- Joined
- Mar 11, 2006
- Messages
- 96,099
- Reaction score
- 33,416
- Location
- SE Virginia
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Is that your proof that Trump lawyers believe there's no fraud at all?Here's one transcript...
Is that your proof that Trump lawyers believe there's no fraud at all?Here's one transcript...
Is that your proof that Trump lawyers believe there's no fraud at all?
So he's not calling it fraud, but that doesn't mean it isn't. Questioning an error of law may be merely another angle to achieving the same thing. The courts are packed with liberals, so they have to proceed accordingly. Don't forget that every single change in voting laws by any of the states by a judge or anyone else outside the legislature is UNCONSTITUTIONAL. That's a fact, and is clearly stated in Article I, Section 4 of the Constitution.
So he's not calling it fraud, but that doesn't mean it isn't. Questioning an error of law may be merely another angle to achieving the same thing. The courts are packed with liberals, so they have to proceed accordingly. Don't forget that every single change in voting laws by any of the states by a judge or anyone else outside the legislature is UNCONSTITUTIONAL. That's a fact, and is clearly stated in Article I, Section 4 of the Constitution.
Seriously!?You’re playing word games. Can you point to any legal proceeding where either side divulged their evidence before trial?
You’re playing word games. Can you point to any legal proceeding where either side divulged their evidence before trial?
Seriously!?
Look up Discovery as related to the law.
We’re far from discovery at this point.Seriously!?
Look up Discovery as related to the law.
We’re far from discovery at this point.
What an absolutely stupid response.So he's not calling it fraud, but that doesn't mean it isn't. Questioning an error of law may be merely another angle to achieving the same thing. The courts are packed with liberals, so they have to proceed accordingly. Don't forget that every single change in voting laws by any of the states by a judge or anyone else outside the legislature is UNCONSTITUTIONAL. That's a fact, and is clearly stated in Article I, Section 4 of the Constitution.
What an absolutely stupid response.
1) prove 'courts are packed with liberals'.
2) prove that every change in State voting laws is unconstitutional.
Which shows that you were far from being rightWe’re far from discovery at this point.
And there was only bullshit with no evidence.Which ignores the most fascinating point of his post, which is that courts being "packed with liberals" somehow compels Trump's lawyers to claim under penalty of perjury that there's no election fraud.
Nonsense.Which shows that you were far from being right
Bwaahaahaahaahaa!Nonsense.
What the hell are you blathering about? Everything I said assumes PRE-discovery -Bwaahaahaahaahaa!
Discovery = evidence before trial.
You got bested.
So he's not calling it fraud, but that doesn't mean it isn't. Questioning an error of law may be merely another angle to achieving the same thing. The courts are packed with liberals, so they have to proceed accordingly. Don't forget that every single change in voting laws by any of the states by a judge or anyone else outside the legislature is UNCONSTITUTIONAL. That's a fact, and is clearly stated in Article I, Section 4 of the Constitution.
Backpedaling bullshit.What the hell are you blathering about? Everything I said assumes PRE-discovery -
Learn to read.Backpedaling bullshit.
Keep squirming and writhing.