- Joined
- Mar 22, 2020
- Messages
- 304
- Reaction score
- 84
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
So you have nothing.
So you have nothing.Yeah, all the shit you cut out of your quote.
No, you have nothing, you removed it, ignored it......and you have nothing in response.So you have nothing.
Hey...So you have nothing.
Your post: https://debatepolitics.com/threads/what-happened-to-the-democratic-party.567720/post-1081431488Sigh. Is it worth taking to people like this? Did I ever say that a person will never need healthcare? Why do people read into my posts what they wished I had said?
So you have nothing.
Yeah, all the shit you cut out of your quote.
So when I say that your best bet is to stay as healthy as you can so you avoid the healthcare system for as long as you can, you think that means I said you’ll never need healthcare at all.Your post: https://debatepolitics.com/threads/what-happened-to-the-democratic-party.567720/post-1081431488
It is kind of ridiculous when someone makes a bad argument, then they act as they didn't make it when they are challenged on it.
I don’t accept lazy arguments. If he can’t say it then he doesn’t understand it.No, you have nothing, you removed it, ignored it......and you have nothing in response.
Source?Other than bending the cost curve for the only sustained period ever, bringing uninsurance to all-time lows, and improving health care quality and outcomes for tens of millions of Americans, sure. Or don’t you care about health care?
I just wish @Liberty One were better at it.Own the libs!
can't say what?he can’t say it
Oh that’s easy, MAGA get all their talking points from the same place - the media.Hey...
You forgot to answer my question...
Where did you get the idea that transexuality is vile and disgusting?
Oh ****....did you just ask for a cite....after calling multiple cites provided to you..."lazy"?Source?
Source?
And you’re not much of a writer. For future reference, a list of links is not an argument.You don't seem like much of a reader.
And you’re not much of a writer. For future reference, a list of links is not an argument.
Source?
It true, the democratic party once known as the big tent party and the working man’s party has changed. But so too has the republican party. The change began when the democrats rid themselves of their conservative wing, the old solid democratic conservative south while the republicans were getting rid of their liberal win, the old Rockefeller liberals of the northeast. So much for the big tent party.It’s hard to recognize the Democrat Party these days. Once the party of anti-war activism and healthcare reform, they’ve morphed into something unrecognizable. They used to question military intervention, but now they stand behind it without hesitation. Healthcare costs were a major issue, and while I didn’t agree with their solutions, at least they highlighted the problem. Today, they seem more interested in pronouns than prescription prices.
Free speech? They used to defend it, even for unpopular ideas. Now, they’re all about banning “hate speech,” throwing out the very principle they once championed. As for the working class? Once their backbone, now they seem to despise them, siding with giant corporations instead of small businesses. The party that fought for the little guy now appears more concerned with identity politics than real issues that affect real Americans.
Some will argue they can focus on both, but let’s be honest—there’s only so much time in the day. Priorities matter. Instead of tackling the issues that affect everyday people, the Democrats are wasting time on things that don’t move the needle for most Americans. It’s a disappointing shift, and it leaves many of us wondering: Who do they really represent now?
It’s easy to tell when someone doesn’t actually understand a topic and they are just copying someone else’s words.
“Bending the cost curve”No kidding, you’re struggling mightily here.
Here is the Dems most important goal for their entire party:It’s hard to recognize the Democrat Party these days. Once the party of anti-war activism and healthcare reform, they’ve morphed into something unrecognizable. They used to question military intervention, but now they stand behind it without hesitation. Healthcare costs were a major issue, and while I didn’t agree with their solutions, at least they highlighted the problem. Today, they seem more interested in pronouns than prescription prices.
Free speech? They used to defend it, even for unpopular ideas. Now, they’re all about banning “hate speech,” throwing out the very principle they once championed. As for the working class? Once their backbone, now they seem to despise them, siding with giant corporations instead of small businesses. The party that fought for the little guy now appears more concerned with identity politics than real issues that affect real Americans.
Some will argue they can focus on both, but let’s be honest—there’s only so much time in the day. Priorities matter. Instead of tackling the issues that affect everyday people, the Democrats are wasting time on things that don’t move the needle for most Americans. It’s a disappointing shift, and it leaves many of us wondering: Who do they really represent now?
I certainly hope those with common sense realize I was being satirical with my comments about how the Dems look at the Garcia issues.Here is the Dems most important goal for their entire party:
FREE KILMAR GARCIA!!!!
If they accomplish that, they will have scored a major moral victory. Then they can focus on making AOC the next presidential candidate.
They are Republican voters who claim to be Libertarians.So what exactly is a Libertarian- Right lean? It just seems like a Trumper with a different title on this board.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?