• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

What do you think about this decision by the owner of a testing site for Covid

independentusa

DP Veteran
Joined
Nov 10, 2016
Messages
14,607
Reaction score
9,303
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed

I am not sure if I agree with the owner's decision. Even stupids deserve to be served when it comes to life saving tests. I can understand though the owners feelings about someone who has done such damage to his community.
 
Morally it would be better to give her the test. If nothing else she is more likely to test positive compared to the average person and she could infect others. However, I'm pretty sympathetic to their choice.
 
Morally it would be better to give her the test. If nothing else she is more likely to test positive compared to the average person and she could infect others. However, I'm pretty sympathetic to their choice.
The moral issue is offset by the fact there is another, less convenient test available.
 

I am not sure if I agree with the owner's decision. Even stupids deserve to be served when it comes to life saving tests. I can understand though the owners feelings about someone who has done such damage to his community.

If you say something I disagree with, I will punish you as much as I can.

btw, I wonder what the Supremes would have to say about this.
 
If you say something I disagree with, I will punish you as much as I can.

btw, I wonder what the Supremes would have to say about this.
Well the owner could just say it violated her religion to provide the test.
 
Wow, thats pretty racist by the owner. Shame.
 
Back
Top Bottom