- Joined
- Nov 10, 2016
- Messages
- 14,607
- Reaction score
- 9,303
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Trump and the GOP want to investigate the leaks and the Dems want to investigate the Russian's hacking and who in Trump's campaign were communicating with the Russian's during the election. So do we investigate one or the other or both? And if just one, which one?
Trump and the GOP want to investigate the leaks and the Dems want to investigate the Russian's hacking and who in Trump's campaign were communicating with the Russian's during the election. So do we investigate one or the other or both? And if just one, which one?
Trump and the GOP want to investigate the leaks and the Dems want to investigate the Russian's hacking and who in Trump's campaign were communicating with the Russian's during the election. So do we investigate one or the other or both? And if just one, which one?
Trump and the GOP want to investigate the leaks and the Dems want to investigate the Russian's hacking and who in Trump's campaign were communicating with the Russian's during the election. So do we investigate one or the other or both? And if just one, which one?
Trump and the GOP want to investigate the leaks and the Dems want to investigate the Russian's hacking and who in Trump's campaign were communicating with the Russian's during the election. So do we investigate one or the other or both? And if just one, which one?
Trump and the GOP want to investigate the leaks and the Dems want to investigate the Russian's hacking and who in Trump's campaign were communicating with the Russian's during the election. So do we investigate one or the other or both? And if just one, which one?
The investigation into Trump and his campaign's ties to Russia must come first. After we know the nature of those relationships we can determine whether or not the leaks come from a partisan warrior or a genuine American hero.
I cannot agree. Leaks in government should be always be identified and prosecuted. If we want people in government to have an outlet to bring to attention, what they believe tobe illegal, we should create a method of doing so without doing damage, if they err.
Russians hacked a private entity. Given the leaks on flynn, if they had anything on trump they would have released it.
Leaks came from the deep state, that's a crime committed by government officials to undermine the democratically elected president. There is a name for that...
Sure... they are called "conspiracy theories".
So you don't think it was the NSA or someone from the intelligence community who leaked the information?
I have no idea. As I said... a complete investigation into Trump and his campaign's ties to Russia will expose all sources of information. Otherwise you are just guessing...
So no investigation into who in the deep state leaked classified information in an attempt to undermine a democratically elected president? Seriously?
Like I said... there is a proper order to things. A full investigation of Trump and his campaign's ties to Russia will expose all sources.
You should be arguing for that.
I see no reason Why they can't be investigated at the same time.
Besides politics and trying to make up excuses for Hillary's humiliating loss in the election why would you say we should hunt Unicorns first looking for a maybe possibly depending on what is really is connection between Trump directing his underlings to conduct business on his behalf. Verse a verifiable case that without a doubt laws got broken by leaking information.
Russians hacked a private entity. Given the leaks on flynn, if they had anything on trump they would have released it.
Leaks came from the deep state, that's a crime committed by government officials to undermine the democratically elected president. There is a name for that...
Are you having reading comprehension problems?
You forgot the question mark in whatever question you were trying to ask, bro.
Trump and the GOP want to investigate the leaks and the Dems want to investigate the Russian's hacking and who in Trump's campaign were communicating with the Russian's during the election. So do we investigate one or the other or both? And if just one, which one?
?
There is one you can stick anyplace you like.
Why investigate a possible crime first instead of at the same time as a known crime???? Your position is one of possible takes priority over known, sis.
Trump and the GOP want to investigate the leaks and the Dems want to investigate the Russian's hacking and who in Trump's campaign were communicating with the Russian's during the election. So do we investigate one or the other or both? And if just one, which one?
Sorry, this one is not going away, investigate now.
Are you having reading comprehension problems?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?