• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every persons position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

White House proposal would ease FBI access to records of Internet activity

danarhea

Slayer of the DP Newsbot
DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 27, 2005
Messages
43,603
Reaction score
26,254
Location
Houston, TX
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
The Obama administration is seeking to make it easier for the FBI to compel companies to turn over records of an individual's Internet activity without a court order if agents deem the information relevant to a terrorism or intelligence investigation.
You know, when Bush was in office, Liberals went nuts attacking his attempts to increase illegal surveillance in America. Now that Obama is in office, I am hearing crickets on this issue, but to anyone who values the Constitution, this IS an issue. The Constitution is a sacred document, and not something for wiping your ass with.

Meet the new boss, same as the old boss. Voters, HERE is the hope and change you ordered. And, to you Democrats, why should you care about this issue, since a guy with a "D" after his name occupies the Oval Office now? Because, if you allow Obama to continue the government's assault on Constitutional principles, America continues down a slippery slope towards a dictatorship. A future president and congress, possibly Republican, possibly Democrat, possibly other, may put an end to the grand experiment begun more than 230 years ago by our forefathers, because partisanship became more important than patriotism.

when asked what kind of government we were going to have, Benjamin Franklin replied "A Republic, if we can keep it". This question, once asked of Franklin, is the burning question in today's times. Some questions are ageless, and some answers end ages. I dearly hope we find the right answer this time. We had better. It is staring us right in the face.

Article is here.
 
Last edited:

danarhea

Slayer of the DP Newsbot
DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 27, 2005
Messages
43,603
Reaction score
26,254
Location
Houston, TX
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
Looks like I am hearing crickets from the Liberals in this thread too. If Bush was in office, this thread might be 100 pages by now. Ahh, I get it. Obama is a Democrat, so he doesn't deserve the same kind of scorn that was heaped on Bush for doing the same, right?
 

Redress

Liberal Fascist For Life!
Moderator
DP Veteran
Joined
Mar 5, 2008
Messages
106,835
Reaction score
50,749
Location
Georgia
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Very Liberal
I missed it when you posted it. I don't like this, don't think it is a good idea, don't think it should be done.

You should have called out conservatives who supported Bush for things like this and see if they support Obama on it too. Fair is fair after all.
 

Jetboogieman

Somewhere in Babylon
Dungeon Master
Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 12, 2010
Messages
30,774
Reaction score
33,939
Location
Somewhere in Babylon...
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Bit by bit, our privacy in all western countries is being slowly eroded away.

This troubling trend has to be stopped, but I suppose its what we deserve. After 9/11 we were all too happy to give up parts of our civil liberties and privacy to "combat terrorism".

If we continue to subvert our own laws to "fight terrorism" then they won't need to destroy our countries, we'll do it ourselves. And one day we won't even recongnize anymore the thing we thought we were protecting.

Stop fear.
 

Civil1z@tion

Member
Joined
Jun 1, 2010
Messages
247
Reaction score
105
Location
US
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian
People need to wake up and realize this: their own governments have far more potential to harm them than ten thousand Osama Bin Ladens. Terrorists are murderers and we should fight them, but ultimately they are incapable of toppling the governments of the West. They cannot take over just about no matter what they do. I'm ok with devoting more resources and specialists to anti-terrorism intelligence but the tools we use to take down the terrorists should not be tools that can also be used to destroy the Bill of Rights.
 

danarhea

Slayer of the DP Newsbot
DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 27, 2005
Messages
43,603
Reaction score
26,254
Location
Houston, TX
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
I missed it when you posted it. I don't like this, don't think it is a good idea, don't think it should be done.

You should have called out conservatives who supported Bush for things like this and see if they support Obama on it too. Fair is fair after all.
I did when Bush was in office, but guess what? Bush is no longer in office. Obama is. Therefore, he is on the hot seat now, and he deserves to be there. After all, wasn't HE the one who said that things would change in Washington?

To be honest, if it wasn't for skin color, I wouldn't be able to tell Bush and Obama apart. LOL. :mrgreen:
 
Last edited:

Redress

Liberal Fascist For Life!
Moderator
DP Veteran
Joined
Mar 5, 2008
Messages
106,835
Reaction score
50,749
Location
Georgia
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Very Liberal
I did when Bush was in office, but guess what? Bush is no longer in office. Obama is. Therefore, he is on the hot seat now, and he deserves to be there. After all, wasn't HE the one who said that things would change in Washington?

To be honest, if it wasn't for skin color, I wouldn't be able to tell Bush and Obama apart. LOL. :mrgreen:
I was not talking about your calling out Obama. That is fine and I agree. What I am talking about is calling out those who agree with the second but not the first, but not the other way around.
 

rathi

Count Smackula
DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 10, 2006
Messages
7,890
Reaction score
4,730
Location
California
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
This is unacceptable. If somebody is a terrorist threat and you have even a shred of evidence, FISA will give you a warrant. If time is a factor and you can't afford the delay, FISA will issue the warrant after the fact. There is no reason why the FBI can't be bothered to follow the damn constitution and get a warrant. Its pathetic that the only justification for violating 4th amendment rights is that it is "faster and easier".
 

Crunch

DP Veteran
Joined
Mar 18, 2009
Messages
4,063
Reaction score
890
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
You know, when Bush was in office, Liberals went nuts attacking his attempts to increase illegal surveillance in America. Now that Obama is in office, I am hearing crickets on this issue, but to anyone who values the Constitution, this IS an issue. The Constitution is a sacred document, and not something for wiping your ass with.

Meet the new boss, same as the old boss. Voters, HERE is the hope and change you ordered. And, to you Democrats, why should you care about this issue, since a guy with a "D" after his name occupies the Oval Office now? Because, if you allow Obama to continue the government's assault on Constitutional principles, America continues down a slippery slope towards a dictatorship. A future president and congress, possibly Republican, possibly Democrat, possibly other, may put an end to the grand experiment begun more than 230 years ago by our forefathers, because partisanship became more important than patriotism.

when asked what kind of government we were going to have, Benjamin Franklin replied "A Republic, if we can keep it". This question, once asked of Franklin, is the burning question in today's times. Some questions are ageless, and some answers end ages. I dearly hope we find the right answer this time. We had better. It is staring us right in the face.

Article is here.
 
Top Bottom