Enough of the over emotional already.
Oh heaven forbid that congress, which is already disruptive enough on it's own, especially the House, were to be disrupted from others.
Which part, passage, paragraph or even sentence or sentences, of the transcript of the speech that day would meet the legal bar of incientment?
Many who participated in the chaos as the U.S. Capitol building went under attack on Wednesday came straight from a rally held by President Donald Trump.
abcnews.go.com
Do please point it out. I have yet someone holding your position point out where such accused incitement actually occurred.
Never mind that the FBI investigations have uncovered that this riot from was planned for weeks in advance, rather than being incited on that day.
"Trump told the rioters to come to Washington on the 6th and it would be wild."
True, and wasn't it a wild political event? So many supporters attended, ten's of thousands, that's pretty wild that Trump would have that much support after an election that he lost.
A few among those thousands of supporters made the rash and unwise decision to breach the capitol security barrier (even before the speech was completed), and the instance those individuals did breach the security barrier they were in the wrong, and roundly condemned by all sides (as it appropriate and just), all political parties and many others, and rounded up by the FBI for criminal charges and trials (as is also appropriate and just - accountability for one's actions still being an American value).
I'd leave it up to a US attorney to make his case that Trump was guilty of incitement of this riot. I have so little faith and trust on Congress, as is typical given their poll results so as to not be atypical, to believe that this impeachment is little more than 100% political, and, as has been stated on a number of occasions in this forum, that impeachment is a political process (therefore little more than politically motivated) process..
Of course, opinions differ on all of the above.