Montecresto
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2013
- Messages
- 24,561
- Reaction score
- 5,507
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
You can't enforce UNGA resolutions period, they are not international law, they're strongly worded letters, do you even know the difference between a UNSC Resolution and a UNGA Resolution?
This dealt with foreign media and was discontinued in 1976.
I notice you provide no link for your second source, shocking. :roll: Ed Snowden is a proven liar. Provide first hand accounts of those actually in the employ of any service in the US government to troll internet forums and post propaganda the way my sources have done. You can't because they don't exist, however, the evidence regarding the authoritarian Russian regime paying propagandists to troll internet forums by the post has been presented and you have nothing as a rebuttal save for pointing to anti-Soviet propaganda efforts during the cold war ended in the mid-70s and nonsense from a questionable source with absolutely no substantiating evidence to back the claims therein.
Neither are enforceable by the UN. The UN hasn't an enforcement arm. Do you understand that?
And you are proof of paid trolls, how often have you changed your user name, and avatar to advance propaganda?
New Snowden Doc Reveals How GCHQ/NSA Use The Internet To 'Manipulate, Deceive And Destroy Reputations'
from the and-not-just-terrorists dept
A few weeks ago, Glenn Greenwald, while working with NBC News, revealed some details of a GCHQ presentation concerning how the surveillance organization had a "dirty tricks" group known as JTRIG -- the Joint Threat Research Intelligence Group. Now, over at The Intercept, he's revealed the entire presentation and highlighted more details about how JTRIG would seek to infiltrate different groups online and destroy people's reputations -- going way, way, way beyond just targeting terrorist groups and threats to national security.
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/2...-manipulate-deceive-destroy-reputations.shtml
Greenwald Blows The Whistle On Covert Blog Infiltration
Post the actual documents, once again Snowden is a proven liar. His assertions regarding Operation PRISM for example have been shown to be false. The Joint Threat Research Intelligence Group (JTRIG) and Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) aren't even freaking American they're British. :roll:
Post the actual documents, once again Snowden is a proven liar. His assertions regarding Operation PRISM for example have been shown to be false. The Joint Threat Research Intelligence Group (JTRIG) and Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) aren't even freaking American they're British. :roll:
lmfao those are for AQ websites; such as, "Inspire", not comments sections on the Guardian and regular debate forums to spread propaganda like the Russian program so spare us the false analogies.
lmfao those are for AQ websites; such as, "Inspire", not comments sections on the Guardian and regular debate forums to spread propaganda like the Russian program so spare us the false analogies.
NATO expansion eastward.
NATO expansion is always by invitation.
They must love NATO in Libya, eh? Some very expansive bombing, don't ya' know?
That was a NATO operation, at the invitation of Libyan insurgents, not NATO expansion.
NATO expansion is always by invitation.
I wonder if some disgruntled Americans could get a NATO regime change to happen in the US?
I seem to recall Yanukovych going with Russia.
Try your luck. The Libyan insurrection was a legitimate popular uprising, regardless of what has happened subsequently.
Unfortunately for him his people wanted another direction.
Bull crap. Since when do the few make the decision for the many, US/NATO abuse of the UN resolution for the use of force has Libya in tethers, sorry, like Ukraine, just another US foreign policy failure.
Jack Matlock, U.S. ambassador to the Soviet Union from 1987 to 1991, says that the U.S. and NATO are to blame for the Ukraine crisis:
The fact is they are going to intervene until they are certain that there is no prospect of Ukraine becoming a member of NATO. And all of the threats by NATO and so on to sort of increase defenses elsewhere is simply provocative to the Russians. Now, I’m not saying that’s right, but I am saying that’s the way Russia is going to react. And frankly, this is all predictable. And those of us who helped negotiate the end of the Cold War almost unanimously said in the 1990s, “Do not expand NATO eastward. Find a different way to protect eastern Europe, a way that includes Russia. Otherwise, eventually there’s going to be a confrontation, because there is a red line, as far as any Russian government is concerned, when it comes to Ukraine and Georgia and other former republics of the Soviet Union.”
And your wrong again, a 50/50 split is not "his people", that's half his people. But good day Hays, I knew you couldn't be trusted for honesty in this.
I wonder if some disgruntled Americans could get a NATO regime change to happen in the US?
Greetings, Montecresto. :2wave:
I doubt it, since we provide a big chunk of their funding. Money does talk, even though sometimes it only whispers threats! :mrgreen:!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?