Should we open criminal investigations into the Clinton/Gore administration's foreign campaign contributions from China, especially to see if they resulted in favorable policy?
I mean, after all, if laws were broken -- and these are serious allegations -- they should be held accountable, correct?
It's not facetious. It's a serious question.
If you say "no," please explain why.
Well, of course not.Should we open criminal investigations into the Clinton/Gore administration's foreign campaign contributions from China, especially to see if they resulted in favorable policy?
If you say "no," please explain why.
I don't know much about that China contribution information, but if it's true, is that really illegal?
I would say that its almost irrelevant now, and I have come accept the fact that candidates might or might not get outside contributions.
What the Bush admin allegedly did is way more serious and worth being given a full on trial.
So I would say no, was that contribution issue even confirmed?
Accepting foreign campaign contributions is illegal. What's worse is that Clinton pushed for and got Most Favored Nation status for China after that election, which could constitute a quid pro quo, and bump it up to the level of bribery.
So, it's possible that the President of the United States was, by bribery, under the thrall of a foreign power.
Yeah, I'd say that's as LEAST as serious as waterboarding some terrorists. :roll:
Was it "confirmed"? You need an actual serious investigation first. But it sure didn't look good.
What the Bush admin allegedly did is way more serious and worth being given a full on trial.
What if a President's staff of legal advisors deem that rape is legal? Is everything they say automatically correct just because they are lawyers?Hmmmm....Bush, for the sake of national security, implemented an enhanced interrogation routine that was deemed legal by his staff of legal advisors.
Three investigations could not conclude that, so I don't understand how you can be so certain.Clinton took campaign cash from China in exchange for military secrets.
Hmmmm....Bush, for the sake of national security, implemented an enhanced interrogation routine that was deemed legal by his staff of legal advisors.
Clinton took campaign cash from China in exchange for military secrets.
Oh, clearly what GWB did was sooo much worse.:roll:
But in that specific incident, there was a Justice Dept. investigation which resulted in 22 criminal convictions. There were also House and Senate investigations that pretty much went nowhere. Apparently they were unable to find evidence that Clinton himself was involved and/or committed any crime.
What if a President's staff of legal advisors deem that rape is legal? Is everything they say automatically correct just because they are lawyers?
Three investigations could not conclude that, so I don't understand how you can be so certain.
Should we open criminal investigations into the Clinton/Gore administration's foreign campaign contributions from China, especially to see if they resulted in favorable policy?
I mean, after all, if laws were broken -- and these are serious allegations -- they should be held accountable, correct?
It's not facetious. It's a serious question.
If you say "no," please explain why.
What if a President's staff of legal advisors deem that rape is legal? Is everything they say automatically correct just because they are lawyers?
Three investigations could not conclude that, so I don't understand how you can be so certain.
Good someone agrees with me. :mrgreen:
Dangit. Will a mod please add a yes/no poll? :doh
Moderator's Warning: |
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?