- Joined
- Oct 18, 2007
- Messages
- 32,061
- Reaction score
- 21,046
- Location
- East Coast - USA
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
Nadejda Reilly, 51, told Pennsylvania State Trooper Bruce Balliet on January 7 that she was driving on a local route for several hours waiting for a "calling from God." When she saw a car driving on the opposite side of State Route 93, she allegedly "wanted to test her faith by driving through the vehicle," according to the affidavit.She then drove her 2017 Kia Optima into the opposing lane of traffic and struck the car, the affidavit said.
Snake handling as a religious rite in the United States, also called serpent handling, is observed in a small number of isolated churches, mostly in the United States, usually characterized as rural and part of the Holiness movement. The practice began in the early 20th century in Appalachia and plays only a small part in the church service. Participants are Holiness, Pentecostals, Charismatics, or other evangelicals.
Woman drove into oncoming traffic to "test her faith," police say - CNN
She's lucky she didn't kill anyone.
I hope at the very least, quite a few months of mandatory, round-the-clock psychological help is required.
Woman drove into oncoming traffic to "test her faith," police say - CNN
She's lucky she didn't kill anyone.
I hope at the very least, quite a few months of mandatory, round-the-clock psychological help is required.
That is biblical **** right there, for true believers only. Pretend Christians need not apply.
Mark 16:17-18
And these signs will accompany those who believe: In my name they will drive out demons; they will speak in new tongues;
They will pick up snakes with their hands; and when they drink deadly poison, it will not hurt them at all; they will place their hands on sick people, and they will get well."
When their faith is put to the test, those who don't believe develop bone spurs.
First, it should be noted that almost all Bible scholars agree that these verses were not originally part of Mark’s Gospel. “The doubtful genuineness of Mk 16 verses 9-20 makes it unwise to build a doctrine or base an experience on them (especially vv. Mk 16:16-18),” points out noted commentator Charles Ryrie. However, those who handle snakes in their worship are not often impressed by what Bible scholars think of the genuineness of Mark 16:9-20. The verses are in the King James Bible, which is the only Bible most of them trust, and for them that is the end of the matter.
But even if these verses were authentic, they do not command the handling of serpents or the drinking of poison, and they say nothing of fire. So they cannot be read as a requirement for worship. In fact, the apostle Paul did encounter a serpent on the island of Malta (Melita, KJ) but only by accident because it was in a bundle of sticks he was laying on a fire. Although Paul was bitten and was divinely protected from harm, he did not pass the viper around for others to hold. Instead, he “shook off the beast into the fire.” Far from feeling a burning pain as modern snake handlers do, he “felt no harm.”—Acts 28:3-6, KJ.
If you have anything to say, say it here, in this forum, where we are discussing the issues. I quoted the bible where it states that those who believe can drink poison and live.
and when they drink deadly poison, it will not hurt them at all;
Of course, pretend Christians will quickly develop a bad case of bone spurs and come up with excuses.
Not being a part of original transcripts is not an excuse, it is a fact...:roll:
Original transcripts? There are NO known original transcripts of the bible, or any part of it.
Sorry, manuscripts...in case you missed it the 1st time around..."it should be noted that almost all Bible scholars agree that these verses were not originally part of Mark’s Gospel. “The doubtful genuineness of Mk 16 verses 9-20 makes it unwise to build a doctrine or base an experience on them (especially vv. Mk 16:16-18),” points out noted commentator Charles Ryrie."
Well that certainly raises some interesting points, doesn't it. We're right back to where we were 6 months ago, but now you've admitted a crack in your dam. Thank you for that.
If Jesus allows fake words to be put into His book, what is your methodology for deciding which of the rest of the words are fake, and which aren't?
FWIW, those scriptures are omitted in the NWT for that very reason, as are John 8:1-11...
I have no problem with religion as long as it stays out of government and doesn't harm others. This fails the test.
If you have anything to say, say it here, in this forum, where we are discussing the issues. I quoted the bible where it states that those who believe can drink poison and live.
and when they drink deadly poison, it will not hurt them at all;
Of course, pretend Christians will quickly develop a bad case of bone spurs and come up with excuses.
When crazy and religion get together, you get the gop?
When you do silly math, you get silly statements.
Woop-tee-doo. You have said Jesus allows fake words to be put into His book. What is your methodology for deciding which words in His book, the bible, are fake, and which are real?
Wouldn't that go against her freedom of religion? She's actually doing more than paying lip service to her beliefs, finding her way to heaven in the quickest possible manner.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?