• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

What did the president know and when did he know it?

bongsaway

DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 16, 2019
Messages
43,576
Reaction score
32,155
Location
Flori-duh
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Progressive
I think it's time that question starts being asked. Stone was the link between the russians and the campaign and someone directed the 'senior' official in the organization to contact Stone about wikileaks. Who is that someone? And as we all know, nothing happens without trump's approval.
 
I think it's time that question starts being asked. Stone was the link between the russians and the campaign and someone directed the 'senior' official in the organization to contact Stone about wikileaks. Who is that someone? And as we all know, nothing happens without trump's approval.

Many interviews with persons who have had personal experience in the Trump organization and writers who have been let inside such as Tony Schwartz - tell us repeatedly that nothing goes on in the Trump organization - in terms of big decisions - that does not come from Donald himself. He is a very hands on (no pun intended) manager who insists on being in the loop on anything of importance.

We also know for a fact that the Trump campaign was very small compared to other presidential campaigns and was a very mom and pop sort of operation with Trump in charge of everything.

What we know from the Stone indictment yesterday is that the top Trump campaign officials were indeed in the loop in the back and forth with Wikileaks and their Russian sources that resulted in the Russian stealing of the election.

To pretend that Trump could turn his back on forty years of management style and all the sudden was a distant and removed candidate who was simply misled by others stabbing him in the back is ridiculous on its face and there is not one shred of evidence to support such a fantasy.
 
I think it's time that question starts being asked. Stone was the link between the russians and the campaign and someone directed the 'senior' official in the organization to contact Stone about wikileaks. Who is that someone? And as we all know, nothing happens without trump's approval.

Wrong.

There is no evidence...especially not in Mueller's indictment...to indicate that Stone has or had any contact with Russians.

So no...this is not the time to start asking your nonsense questions. Get your facts straight first.
 
I think it's time that question starts being asked. Stone was the link between the russians and the campaign and someone directed the 'senior' official in the organization to contact Stone about wikileaks. Who is that someone? And as we all know, nothing happens without trump's approval.

I think the question was asked at the start of the Meuller investigation and we won’t know the answer until the investigation is finished and no one knows when that will be.
 
Back
Top Bottom