KidRocks
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2005
- Messages
- 1,337
- Reaction score
- 16
- Location
- right here
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
Paladin, meet KidRocks. He wrote the book on 'reaching'.Paladin said:even I think this is reaching.
Paladin said:I'm a dem/lib, I don't approve of Bush's handling of our Iraqi involvement, I have paid more in taxes each year since Bush was ushered into office, and I have real issues with Bush supporters who feel Georgie drops gold turds, but --- even I think this is reaching.
I doubt Bush remembers everyone who has been photographed with him. I know of several rep/cons who would wet themselves for a photo op with him (several at this forum).
I wish the media would get out of the attack mode and find something that matters.
ted
KidRocks said:Well then don't you think Bush's handlers (Rove) should of researched and found out if Bush had ever appeared with Abramoff in a photo-op?
KidRocks said:Seems a little suspicious doesn't it?
Paladin said:And do what? Delete the photos? O, yea, that would be above reproach! :roll:
Why? If this is suspicious, then Pres. Clinton being photographed with Pres. Bush I should raise suspicions among rep/cons about their hatred of the Clintons. And among the dem/libs about whether Clinton was the savior they proclaim him to be.
It was a photograph. No big deal. :mrgreen:
ted
KidRocks said:It's not the photo's it's about how the President's memory may soon be "unhappily refreshed"!
Paladin said:I still don't see how it's a bad thing?
I'd rather see an issue made out his appointing Gonzalez as AG. Or his original SecEd Rod Paige.
It is this sort of crap that makes the current dem party look foolish.
Let's find some issues that have substance, back them, and pound Georgie with them. Not this bs.
ted
KidRocks said:Nope, I don't think so, it doesn't work.
But issues like "swift-boat liars" does so I say fight fire with fire and damn the substance, let's attack the Repubs with their own medicine.
Keep up the "Culture of Corruption" theme, hit em with their own incompetent policies!
Ugh, don't stoop. No matter who wins the stupid partisan game, America loses in the end.KidRocks said:But issues like "swift-boat liars" does so I say fight fire with fire and damn the substance, let's attack the Repubs with their own medicine.
Keep up the "Culture of Corruption" theme, hit em with their own incompetent policies!
Binary_Digit said:Ugh, don't stoop. No matter who wins the stupid partisan game, America loses in the end.
No, but I posted something a few weeks ago about how the White House was attempting to gather up all the photos. Looks like they didnt get them all. Not only that, butPaladin said:And do what? Delete the photos? O, yea, that would be above reproach! :roll:
Why? If this is suspicious, then Pres. Clinton being photographed with Pres. Bush I should raise suspicions among rep/cons about their hatred of the Clintons. And among the dem/libs about whether Clinton was the savior they proclaim him to be.
It was a photograph. No big deal. :mrgreen:
ted
Paladin said:It's wrong. Period.
I'd rather stay above it. And I'd really like my party to stay above it.
Fighting dirty may be fun, but so is masturbating, and both end up being non-productive.
ted
White House Silent on Abramoff Meetings
Abramoff had "a few staff-level meetings" at the Bush White House, presidential spokesman Scott McClellan said Tuesday. But he would not say with whom Abramoff met, which interests he was representing or how he got access to the White House.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060118/ap_on_go_pr_wh/white_house_abramoff
aps said:Paladin, first, the White House said that Bush didn't know Abramoff, but pictures show that he must have known something about Abramoff. This does not mean that Bush did anything illegal. Abramoff was present at staff meetings at the White House. Also, are you aware that Abramoff raised $100,000 for the Bush campaign? Do you think that Bush wouldn't know someone who raised $100,000 for him?
I think it would have been fine had Bush said, "Well, I know him to some extent, but there was no money traded between us for any favors." That would be an honest statement. His denying that he even knew Abramoff appears dishonest. Also, McClellan refused to elaborate on what type of staff meetings Abramoff attended at the White House. What the hell are they hiding?
KCConservative said:Hey, I have an idea. Since the fake turkey scandal didn't failed, let's make this into one. One of these days, we're bound to find something to impeach him on.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?