- Joined
- Jul 1, 2011
- Messages
- 92,058
- Reaction score
- 91,082
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
You did that in 2016, too, so nothing has changed.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
yes, I voted against the orange fool in 2016.
You did that in 2016, too, so nothing has changed.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
yes, I voted against the orange fool in 2016.
So as I said, you haven’t learned much in four years.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That's fine when it is the appropriate standard. It isn't, as the poster stated at the time.
This is silly. It literally cannot tell us nothing.
All caps as if t were a clincher, but it netted empty air. However, you did underscore my point about thinking Justices follow the party of the President who appointed them. Tsk.
If you don't understand something, ask. The 6% is the standard for exclusively COVID-19, which is a useful number. For serious diseases, this portion is far higher. In the case of the coronavirus, comorbidity is not just the norm it's almost exclusive.I don't have a clue what you mean. What is "it" that's the appropriate standard? The death certificate is supposed to tell us how a patient died. 6% of those logged by CDC didn't tell us this and are incomplete, filled out incorrectly. That's all the 6% number tells us - how many were filled out by people who didn't know what they were doing, didn't care, were lazy, or perhaps didn't know HOW the person died, so left that blank. That's all that figure tells us. If you disagree, you'll need to explain but I know you won't or can't.
It is not even a statement. It is a suggestion to examine the rationale, so it cannot be either true or false.The post said, "Just look at the 8 (Democrats) - 2 (Republicans) DC Circuit ruling rationale on the Flynn case." That is a false statement - ignorant or a lie.
my number one issue is voting Tweety out.
Just out of curiosity. What is your main motivation for voting for Biden/Trump/Jorgensen/Hawkins?
According to the Pew Research Center, the public's top 5 issues are the Economy, Health-care, Supreme Court Justices, Covid-19 and Violent Crime.
Mine will probably be the economy.
He's about six months away from Depends and smashed bananas.
If you don't understand something, ask. The 6% is the standard for exclusively COVID-19, which is a useful number. For serious diseases, this portion is far higher. In the case of the coronavirus, comorbidity is not just the norm it's almost exclusive.
It is not even a statement. It is a suggestion to examine the rationale, so it cannot be either true or false.
Joe is advocating for vigilantism...Joe is not for democracy.
BTW, our country is a democratic republic. Representatives represent us voters.
We are not a democracy.
:2funny:Fascism and progressivism are extremely similar
At least you acknowledge that the number is legitimate. That's a start. A lethal disease, say ebola, can have well over half the certificates instead of 6%.LOL OK, so you hear grandma died of "COVID." What killed her? Did she have a stroke, a heart attack, did she contract pneumonia and that ultimately killed her? Did her lungs fill with fluid and she effectively drowned? Did her kidney or liver fail, perhaps in part as a result of drugs used to treat COVID? Obviously if the death certificate only lists "COVID 19" you have no idea. That's a problem. What it tells us is the death certificate is incomplete, wrong, filled out incorrectly, omits critical information that should be on the form. 6% were like that.
You just acknowledged it was not a lie.I'll just say, again, that the GOP is spreading lies
When facts don't matter, they don't.their base believes them, and that's a big reason why I will vote straight Democratic ticket for the foreseeable future.
Which was mostly irrelevant, since it is not the point of the sentence. You could simply have responded to that point, with a possible correction of the secondary detail. Instead, you compounded the situation with an error of your own. Nice.The vote wasn't 8 Democrats to 2 Republicans.
Too close to truth. BLM and Antifa act fascist.2funny:
At least you acknowledge that the number is legitimate. That's a start. A lethal disease, say ebola, can have well over half the certificates instead of 6%.
my number one issue is voting Tweety out.
This only gives legitimacy to the claim you said was invalid. If you don't understand what is said, it's better to ask than to make yourself look like a fool, as you did here.Sure it's "legitimate" - it tells us the percentage of death certificates filled out incorrectly because they are incomplete.
We know lots of women die from "breast cancer" but the death certificate won't list "breast cancer" as the only cause. Here's one example of how it would be presented in a properly completed death certificate.
View attachment 67293729
In this discussion, the physician or coroner would list COVID 19 on line C. Then lines B and A tell us the progression that ultimately caused death. There's no situation I can imagine where COVID is listed by itself on line A. because it doesn't tell us what actually caused the patient to die - heart failure, massive stroke, lungs filling with fluid and effectively drowning the patient, etc.
This only gives legitimacy to the claim you said was invalid. If you don't understand what is said, it's better to ask than to make yourself look like a fool, as you did here.
He's about six months away from Depends and smashed bananas.
Too close to truth. BLM and Antifa act fascist.
I'm voting for the upkeep of the American Constitution. I'm voting for Trump.
Lies and projection. Your president is the one inciting violence. Your president is the one who refuses to condemn Kyle Rittenhouse. Your president is the one who wants more violence, because he thinks it helps attract voters.
Very good! Any more high school civics you would like to try to laysplain to me? :lol:
You just said we're a democratic republic, which is by definition a form of democracy. Keeping your story straight is obviously not something you are skilled at.
I'm voting for the upkeep of the American Constitution. I'm voting for Trump.
I am not concerned about Covid-19. Based on recent CDC analysis, only 6% of all Covid-related deaths were actually caused by Covid-19 alone. The remaining 94% were of those on average with 2 or more pre-existing co-morbidities, and the vast majority of all all deaths are people 65 and older. COVID-19 Provisional Counts - Weekly Updates by Select Demographic and Geographic Characteristics
My original analysis has been proven correct. If people were made aware of the above by an honest MSM, then IMO the scaremongering would be less effective. That most people would begin demanding re-opening and removal of required "protections" except when in danger of encountering those at greatest risk.
I am not that concerned about healthcare, as I am solid as a rock.
My concerns, in order of importance are 1. 2A rights, 2. SCOTUS/Federal Court appointments of original intent interpretations (to protect the 2A & 1A individual rights), and 3. The economy.
So I pick SCOTUS appointments. We've recently seen how the Courts skew to "activism" when Democrats are appointed. Just look at the 8 (Democrats) - 2 (Republicans) DC Circuit ruling rationale on the Flynn case. Weak sauce on fishy partisan bias.
Just out of curiosity. What is your main motivation for voting for Biden/Trump/Jorgensen/Hawkins?
According to the Pew Research Center, the public's top 5 issues are the Economy, Health-care, Supreme Court Justices, Covid-19 and Violent Crime.
Mine will probably be the economy.
Give it up. You have the whole thing so screwed up in your head that you have no idea where you went wrong. It is sufficient to say that you called someone a liar when they weren't.I don't understand your comment. How does 'this' 'give legitimacy' to the false claim that the table showed only 6% didn't have a comorbidity?
That's President Trump and you have never forgiven him.:lol By which you mean they won't lie down and die on request.