Which is a bigger threat to the USA radical islam or radical liberalism? (1 Viewer)

[Navy Pride]

Your comments please:

 

[Kandahar]

Don't be an idiot. This is no different than the "Who is worse - Bush or Hitler" type polls.

 

[ProudAmerican]

it can certainly be argued that radical liberalism is what will eventually allow radical islam to do the most damage.

 

[jamesrage]

Your comments please:

Thats like saying "what will kill you, a knife or a knife?".Both seek the destruction of the American way of life.One seeks to destroy us from within while the other seeks to destroy us from the outside.

 

[Navy Pride]

Don't be an idiot. This is no different than the "Who is worse - Bush or Hitler" type polls.

I did not hear you complaining when a liberal started a poll asking who is a bigger threat, Radcial Islam or Radical Christianity.........Can you say hypocrite?:roll:

 

[ProudAmerican]

I did not hear you complaining when a liberal started a poll asking who is a bigger threat, Radcial Islam or Radical Christianity.........Can you say hypocrite?:roll:

now thats a very good point.

 

[Stace]

How about an other option?

Such as, radical partisanship.

 

[Kandahar]

I did not hear you complaining when a liberal started a poll asking who is a bigger threat, Radcial Islam or Radical Christianity.........Can you say hypocrite?:roll:

Umm that was YOUR thread. And I voted for radical Islam.

 

[Captain America]

What's even worse for our country than the terrorist bastards is people like NP who constantly try to create division amongst ourselves.

United we stand. Divided we fall. And Navy's doing his best to divide. Who can deny that?

So which is worse? Ahab or Navy Pride?

I'm gonna go with Ahab because he can be taken seriously.

 

[Caine]

I did not hear you complaining when a liberal started a poll asking who is a bigger threat, Radcial Islam or Radical Christianity.........Can you say hypocrite?

This post... Followed by....

now thats a very good point.

Followed by....

Umm that was YOUR thread.

Gave me enough laughs at you rabid partisan lapdogs to last me a lifetime.

ROFL!!!!!!
:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl

 

[Captain America]

Caine, you can't put PA in the same category as NP. Hell, we can't put ANYBODY in the same category as NP.:rofl

 

[Caine]

Caine, you can't put PA in the same category as NP. Hell, we can't put ANYBODY in the same category as NP.:rofl

Umm..... can I request a sidebar your honor?

 

[Captain America]

Umm..... can I request a sidebar your honor?

How 'bout a Whiskey Bar instead?

 

[Navy Pride]

How about an other option?

Such as, radical partisanship.

Sadly there is plenty of that going on...........Here we have a nutcase like NK getting a nuke that could destroy LA or Seattle and the "Ice Princess" Hillary comes out and blames everything on President Bush when there is enough blame to go around for both sides..........

This should be a time when we are uniting and coming up with a plan....Instead Hillary is pointing fingers..................I don't know if the left understands how serious this is...........

 

[Stace]

Sadly there is plenty of that going on...........Here we have a nutcase like NK getting a nuke that could destroy LA or Seattle and the "Ice Princess" Hillary comes out and blames everything on President Bush when there is enough blame to go around for both sides..........

This should be a time when we are uniting and coming up with a plan....Instead Hillary is pointing fingers..................I don't know if the left understands how serious this is...........

Prime example of partisanship right here. You could have simply agreed, but nope, had to go and blame "the left".

 

[Morrow]

What is the point of this thread? So that for a few moments some people you call liberals will act the way you think they should, insult you, and then you can sit back and say, ‘I’m so glad I’m not a liberal.’ You can keep your ego, and your world view afloat, for a few more moments?

But three minutes later you’ll posting some stuff on another thread that is showing them liberals, the world, yourself, just how conservative you are. Just how military you are. That is what this is all really about, the image you have of how you think you should be and proving it to someone. Dont prove it, just be it.

Life’s not that complicated, but it does have more to it than evil rag heads and sinister liberals. I'm a liberal, and I'm not your, or anyone elses, enemy.

 

[WI Crippler]

Well I voted for radical Islam.

Radical liberalism just gets mad, and attacks your character when you disagree with them (despite their love for free speech).

Radical Islam will kill innocent Americans to get their point across.

