In cases of self defense?Incorrect. Murder is never legal.
One person proposed raising taxes to take care of the extra children. That's the only real plan.Page 17, just curious if anyone has actually proposed a plan yet?
In cases of self defense?
But we're talking of abortion, the cessation of bringing a birth to term, which has been made legal by law.
Both are social norms, and even codified law. They can even be called cultural standards. But they are not universal facts, they are opinion. Other societies, and other people , may see it differently, and codify their opinions accordingly.Killing in self defense is not murder. Nor is abortion.
That's what I've been saying.Killing in self defense is not murder. Nor is abortion.
One person proposed raising taxes to take care of the extra children. That's the only real plan.
If abortion was banned, penalties were heavy and intensive policing was used to track down providers and women so that very few abortions happened there would be about 700.000 additional children born every year.
What kind of legislation would Congressman and women have to enact in order to deal with 700,000 unwanted children every year that need medical services, child care, education, financial support of 75%, police, jails, counseling, job support, welfare?
Since banning abortion is a conservative dream how will you accomplish this and what kind of solution do you proposer dealing with the 700,000 additional unwanted children ?
Well, yeah! But that doesn't deal with the extra children after overturning Roe.
Well, yeah! But that doesn't deal with the extra children after overturning Roe.
How about mandatory support of said baby(-eis) from the baby daddy? So much easier to get a check from Uncle Sam than baby daddy?
Would you be opposed to sending such fathers to work camps then? So they can work under supervision? Problem is you want it not just both ways - but every way. You want women to remain stupid so they can put out for just any ol' Tom, Dick, or Harry without holding her or the baby daddy accountable for any action on their part. The sexual revolution is over - women lost.
Abortion is NOT going to be banned, and Roe v Wade IS and will remain the Law of the Land unless, in a very unlikely event, an Amendment to our Constitution could be passed to create a basis upon which Roe v Wade could be overturned.
Get the Barrett confirmation over with as quickly as possible, and I believe both Democrats and Republicans will find her the quintessential Justice if we want to eliminate or reduce the application of political bias from the interpretation of our Constitution as the means by which Congress fundamentally changes our form of government.And I support a Woman's Right to choose an abortion end only after birth.
Five would be enough, yet Roe v Wade has not been overturned.Six SC justices, assuming Ms Barrett is confirmed, have stated that Roe is bad law and they would overturn it. What makes you sure that abortions will not be banned when abortion decisions go back to the states to decide?
Abortion is NOT going to be banned, and Roe v Wade IS and will remain the Law of the Land unless, in a very unlikely event, an Amendment to our Constitution could be passed to create a basis upon which Roe v Wade could be overturned.
Get the Barrett confirmation over with as quickly as possible, and I believe both Democrats and Republicans will find her the quintessential Justice if we want to eliminate or reduce the application of political bias from the interpretation of our Constitution as the means by which Congress fundamentally changes our form of government.
And I support a Woman's Right to choose an abortion end only after birth.
The CCC program giving young men work during the depression from 1934 to 1943 served 3M men and cost $3B. Every year 800,000 abortion are performed representing 800,000 baby daddies. In 9 years the would be 7.2M young men in a CCC like work program. Is it realistic to expect this to be a solution to 800,000 unwanted children born every year?
No one is forced to have an abortion. Though eating a child, your own or others, should be illegal and probably would result in prosecution.Nah, by all means .... kill them off. After all abortion is Darwin's right hand man. Nothing I can say or do will ever make an abortophile see the human reproduction cycle as something to be taken seriously in the first place. No difference in abortion and animals that eat their young. So much for being evolved.
If chicks would choose their babydaddies like they choose their selfies, they wouldn't have all that drama...
One person proposed raising taxes to take care of the extra children. That's the only real plan.
How about mandatory support of said baby(-eis) from the baby daddy? So much easier to get a check from Uncle Sam than baby daddy?
How many articles have you read describing the success of getting fathers to support their children.
Would you be opposed to sending such fathers to work camps then? So they can work under supervision?
You want women to remain stupid so they can put out for just any ol' Tom, Dick, or Harry without holding her or the baby daddy accountable for any action on their part. The sexual revolution is over - women lost.
Roberts is nota locked in conservative vote which is why Ms Barrett is so sought after. I believe that the 10th Amendment has been the reason Roe is called bad law.Five would be enough, yet Roe v Wade has not been overturned.
Are you aware of anything per se, in our Constitution other than a strictly religious interpretation, which would/could provide a basis for the SC to rule Roe v Wade unconstitutional?
Roberts is nota locked in conservative vote which is why Ms Barrett is so sought after. I believe that the 10th Amendment has been the reason Roe is called bad law.
Congress IS delegated to the U.S. Congress to pass laws. Can you make a case of HOW Roe v Wade violates the 10th Amendment?Six SC justices, assuming Ms Barrett is confirmed, have stated that Roe is bad law and they would overturn it. What makes you sure that abortions will not be banned when abortion decisions go back to the states to decide?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?