voters, in every State.
But NONE of those things are going to happen in this touchy-feely-kinder-gentler 'welfare State' society.
We can both agree on that, can't we?
I would support such a thing.
I would also support drug screening for potential voters.
And an IQ test for potential voters.
And of course, a photo ID for all voters, in every State.
But NONE of those things are going to happen in this touchy-feely-kinder-gentler 'welfare State' society.
We can both agree on that, can't we?
you saying a IQ test proves low logic thinking ability and just a wannabe...
the part that voting requires is LOGIC.... there are 2 parts to the IQ scores.... one is memory and the other logic.... one can have a high IQ but a low logical thinking ability.... for voting that then takes the high logical thinking ability.... so you have no idea what you are saying
You seem to be rambling, friend.
That said, your typing with no regard for the rules of punctuation, grammar, or upper/lower case has me concerned;
How is your health?
Are you at risk of a stroke or heart attack?
Humor me.
Speak a complete sentence.
Raise your arms above your head.
Smile.
Are you okay?
Is there anybody in the house to check on you?
You seem to be rambling, friend.
That said, your typing with no regard for the rules of punctuation, grammar, or upper/lower case has me concerned;
How is your health?
Are you at risk of a stroke or heart attack?
Humor me.
Speak a complete sentence.
Raise your arms above your head.
Smile.
Are you okay?
Is there anybody in the house to check on you?
Powell didn't like the direction the GOP was heading at the time and stopped supporting their agenda, although he remains a republican.
He never played the race card as you say either.
He articulated his reasons openly to anyone who asked.
I support Mr. powell.
look close and you are about to see a 3 ring circus of corruption
LOOK close and you can see a 3 ring circus of corruption that is backfiring...... the clintons... colin Powell and ObamaAre any observations of racism valid, or are they all just "playing the race card"?
The only person more corrupt than Trump is his bromance partner Putin.LOOK close and you can see a 3 ring circus of corruption that is backfiring...... the clintons... colin Powell and Obama
the email leaks has exposed this corrupt 3 some with them coming together to push each others corrupt agenda
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?