But I do agree that radical liberalism is probably going to be the pipeline that radical Islam will use to try and destroy the U.S. Why wouldn't they??

 

[jujuman13]

Quote by NAVY PRIDE
(it can certainly be argued that radical liberalism is what will eventually allow radical Islam to do the most damage.)

That is your view and you are entitled to hold that view , you are also able to post that view, you have the freedom to do this by virtue of the thousands of people who fought for you to have that right.

Having said that, please note that no one has insulted you for displaying your thoughts (apart from classifying you as a Liberal), yet you on the other hand seem quite willing to describe anyone who posts a post that is in opposition to your view, as a traitor to the US.

I have no objection to a Democratic majority in the house and or Senate, in the same way I have no objection to a Republican majority in House and Senate.

What I do have an objection to is an authoritarian administration that rides roughshod over people with no thought of Partisan Politics.

President Bush came into his present position promising to be as inclusive as possible with his leadership.

Sadly he has failed.

Crime is out of control, I say this because the Ports and Airfields are run by criminal gangs, it was a proposal by some house members that this situation where murderers, thieves and indeed anyone with a criminal record be barred from being employed by these points of entry into the US.
It is also quite obvious that criminals will turn a blind eye to anything being imported if the price is right. That part of the Bill that advocated this was overturned by a majority GOP house.

His stand on International Politics is to say the least abysmal, he thinks that by bribing Pakistan with $billions, that he can purchase their loyalty, with the threat that should they not accept this "generous" largess, they will be bombed back to the stone age.

He has had nearly six years to repair relations with Iran, he has failed, no individual country or head of that country can DEMAND anything of another country.
So Iran is developing it's nuclear technology, let us be honest about this, Russia is in the process of building a nuclear reactor in Iran, this for the purpose of providing clean electricity.
Perhaps you think that Iran is not entitled to electricity from a nuclear plant, perhaps you think that Pakistan and India and Israel also have no right to have and operate nuclear plants (Oh, I forgot, those plants were built with American technology) so that is alright then.

We now come to that so called Axis of evil namely North Korea, we have some highly excitable character who is instantly recognizable as TOT who openly advocates that we use a nuclear Bomb on NK, what purpose that is meant to achieve God only knows, when it is pointed out that a radiation cloud would spread over our ally South Korea as well as Japan and China he seems to think that these folk would understand the US fears and do nothing.

I have a deep rooted objection to Radicals of any hew be they so called Christian evangelical Christians, so called hard right Republicans, so called left wing Democrats, Communists, Fascists, in fact any group that seeks to rule the US by (eventually) compulsion.

I voted that Radical Islamization is the more dangerous to both the West and US, but as I was denied the choice of saying both are equally dangerous I felt I was unable to correctly express my true feelings.

Radicalism means extreme views be they by Dems or Reps.

At the moment I feel that the US is in the grip of those with extreme views who are prepared to duck and weave around our constitution in order that they be allowed to do things that are disgusting, quite reminds me of what happened in Nazi Germany under A. Hitler or even USSR under Stalin, only difference at the moment is how far they feel able to go in destroying those freedoms Pres. Bush is so proud of saying his administration are defending.

I would remind you of one instance whereby a citizen of Canada was arrested at NY airport and illegally transported to Jordan in the ME where (presumably with US knowledge) he was further transported to that other country our President calls part of the "Axis of Evil" namely Syria, where he suffered torture for ten months before it was decided (Presumably by Syria / Jordan / USA) that was not in fact a terrorist.

I wonder perhaps naively under what part of our constitution our President was permitted to take this action against a citizen of Canada?

I dare say none of my questions will ever be answered nor will my queries about sending prisoners around the world to various other less salubrious countries (presumably to be tortured, else why ship them to other countries?) will ever be answered.

I agree that when Terrorists are caught they should be interrogated after which they should be tried for their crimes and if found to be guilty of killing people even if they are only acting as the planners, they should be executed.

I am not in favor of mollycoddling captured terrorists, but am in favor of absolute proof that they are in fact terrorists not merely folk in the wrong place at the wrong time.

If having a Democratic House and or Senate brings a sense of decency back to American politics then I would be in favor.

However I point out the two lines below this rather long missive.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Every elected Politician is a liar.

Most Politicians are corrupt.

