• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

What is your religion? Just a short poll

What is your religion?

  • Catholic

    Votes: 9 9.5%
  • Protestant

    Votes: 9 9.5%
  • Eastern Orthodox

    Votes: 2 2.1%
  • another Christian denomination

    Votes: 3 3.2%
  • Muslim

    Votes: 1 1.1%
  • Jew

    Votes: 2 2.1%
  • Hindu

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Buddhist

    Votes: 3 3.2%
  • another religion

    Votes: 8 8.4%
  • no religion

    Votes: 58 61.1%

  • Total voters
    95
"Atheist" implies a firmness of belief which most "agnostics" do not feel. Stop trying to make people pick sides.
You guys are so bad. Now you think there are sides.
 
No. I think narrowing my perspective to a reality where there is a god or not is almost not worth considering.
A+ theism literally means a lack of theism or theological beliefs, in the same way that A + sexual means a lack if sexual means of reproduction.

Agnostics, by definition, hold no theological beliefs.

Therefore agnostics are athiests.
 
A+ theism literally means a lack of theism or theological beliefs, in the same way that A + sexual means a lack if sexual means of reproduction.

Agnostics, by definition, hold no theological beliefs.

Therefore agnostics are athiests.
I won't joke. That argument on either side does not span a single page.
 
I was thinking of joining the Jedi religion. But since I lack Force powers, that idea didn't work. Lol
 
Here's what I get from all of the responses to the question. Some folks believe in a god, some folks aren't sure if they believe there is a god and some folks reject the idea of a god out of hand which is my personal belief.

Who really cares? Is there any point to make about what a person believes or doesn't believe? I can say this, as an atheist, I promise I will never knock on your door trying to talk you out of your god beliefs.
 
"Atheist" implies a firmness of belief which most "agnostics" do not feel. Stop trying to make people pick sides.
A + theism literally means a lack of theism or theological beliefs.

Agnostics lack theological beliefs.

Agnostics are, in fact, athiests. By the simple virtue of what the words mean.
 
A + theism literally means a lack of theism or theological beliefs.

Agnostics lack theological beliefs.

Agnostics are, in fact, athiests. By the simple virtue of what the words mean.

This is an argument from the meaning of words. It's not applicable to people who defy such classification.

Some people define themselves as agnostics, so rather than splitting etymological hairs we should consider what THEY mean by it. Which is overwhelmingly that they don't want to be involved in arguments about the existence of god(s).

Alternatively, you could come up with a label for "don't know with enough certainty to argue" instead of "agnostic"
 
People that misuse the words are wrong.

That is literally what the words mean.

And by virtue of what the words mean agnostics are, in fact, athiests.

Misunderstanding the meaning of words does not change the meaning of the words.
 
People that misuse the words are wrong.

That is literally what the words mean.

And by virtue of what the words mean agnostics are, in fact, athiests.

Misunderstanding the meaning of words does not change the meaning of the words.

Agnosticism is the view or belief that the existence of God, of the divine or the supernatural is unknown or unknowable.[1][2][3] Another definition provided is the view that "human reason is incapable of providing sufficient rational grounds to justify either the belief that God exists or the belief that God does not exist."

You're wrong.
 
No, I am right. Those definitions for agnosticism are fine. Good.

Somone holding those beliefs lacks theism or theological beliefs.

Therefore, by definition, somone holding those beliefs is an athiest.
 
Born again Christian not affiliated with any religious organization, although we enjoy the guidance of a particular pastor from GA.
 
How do you know?
I tried to use the Jedi mind trick and force push something, but nothing happened. Maybe I should get a Midichlorian injection, which I assume is the Star Wars version of botox.
I can say this, as an atheist, I promise I will never knock on your door trying to talk you out of your god beliefs.
If only theists would show me the same consideration.
 
No, I am right. Those definitions for agnosticism are fine. Good.

Somone holding those beliefs lacks theism or theological beliefs.

Therefore, by definition, somone holding those beliefs is an athiest.

Atheism, in the broadest sense, is an absence of belief in the existence of deities.[1][2][3][4] Less broadly, atheism is a rejection of the belief that any deities exist.[5][6] In an even narrower sense, atheism is specifically the position that there are no deities.[1][2][7][8] Atheism is contrasted with theism,[9][10] which in its most general form is the belief that at least one deity exists.[10][11][12]

You're still wrong. If agnosticism was logically the same as atheism, there wouldn't be two different words.

Lack of belief in the existence of A, is not logically identical to belief in the non-existence of A.

And again, you're talking about a label people use to identify themselves. Dictionary definitions should give way to what they mean by the label. Atheists have a bad reputation for being hostile to religious people, and agnostics quite understandably want to distance themselves from that. Agnostics are more tolerant of the beliefs of others, than Atheists are.

Are you an Atheist, btw?
 
Proved my point.

Yes I am an athiest. I lack theological beliefs, and if you are an agnostic you also lack theological beliefs and are an athiest too.
 
Proved my point.

Yes I am an athiest. I lack theological beliefs, and if you are an agnostic you also lack theological beliefs and are an athiest too.

You're unable to grasp the difference between a positive belief in non-existence, and a lack of belief. Suppose I told you I had a phrase in mind (but I won't tell you what it is) and demanded you agree or disagree with it. Surely the only honest response is "I don't know" ... well it's just the same with agnostics. They may be strict (it is not possible to know) or they may be convenient (they would rather not say) but in neither case can they accurately be described as Atheists.

People like you, trying to recruit to your obnoxious form of Atheism, are the reason people like me have to find some other label.

I choose the portmanteau word "Apathy + theist" or Apatheist. I'm not interested in proofs or disproofs. God just doesn't matter that much to me.
 
What is your religion? Just a short poll
You've left out hundreds. Scientology, Mormon, Satanism (both kinds), Wiccan, Voodoo, HooDoo, PAganism, Asatru, the list is nearly endless.
 


Misusing a word doesn't change its meaning.
 
I choose the portmanteau word "Apathy + theist" or Apatheist. I'm not interested in proofs or disproofs. God just doesn't matter that much to me.
I like that. Good word and definition. They should add it to the dictionary.
 
Misusing a word doesn't change its meaning.

"Agnostics are Atheists" is actually incorrect. I'd let you say "some Agnostics are Atheists" but I doubt you'd be satisfied by that.

Prominent Atheists like Hitchens and Dawkins hammer the argument "if it can't be proven to exist, it does not exist" which is logically incorrect. Agnostics sometimes take the position that proof is not necessary, but they simply prefer to not believe in God. This is more compatible with the "reasonable doubt" standard of science: what has been observed is reasonably believed to exist, BUT what has not been observed is still possible.
 
"Agnostics are Atheists" is actually incorrect. I'd let you say "some Agnostics are Atheists" but I doubt you'd be satisfied by that.
If you call yourself agnostic but hold theological beliefs you aren't agnostic.

If you don't hold theological beliefs you are an atheist also even if you call yourself agnostic.

I like your word though. Apatheist. That is good. And I think accurate for many people.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…