- Joined
- Aug 15, 2018
- Messages
- 22,368
- Reaction score
- 16,182
- Location
- PNW
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
You have just eloquently demonstrated the very conservative compositional fallacy I am talking about here.A lot of educators are morons. Why haven't we had a K-12 National Recommend Reading List for decades?
I had to explain to a high school teacher that a 9 kilometer wall was impossible. It must have been meters. The book did say meters.
Great Zimbabwe - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
I asked a half-dozen high school teachers about Project Gutenberg. Only one had heard of it and she had not told her students about it.
Educators want students dependent on educators. An excellent book is better than a mediocre book used by a mediocre teacher.
Some educators certainly are "morons." Most are not. Most are good at their jobs and use curricula designed by people even more educated and better at their jobs than they are.
What this fallacy ultimately amounts to is: "Because every scientist, medical professional, educator, etc. makes mistakes, statistical outliers are as likely to be correct as the majority scientific/medical/educational consensus." This is false statement. That it is remotely possible that the majority consensus is wrong does not make it in any way likely. It takes strong evidence to support the position that a consensus of professionals are wrong about their specialty, and simple personal discomfort with the consensus is not strong evidence.