• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

What is Behind The Right’s Obsession with Ocasio-Cortez?

I'm all for freedom of speech. You have the right to your biased, misinformed opinion. You're also incorrect if you feel he Dems use fear to motivate their base to the same sleazy, bigoted way the right-wing party does.

Lol, How am I being biased? It is simply a fact that fear and anger are the most effective emotions for politicians to prey on and ALL of them use it. The fact that you completely overlook those with whom you agree with shows how biased and misinformed you are.
 
Except that Palin was an airhead. This woman is whip smart.

LAFFRIOT..

You could hold hold a candle next her right ear and blow it through her left ear.

Socialist Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez: "If we work our butts off to make sure that we take back all three chambers of Congress — Uh, rather, all three chambers of government: the presidency, the Senate, and the House."
 
Lol, How am I being biased? It is simply a fact that fear and anger are the most effective emotions for politicians to prey on and ALL of them use it. The fact that you completely overlook those with whom you agree with shows how biased and misinformed you are.

The caravan is full of terrorists.

Mexicans are rapists.

Supply side economics benefits the working class.

It's not bigotry, it's religious choice.

Voter fraud is a thing.

Please give me an example of how Dems have lied like this to their base to motivate them.

Thanks.
 
The caravan is full of terrorists.

Mexicans are rapists.

Supply side economics benefits the working class.

It's not bigotry, it's religious choice.

Voter fraud is a thing.

Please give me an example of how Dems have lied like this to their base to motivate them.

Thanks.

Voter fraud is a thing, the extent to which is debatable.

Supply side economics does benefit the working class by creating jobs and lowering the cost of living.

I never heard anyone say Mexicans were rapists.

As far as Democrats:
"They want to put yall back in chains"
Russians stole the election
Republican healthcare plan is barbaric and millions will die.
Republicans are waging a war on women
Trump is the end of our democracy
Etc.

Edit: The lie is that supply side economics doesn't help the working class and Democrats know this, otherwise New York wouldn't have gave all those tax breaks to Amazon to lure their new HQ there.
 
Last edited:
When you are a public figure, the hoi polloi will throw flowers or cast bricks as they wish. If O-C elicits a sentimental and paternal offense, perhaps it is the defender that has the problem. This isn't 1958 with you defending a woman's honor, this is 2018 where women are supposed to no more protected from ridicule than a man - for good or ill.

Your post was vile, that of a very small person.

Be happy, but understand how you are disdained.
 
Voter fraud is a thing, the extent to which is debatable.

Supply side economics does benefit the working class by creating jobs and lowering the cost of living.

I never heard anyone say Mexicans were rapists.

As far as Democrats:
"They want to put yall back in chains"
Russians stole the election
Republican healthcare plan is barbaric and millions will die.
Republicans are waging a war on women
Trump is the end of our democracy
Etc.

Edit: The lie is that supply side economics doesn't help the working class and Democrats know this, otherwise New York wouldn't have gave all those tax breaks to Amazon to lure their new HQ there.

Yes, supply side economics works. That's why every GOP administration in recent history had ended in a recession after the draconian tax cuts. It happened to Bush in 2008, Poppy Bush in 1996 and Reagan in 1980. But the right always tries to try the "jedi mind trick" and repeat the mistake. Our latest $1.5 trillion addition to the national debt is a great example.
 
Yes, supply side economics works. That's why every GOP administration in recent history had ended in a recession after the draconian tax cuts. It happened to Bush in 2008, Poppy Bush in 1996 and Reagan in 1980. But the right always tries to try the "jedi mind trick" and repeat the mistake. Our latest $1.5 trillion addition to the national debt is a great example.
First off, Reagan didn't take office until 1981. And there has been no "$1.5 trillion addition to the national debt. Nor were there ever "draconian tax cuts".
 
First off, Reagan didn't take office until 1981. And there has been no "$1.5 trillion addition to the national debt. Nor were there ever "draconian tax cuts".

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/s...lt-has-had-one-in-their-first-term-2018-05-02

Since the presidency of Theodore Roosevelt, who left office in 1909, every single Republican president has seen a recession take hold in their first term.

https://thehill.com/policy/finance/382319-gop-tax-law-will-add-19-trillion-to-debt-cbo

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/mar/15/donald-trump-adds-1-trillion-national-debt-14-mont/

President Trump has now amassed his first $1 trillion in debt, crossing that ignominious mark late last week — and analysts said it’s just a taste of what’s to come after the tax-cuts and spending spree of recent months.

Indeed, his next $1 trillion could come within a year, and one analyst said he could soon be staring at $3 trillion annual deficits if things go particularly badly in interest rates.

It’s a major reversal for a president who during the campaign had said given eight years he could eliminate the debt entirely, but is instead looking at setting records for red ink.

I hope you're not running out of air in your right-wing bubble.
 
Yes, supply side economics works. That's why every GOP administration in recent history had ended in a recession after the draconian tax cuts. It happened to Bush in 2008, Poppy Bush in 1996 and Reagan in 1980. But the right always tries to try the "jedi mind trick" and repeat the mistake. Our latest $1.5 trillion addition to the national debt is a great example.

None of which has anything to do with helping the middle class which was the entire point. Again, if supply side economics wasn't right then why do Democrats bend over backwards giving tax breaks to lure businesses to their areas? The problem is not taxing the people enough, or preferably cut spending alongside it. There is a reason all the countries that Democrats point to with all the wonderful social programs have lower corporate tax rates alongside much higher personal tax rates than us.
 
Trumps brand of stupidity is more than tolerated and he's neither young or cute.

Trump is actually pretty straight forward and open in his thinking. His thinking is pretty straight line logical.

He has a goal. He identifies the best plan to reach his goal. He sets out to execute the plan.

What are you thinking of in particular that supports your opinion that he is stupid?
 
Trump is actually pretty straight forward and open in his thinking. His thinking is pretty straight line logical.

He has a goal. He identifies the best plan to reach his goal. He sets out to execute the plan.

What are you thinking of in particular that supports your opinion that he is stupid?

Good point. Whatever makes Trump richer is what President Trump wants.
 
Emoluments violations. Read up if you're ignorant.

What in specific are you talking about?

Throwing a bomb and running away is only that. If you have some fact that originates in the real world, please present it.
 
What in specific are you talking about?

Throwing a bomb and running away is only that. If you have some fact that originates in the real world, please present it.

You wrote a personal attack. I replied in kind. Educate yourself before attacking others, okay, tough guy? You don't know what an emoluments violation is--you are ignorant.
 
You wrote a personal attack. I replied in kind. Educate yourself before attacking others, okay, tough guy? You don't know what an emoluments violation is--you are ignorant.

I know what they are. I don't know what imagined infraction you are so upset about.

Perhaps you could link to the indictment?

What was the personal attack that you imagined? Perhaps you could cut and paste that.
 
Back
Top Bottom