Well, you sure would considering you think adoption is WRONG. looks like you'd like to force women out of adoption.
Only if the fetus has declared to be pro-choice.There is lots of talk about banning abortion after the third trimester or after the pregnancy has gone on for a certain time. Well the fact of the matter is this, as soon as the egg is fertilized its too late for an abortion.
Well, you sure would considering you think adoption is WRONG. looks like you'd like to force women out of adoption.
Only if the fetus has declared to be pro-choice.
Glad you represent the left.
Fetuses are incapable of making a choice. Hence, the reasonable thing to do is let the woman who has it in her belly make the decision.
No, I would not. I believe in each woman making the choice that *she* thinks is best. I don't believe in forcing my opinion on others.
lol...See the perfect example of the authoritarian mindset above.
No, Broh. It's your side that wants to force people to do something--like carry an unwanted pregnancy to term. My side wants to be sure woman have a CHOICE!
Always demonize the other side; that's the game. However, I want women to have a choice. I want them to CHOOSE to carry their baby full term. I want their choice to be life.
So lets say I've got a baby and I want to give the baby a permanent tattoo, since the baby is not capable of making a choice should I be allowed to do that? Not that I ever would.
So lets say I've got a baby and I want to give the baby a permanent tattoo, since the baby is not capable of making a choice should I be allowed to do that? Not that I ever would.
uh-huh. You already showed us your authoritarian lean. No need to double down in it.
I'm not "proposing" anything. The law is the law. But I do advocate for life instead of death. The hole being dug is the insistence that adoption is wrong. Doubling down on that idea makes that hole massive.
Born humans are protected by law. You know that. I'm not sure of tattoos. However, you are free to cut off a part of his penis.
It may not be legal. Permanent tattoos for babies are not recommended - risk of infection, reaction to tattoo inks, etc. & a baby's skin is very thin - so it may be a technical problem as well as an ethical one. A baby's immune system may not be up to fighting off an infection. In some jurisdictions, a tattoo for a baby might count as child abuse. & if that's the case, no legitimate tattoo artist is going to want to touch the baby.
Got something to back that up? Didn't think so. You got nothin'. But keep trying, I'm looking forward to watching you reach for thin air.
Well as this is an abortion board and not a circumcision board, to get into the circumcision debate would be opening a whole nother can of worms, but I will say this much there are movements to ban infant circumcision.
Well as this is an abortion board and not a circumcision board, to get into the circumcision debate would be opening a whole nother can of worms, but I will say this much there are movements to ban infant circumcision.
There is lots of talk about banning abortion after the third trimester or after the pregnancy has gone on for a certain time. Well the fact of the matter is this, as soon as the egg is fertilized its too late for an abortion.
Always demonize the other side; that's the game. However, I want women to have a choice. I want them to CHOOSE to carry their baby full term. I want their choice to be life.
No one has insisted that adoption is wrong, it's only a choice, and there is but one person with the right to make the choice we are talking about.
Adoption is wrong. You are asking women to pawn their children off on others to raise, to hand them over to strangers. Nope, not going to ever do it.
Then you accept the law and would not want to change it making abortion illegal?
And if the woman wants to do otherwise, demonize her?
Women now have a choice, allow them to make it.
As will you, I will go along with whatever the duly elected representatives of the people in this democratic country and our Supreme Court decides.
Since you wont ever be in the position to have an abortion, that statement is meaningless. And doesnt mean you wouldnt use your voting power to try and make changes.
So not ever being in a position to have an abortion disqualifies me from having an opinion?
Then you accept the law and would not want to change it making abortion illegal?
As will you, I will go along with whatever the duly elected representatives of the people in this democratic country and our Supreme Court decides.
Since you wont ever be in the position to have an abortion, that statement is meaningless. And doesnt mean you wouldnt use your voting power to try and make changes.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?