• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

What is this fight about?

Firearm owners are fighting to protect their guns and use thereof

  • Yes

    Votes: 2 66.7%
  • No

    Votes: 1 33.3%

  • Total voters
    3
  • Poll closed .

Crimefree

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 24, 2009
Messages
10,476
Reaction score
2,623
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Is gun control a fight by firearm owners to hold on to their guns and protect their guns and sport or recreation?
 
It is deliberately a catch question to see how many have thought about the purpose of gun control.

I suppose one could ask what is the use or purpose of gun control as a question from the other direction. Is it to fight crime or does it have some other use citizens see as valid?
 
It is deliberately a catch question to see how many have thought about the purpose of gun control.

I suppose one could ask what is the use or purpose of gun control as a question from the other direction. Is it to fight crime or does it have some other use citizens see as valid?

The purpose of gun control in history

1770s=to control the colonialists who were starting to reject the dictatorial nonsense of the crown

1860s-to prevent freed blacks from fighting back against the "Night Riders"

1870s-west-to allow the dominant crime family in some western towns to prevent armed resistance to their rule

Sullivan Act in NYC-to prevent Italian Longshoreman from resisting shakedowns by the Irish Mob which was also known as the NYPD

1934-to allow FDR to pander to those complaining about the government created violence that came from prohibition era bootleggers

1960s-as a ploy by the Democrats to stave off the claims by Nixon and other conservatives that the Democrat party was weak on black street crime.

1986-Hughes amendment-a dishonest and not properly implemented poison pill by spiteful Democrat assholes to derail a pro gun bill that was going to pass and be signed by Reagan

1990s-Pandering by the Democrats over a few well publicized shootings (like Patrick Purdy in Stockton california) as well as to implement Josh Sugarmann's strategy of confusing machine guns with semi auto sporting rifles. Also-to punish the NRA and its members for their effective support of many GOP candidates

1996-the Lautenberg Amendment-Democrats pandering to the feminist left as well as the anti gun movement

from then on its either pandering or attacking the NRA or both
 
Back
Top Bottom