• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

White supremacists remain deadliest US terror threat, Homeland Security report says

So that's a "no."

Will you condemn the NAMBLA child molesters? Joe Biden won't.

Legislating limits on speech is extremely dangerous. If someone advocated for lowering the age of consent from 18 to 17, for example, should we legislate that as advocacy of statutory rape?

Child molestation is disgusting and I find those who advocate it disgusting. The act of child molestation obviously should remain unlawful. It is not illegal to be a NAMBLA member (if that organization even still exists), and that should remain the case.
 
You're right, because ANTIFA and BLM are responsible for the riots.

There is no ANTIFA organization and I have seen nothing coming from the BLM organization that advocates riots/looting. This does not mean I don't condemn the individual actions of those who are part of the ANTIFA movement or BLM movement/organization. The reason I bring up apples and pinecones is because of what each side advocates. The left side advocates democracy and social justice. They are anti-racist and anti-hate. The right-side (the white supremacists, in particular) advocate hate. They advocate segregation. They advocate racism. Anyone, even our heroes have the potential to commit acts we have to condemn. That does not mean we should stop seeing the forest for the trees.
 
There is no ANTIFA organization and I have seen nothing coming from the BLM organization that advocates riots/looting. This does not mean I don't condemn the individual actions of those who are part of the ANTIFA movement or BLM movement/organization. The reason I bring up apples and pinecones is because of what each side advocates. The left side advocates democracy and social justice. They are anti-racist and anti-hate. The right-side (the white supremacists, in particular) advocate hate. They advocate segregation. They advocate racism. Anyone, even our heroes have the potential to commit acts we have to condemn. That does not mean we should stop seeing the forest for the trees.

You latched yourself to that lie...lol

 
Contrary to all the BS the cons in here would like everyone to believe.

Did white suprenecists kill an 8 yr old girl? Nope your BLM ilk did.
 
Scottish police don't wear uniforms?
I do notice you mention nothing of the link which by the way you doubted its varicity when told previously the Israeli police trained in thuggery trained thuggery to American policemen and women!
Of was t dictated to do so by aipac and your friends?
 
I do notice you mention nothing of the link which by the way you doubted its varicity when told previously the Israeli police trained in thuggery trained thuggery to American policemen and women!
Of was t dictated to do so by aipac and your friends?

The question was : Scottish police don't wear uniforms?

Your usual JOOOZ garbage was ignored.

The truth is most police forces wear uniforms that hearken to the past military or have been updated to modern military.

image.jpg

And weaponry often follows the same course.

The French police who took down the head chopper looked awful damn military.
 
Last edited:
I will repeat myself: "This does not mean I don't condemn the individual actions of those who are part of the ANTIFA movement or BLM movement/organization."

I wasn't saying you did. I was debunking your lie that ANTIFA and BLM had nothing to do with the rioting.
 
I wasn't saying you did. I was debunking your lie that ANTIFA and BLM had nothing to do with the rioting.

There was no lie. You point to an individual connected to BLM who called them 'reparations.' One person doesn't speak for the whole. Now, if BLM had it in their platform to promote looting and rioting then I'd condemn them.
 
There was no lie. You point to an individual connected to BLM who called them 'reparations.' One person doesn't speak for the whole. Now, if BLM had it in their platform to promote looting and rioting then I'd condemn them.

Yes, any claim saying ANTIFA and BLM had zero to do with the riots, is a mother...****ing...lie.

What makes it worse: you already know, it's a lie.
 
Yes, any claim saying ANTIFA and BLM had zero to do with the riots, is a mother...****ing...lie.

What makes it worse: you already know, it's a lie.

There is no Antifa organization. It's a movement. Some of those who adhere to that movement commit acts that are criminal and I oppose those acts. But there is no organization so no platform to condemn.

I have seen nothing from BLM's platform that advocates rioting and looting. Show me where it says their organization endorses those acts and I'll condemn them.
 
There is no Antifa organization. It's a movement. Some of those who adhere to that movement commit acts that are criminal and I oppose those acts. But there is no organization so no platform to condemn.

I have seen nothing from BLM's platform that advocates rioting and looting. Show me where it says their organization endorses those acts and I'll condemn them.

Doubling down on the lies? I guess you've comvinced yourself it's true.
 
Doubling down on the lies? I guess you've comvinced yourself it's true.

So you've got nothing. Move along, then.
 
Nothing but evidence that you're lying.

Lying about what? I literally said I'll condemn BLM if you provide evidence their platform promotes rioting and looting. You're so confident in yourself, so let's see it.
 
Pointing out that black criminal gangs kill more people than white supremacist isn't a defense of white supremacist.

"Whaddaboudizm" is ALWAYS a "defence".

It's a rather stupid and pathetic one, but it is one.
 
Answer the question instead of flinging more shit.

Do people have the right to defend their own lives, or are they obligated to die if attacked by child molesting democrats?

Interesting question. Now what are your responses to:

  1. Do people have the right to defend their own lives, or are they obligated to die if attacked by child molesting "Republicans"?

  2. Do people have the right to defend their own lives, or are they obligated to die if attacked by NON-child molesting "Democrats"?

  3. Do people have the right to defend their own lives, or are they obligated to die if attacked by NON-child molesting "Republicans"?

  4. Should "Democrats" be allowed to hire "Republican" women?

  5. Should it be a crime for a "Democrat" male to marry a "Republican" female?

  6. Should "Democrats" be allowed to teach "Republican" children or provide medical care for "Republicans"?

  7. Should "Democrats" have their citizenship rights revoked?

  8. Should "Democrats" have their constitutional rights revoked?

  9. What do you advocate as "The Final Solution to the Democrat Problem"?


Remember, Joseph Rosenbaum was a CONVICTED child molester.

And,

Republican Ralph Shortey, a former Oklahoma state senator, Trump's Oklahoma campaign chair to plead guilt to child sex trafficking

Republican Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert was indicted on federal charges of structuring bank withdrawals after prosecutors alleged Hastert had molested at least four boys as young as 14 and attempted to compensate his victims and subsequently conceal the transactions. Hastert eventually admitted that he sexually abused the boys whom he had coached decades earlier, and was sentenced to fifteen months in prison.

Republican Tim Nolan, chairman of Donald Trump’s presidential campaign in Kentucky, pled guilty to child sex trafficking and on February 11, 2018 he was sentenced to serve 20 years in prison.

Republican state Senator Ralph Shortey was indicted on four counts of human trafficking and child pornography. In November 2017, he pleaded guilty to one count of child sex trafficking in exchange for the dropping of the other charges.

Republican anti-abortion activist Howard Scott Heldreth is a convicted child rapist in Florida.

(there are more you know) so your point is - what?

Or are those merely cases of "But, but - but ... That's DIFFERENT!!!"?
 
Back
Top Bottom