 

[jfuh]

I did not hear you complaining when a liberal started a poll asking who is a bigger threat, Radcial Islam or Radical Christianity.........Can you say hypocrite?:roll:

Lol admission that you are a radical liberal? damn you have some issues dude. Now cut and run as you always do.

 

[jujuman13]

Below is part of a piece I wrote on another post.

Sanctions can be carried out in a variety of ways.

A mild sanction is merely a matter of words and is rarely listened to or acted on.

Good examples of these are Israel's refusal to accept the UN edicts, another instance is more recent, Hizbollah's refusal to give up it's weapons.

The next type of Sanction is usually an agreement between different country's to cease trading with a sanctioned country. Over time and with rigid adherence to whatever was sanctioned this can work. ie: Rhodesia.

Yet another form of Sanction (and this is what I personally think should be put in place) is a blockade of a country's ports, whereby any ship either enterring or leaving that Nation's ports is stopped, searched and if an ingoing or outgoing ship is carrying sanctioned materials then the ship and it's cargo are confiscated.

If China and Russia could be persuaded to adopt the last suggestions as well as China ceasing export of Fuel into NK, I feel it possible that this situation could be resolved without resorting to military methods.

Naturally China would find it essential to beef up her border security in order to prevent a mass migration from NK which if it occurred would overwhelm Chinese resources.

However whatever action is sanctoined by the UN, any delay in application of those sanctions leads the NK to believe it has got off scot free.

Speed of action is vital.

 

[Kandahar]

Below is part of a piece I wrote on another post.

Sanctions can be carried out in a variety of ways.

A mild sanction is merely a matter of words and is rarely listened to or acted on.

Good examples of these are Israel's refusal to accept the UN edicts, another instance is more recent, Hizbollah's refusal to give up it's weapons.

The next type of Sanction is usually an agreement between different country's to cease trading with a sanctioned country. Over time and with rigid adherence to whatever was sanctioned this can work. ie: Rhodesia.

Yet another form of Sanction (and this is what I personally think should be put in place) is a blockade of a country's ports, whereby any ship either enterring or leaving that Nation's ports is stopped, searched and if an ingoing or outgoing ship is carrying sanctioned materials then the ship and it's cargo are confiscated.

If China and Russia could be persuaded to adopt the last suggestions as well as China ceasing export of Fuel into NK, I feel it possible that this situation could be resolved without resorting to military methods.

Naturally China would find it essential to beef up her border security in order to prevent a mass migration from NK which if it occurred would overwhelm Chinese resources.

However whatever action is sanctoined by the UN, any delay in application of those sanctions leads the NK to believe it has got off scot free.

Speed of action is vital.

Rhodesia was a semi-democracy. Sanctions worked because there were enough citizens with some voice in government that were actually being harmed.

But a dictatorship like North Korea actually BENEFITS from sanctions, because it enables the dictator to keep his people in the dark about what life is like on the outside.

Also, there's really nothing left to sanction in North Korea. China is the only trading partner it has.

 

[doughgirl]

"It can certainly be argued that radical liberalism is what will eventually allow radical islam to do the most damage."


BRILLIANT

 

[ProudAmerican]

This post... Followed by....
Followed by....

Gave me enough laughs at you rabid partisan lapdogs to last me a lifetime.

ROFL!!!!!!
:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl

his point stands.

and you fit the bill perfectly.

claiming to be a centrist, and only attacking the folks that lean to the right.

rofl indeed.

give me one....just one link where you have chewed a leftists arse as much as you just chewed mine in NPs thread about a NK pre emptive strike.

JUST ONE.

and please dont act like there arent tons of rabid partisans on the left here that you could have jumped knee deep into......mr CENTRIST.

 

[Navy Pride]

Prime example of partisanship right here. You could have simply agreed, but nope, had to go and blame "the left".

I am sorry that the truth hurts Stace........I am just scared to death that the left might take over our government and far left radicals like Pelosi, Reid, and Dean will be running it......................To me this far outweighs anything that radical islam can do because I truly believe it will mean surrender on our part........

 

[Navy Pride]

"It can certainly be argued that radical liberalism is what will eventually allow radical islam to do the most damage."


BRILLIANT

Exactly the policy of surrender to radical Islam will not work......