vergiss
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2005
- Messages
- 2,356
- Reaction score
- 1
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Liberal
doughgirl said:If the shoe fits wear it.
How does it feel to be one of them? Bloody hypocrite.
doughgirl said:If the shoe fits wear it.
FISHX said:Because being pro life is much more than just being anti termination
Looks like you and fishx are both agaibst the death penalty, when most people who are pro-life are for it.doughgirl said:I believe God is the giver of life and death.
people who are pro-life and actually delve into the logic of their stance usually conclude the death penalty is unneeded in a "civilized" society. There are many on the pro-life side, though--like many on the pro-choice side--, that just go with gut reactions to issues and don't bother with the rational consistency of their positions.tryreading said:Looks like you and fishx are both agaibst the death penalty, when most people who are pro-life are for it.
Well, the way that Roe-v-Wade can be overcome, short of a compleat overturning of the ruling, is by conferring upon the fetus the legal standing of "person".tryreading said:If Roe vs Wade were to be overturned by the new Supreme Court, and abortion laws were enacted in your state, what should the punishment be for a woman who has had an abortion?
Felicity said:people who are pro-life and actually delve into the logic of their stance usually conclude the death penalty is unneeded in a "civilized" society. There are many on the pro-life side, though--like many on the pro-choice side--, that just go with gut reactions to issues and don't bother with the rational consistency of their positions.
Busta said:Well, the way that Roe-v-Wade can be overcome, short of a compleat overturning of the ruling, is by conferring upon the fetus the legal standing of "person".
At that point, since all people are given equal protection under the law, ending the life of a fetus would be treated no different than if the same were don to a newborn or an adult.
The type and degree of penalty would greatly depend upon the circomstances, as is the case with any Justifiable Homicide/Murder/Depraved Indifference/etc., case.
If we were to take your illustration of what we may in-vision as the standard abortion visit, then the crime would likely be First Degree (premeditated) Murder; One count per terminated fetus, charged to the mother, the doctor(s), nurse(s), receptionist, even the person who gave her a ride to the clinic.
The punishment would then be subject to the state's legal code and the Judge's opinion.
Jane Schmuck may get a modest to severe term in prison. While a politician would likely get 100 days in jail and a petty fine.
Did I not?tryreading said:But you didn't give your opinion as to what the punishment should be.
Busta said:If we were to take your illustration of what we may in-vision as the standard abortion visit, then the crime would likely be First Degree (premeditated) Murder; One count per terminated fetus, charged to the mother, the doctor(s), nurse(s), receptionist, even the person who gave her a ride to the clinic.
The punishment would then be subject to the state's legal code and the Judge's opinion.
Busta said:What ever the punishment would be for taking you to a clinic and "aborting" you, that is what the punishment should be.
That's the way I understand it.tryreading said:So the punishment should be the same we would apply to someone who would kill me and I were defenceless?
That's life in prison or execution, if I understand you properly.
You don't have anything in mind.....do you?:lol:tryreading said:I want his lawyers if I ever get into trouble.
FutureIncoming said:Heh, an acquaintance told me that the woman shouldn't be punished at all, but the man who impregnated her, putting her into the situation where she needed to seek an abortion, should be castrated. Personally I think that's a bit harsh, but it WOULD prevent some repeat-offenses!
No. Pays to think ahead though. Even the innocent (I'm so innocent) can end up on the injection table.Felicity said:You don't have anything in mind.....do you?:lol:
Busta said:It would be interesting to see the case where the mother was charged with, not only Murder or whatever, but a hate crime on top of that (because, say, she got drunk and got pregnant by a black man).
FutureIncoming said:Well, I half-expect most any male human to object to castration as a penalty. It still remains true that pregnancy usually cannot happen without the participation of a male. And it remains true that if the cause of a crime can be prevented, then the crime can be prevented. How about penalizing BOTH, the man with castration and the woman with a hysterectomy? (Daffynition of "hysterectomy": An operation that takes away the kids but leaves the playground.)
The social consequences could be quite interesting! The typical failure rate of birth control leads to a lot of prevention-operations, and people still ABLE to breed get scared (and OTHER crimes increase as sexual frustration increases), while the penalized start inscreasing the STD rates, because they forgot that pregnancy isn't the only reason to be careful about sex. Not a pleasant place.
That would be up too her.tryreading said:I guess in your above scenario the woman is white. Would a white woman have to be drunk to have intercourse with a black man?
vergiss said:You're all assuming illegal terminations would be surgical. The use of herbs as an abortifacient were very common too, in which case it'd be extremely hard to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the mother used them with intent to miscarry.
tryreading said:But in the scenario she has had an illegal abortion, whatever the means, and now is awaiting your sentencing.
But then, people have the right to use deadly force against those persons who assault your body and try to use your bodily resources.Busta said:That's the way I understand it.
If a fetus is a person, then a fetus is a person.