Just so we are aware 100% of these standards predate the invention and implementation of capitalism. All these things exist where capitalism is weakest and the standards most common where it is strongest.
So I would argue it is capitalism not socialism that has brought these standards mostly through the creation of a plurality of wealth.
Are you saying that you are against the 8-hour work day?
I'll do you one better, I would be for a five hour 4 day work week. You know what would lead to that….capitalism and limited taxes though higher productivity, lower labour time demands, high skill requirements.
Are you saying you support child labor?
Previous to this most children simply died of starvation/poverty[still do in many parts of the world]. The ability to work and contribute to your family was a great opportunity. The fact most families now have the wealth and ability to support children from 0-23 in most case without them working is beautiful fruit of capitalism. If we go back though to were poor kids are dying in the streets of starvation because their parents are too poor to feed them - then yes in those circumstances I am for allowing kids who would like to earn their own living - the right and oppurtunity.
Are you against universal access to education?
I would argue the way most people are educated today does them a disservice, due in large part of "the universal right" . As for what pushed high literacy rates - that goes right back to capitalism and the creation of more jobs/oppurtunities for those with high literacy.
But let go ahead and slow that engine.
Are you against living wages via collective bargaining?
Living wages - no. Collective bargaining - yes.
In most unionized environments I am aware the cost problem is mostly management. This is however still a direct result of collective bargaining process as it attracts and maintains a certain type of management work culture [ bureaucratic ]. It also drives and encourages hostility by dividing the intreats of "labour" and interests of "corporate" divergent.
My biggest issue with unions though would be how they take money from working people and spend a lot on political causes with those collective funds that are not supported by those workers nor in their intrests.
So yes there have been some gains especially via fairer representation of worker received via unions. There are other positives too but nothing that wouldn't have come via other means . As for the net effect - most negative. Workers should have representation via ownership imho.
In terms of negativity seniority, for example, is a staple of a unionized environment. Seniority is a direct attack on meritocracy on which our success and wealth is created. You can't employ seniority and still have captialism. The engine of wealth and liberty.