What's worse for you Trump supporters: A fair election where Trump lost or defeating a Democratic Conspiracy where Trump wins?

[American]

Here's one transcript...

https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/11/Transcript.pdf

Is that your proof that Trump lawyers believe there's no fraud at all?

 

[Cardinal]

Is that your proof that Trump lawyers believe there's no fraud at all?

Here's another transcript, once again alleging no fraud...

 

[American]

Here's another transcript, once again alleging no fraud...

View attachment 67305930

So he's not calling it fraud, but that doesn't mean it isn't. Questioning an error of law may be merely another angle to achieving the same thing. The courts are packed with liberals, so they have to proceed accordingly. Don't forget that every single change in voting laws by any of the states by a judge or anyone else outside the legislature is UNCONSTITUTIONAL. That's a fact, and is clearly stated in Article I, Section 4 of the Constitution.

 

[Cardinal]

So he's not calling it fraud, but that doesn't mean it isn't. Questioning an error of law may be merely another angle to achieving the same thing. The courts are packed with liberals, so they have to proceed accordingly. Don't forget that every single change in voting laws by any of the states by a judge or anyone else outside the legislature is UNCONSTITUTIONAL. That's a fact, and is clearly stated in Article I, Section 4 of the Constitution.

Here's yet another transcript. This is in Bucks County, PA, in which Trump's lawyers agree to a joint stipulation saying there is no fraud.

 

[SMTA]

You’re playing word games. Can you point to any legal proceeding where either side divulged their evidence before trial?

Seriously!?
Look up Discovery as related to the law.

 

[Cardinal]

You’re playing word games. Can you point to any legal proceeding where either side divulged their evidence before trial?

Seriously!?
Look up Discovery as related to the law.

 

[Bullseye]

Seriously!?
Look up Discovery as related to the law.

We’re far from discovery at this point.

 

[Cardinal]

We’re far from discovery at this point.

You're as far from discovery as you want to be if your goal is to lose cases.

 

[SMTA]

So he's not calling it fraud, but that doesn't mean it isn't. Questioning an error of law may be merely another angle to achieving the same thing. The courts are packed with liberals, so they have to proceed accordingly. Don't forget that every single change in voting laws by any of the states by a judge or anyone else outside the legislature is UNCONSTITUTIONAL. That's a fact, and is clearly stated in Article I, Section 4 of the Constitution.

What an absolutely stupid response.
1) prove 'courts are packed with liberals'.
2) prove that every change in State voting laws is unconstitutional.

 

[Cardinal]

What an absolutely stupid response.
1) prove 'courts are packed with liberals'.
2) prove that every change in State voting laws is unconstitutional.

Which ignores the most fascinating point of his post, which is that courts being "packed with liberals" somehow compels Trump's lawyers to claim under penalty of perjury that there's no election fraud.

 

[SMTA]

We’re far from discovery at this point.

Which shows that you were far from being right

 

[SMTA]

Which ignores the most fascinating point of his post, which is that courts being "packed with liberals" somehow compels Trump's lawyers to claim under penalty of perjury that there's no election fraud.

And there was only bullshit with no evidence.

 

[Bullseye]

Which shows that you were far from being right

Nonsense.

 

[SMTA]

Nonsense.

Bwaahaahaahaahaa!
Discovery = evidence before trial.
You got bested.

 

[Bullseye]

Bwaahaahaahaahaa!
Discovery = evidence before trial.
You got bested.

What the hell are you blathering about? Everything I said assumes PRE-discovery -

 

[Jetboogieman]

So he's not calling it fraud, but that doesn't mean it isn't. Questioning an error of law may be merely another angle to achieving the same thing. The courts are packed with liberals, so they have to proceed accordingly. Don't forget that every single change in voting laws by any of the states by a judge or anyone else outside the legislature is UNCONSTITUTIONAL. That's a fact, and is clearly stated in Article I, Section 4 of the Constitution.

I like the part where you pretend to be a constitutionalist.

 

[SMTA]

What the hell are you blathering about? Everything I said assumes PRE-discovery -

Backpedaling bullshit.
Keep squirming and writhing.

 

[Bullseye]

Backpedaling bullshit.
Keep squirming and writhing.

Learn to read.