No no, AVID was actively involved in nonlinear even as far back as the late 80's.
But as you said, linear videotape editing was still very dominant and nonlinear was struggling with computer design limitations for a while. Apple had good hardware stock but so did HP, with enterprise grade WindowsNT systems, and NT was not plagued with the consumer demons we got slapped with during Win98, Me, etc.
But still, processor speed and available RAM limitations, together with the tiny hard drives of the era, kept nonlinear a novelty for all but the most well heeled specialty productions for some time.
AVID started on the Macintosh II as offline only in 1989, the picture output wasn't good enough (
ultra low resolution) for broadcast yet, but you wound up with a perfect EDL for online assembly, be it film or video, because AVID worked with film keycode numbers right from the start so it's not like the negative cutters noticed any difference.
Videotape stopped being cut and spliced (
EdiVue)* in the late 1960's when Eeco's On Time Telemetry Management system used by NASA was adapted to run a proprietary type of time code, and SMPTE came up with the universally accepted SMPTE time code soon after. The Quadrature 2-inch VTR's got adapted to work with time code and thus finally became frame accurate.
There was a bizarre interim period before Eeco where they were using a "cue track" but it was nowhere near accurate so one might describe it as a form of "crash editing" done "kitchen table style" and it really was the Space Race that helped usher videotape into fully electronic frame accurate machine to machine editing thanks to both Eeco and some stubborn SMPTE engineers.
I made my bones on the early AVID, which is part of the reason why I never glommed onto that whole Final Cut fad. Yeah, Final Cut was a good editor but I disliked that whole snotty attitude that came with it because I'd been fiddling with computer based nonlinear before Final Cut even existed.
Did you know that the guy who WROTE the Final Cut program was the same guy who wrote Adobe Premiere?
Randy Ubillos
Before Apple acquired Final Cut, it was a Macromedia product called "Key Grip", a name which made no sense since a key grip usually fiddles with lights.
*They also experimented with using a tape head instead of EdiVue solution/microscope, and the control track pulse made a distinctive sound that aided positioning of the splice point.
"An alternative to the traditional Smith Splicer, replaced the microscope with an oscilloscope and two magnetic pickup heads.
These heads are located so they "read" the edit pulse on either side of the splice.
The tape was then positioned, so that the trace was in the center of the scope.
This located the spot on the tape where the cut was to be made.
This technique eliminated the need to develop the tape, and to some extent, reduced the amount of tape handling required in making the spice.
Note: The greatest danger in tape handling, is the likelihood of creating dropouts."
Ummm, the OTHER greatest danger was the fact that spliced videotape does not live long when subjected to a quadrature video head spinning at 14,400 (for 960 recorded stripes per second) rpm for
NTSC 525 lines/30fps-standard quad decks, and at 15,000 (for 1,000 stripes per second) rpm for those using the
PAL 625 lines/25fps video standard...in a direction perpendicular to the tape path travel.
View attachment 67344219