What are your thoughts on on Trump Derangement Syndrome?

[GDViking]

What's scary is, we don't know who the official Biden handlers are or will be

Probably moot though. I say we get 4 more years.

He will get far more years behind bars than just four!!!

 

[GDViking]

Is that the left's version of the mustard Former President Obama used on his hamburger? If so, that is equally ridiculous while also sadly funny.

If it were up to most of the cultists on here Obama would have been impeached for mustard and a brown shirt, the highest crimes they have proven Obama is guilty of...

 

[2distracted]

Sure, in both cases you're SOL.

Agreed

So I wish ppl would stop condemning welfare recipients. Being a single parent is #1 hardest job bc you are alone..but hopefully have some family or friends

 

[2distracted]

As long as trump says and does dangerous, bigoted, moronic, and insane things, he's going to get called on it. Deal with it or don't. We really don't care.

When did Trump do any of that?


Hmmmmmm

 

[2distracted]

If it were up to most of the cultists on here Obama would have been impeached for mustard and a brown shirt, the highest crimes they have proven Obama is guilty of...

Time for u watch real news

You don't know what Obummer did bc MSM refuses to do those stories. The DNC pretty much owns MSM

 

[eman623]

I ignore a lot of it myself

They say children throwing a tantrum should be ignored until they calm down

They also say if people spend too much time around people with mental problems they start to show the same symptoms.

 

[lurchadams]

When did Trump do any of that?


Hmmmmmm

I guess you've been 2distracted to notice.

hmmmmmmm

 

[Xilnik]

Time for u watch real news

You don't know what Obummer did bc MSM refuses to do those stories. The DNC pretty much owns MSM

What did he allegedly do?

 

[2distracted]

I guess you've been 2distracted to notice.

hmmmmmmm

Yes, distracted by REAL news

 

[Welkin]

While I certainly beleive that criticism of Trump has on occassion reached the point of hyperbole, as is common with people who mostly speak to their base, the man's a circus clown, and 'TDS' is simply a lazy attempt at attacking his critics and calling them crazy, rather than address the criticism. You don't have to defend the indefensible if you just shout 'You're just a TDSer!' and act like it's a mic-drop.

 

[2distracted]

What did he allegedly do?

Nothing much...just tell his underlings to sabotage the Trump campaign..then when Trump won tried to get his cabinet members (Michael Flynn...) in trouble so they wouldn't be listened to about the corruption in the Obummer administration.. allegedly

 

[2distracted]

While I certainly beleive that criticism of Trump has on occassion reached the point of hyperbole, as is common with people who mostly speak to their base, the man's a circus clown, and 'TDS' is simply a lazy attempt at attacking his critics and calling them crazy, rather than address the criticism. You don't have to defend the indefensible if you just shout 'You're just a TDSer!' and act like it's a mic-drop.

Please

If anti Trumpers had something nefarious I would call it such

But all they seem to have is Waaaaahhhh... Hitlery lost! Hitlery lost!

 

[Xilnik]

Nothing much...just tell his underlings to sabotage the Trump campaign..then when Trump won tried to get his cabinet members (Michael Flynn...) in trouble so they wouldn't be listened to about the corruption in the Obummer administration.. allegedly

Oh, the spin on Fox News. Got it. Let me know when they are ready to prosecute. Otherwise, the evidence is as useful as evidence that shows Trump colluded with Russia.

 

[Welkin]

Please

If anti Trumpers had something nefarious I would call it such

But all they seem to have is Waaaaahhhh... Hitlery lost! Hitlery lost!

I despise the Clintons, as I do all all neoliberals/third-way Democrats, and I voted third-party because I literally wanted what I considered to be the lesser evil to lose, and for chaos to ensue. I criticize the president, but certainly not from a place of sour grapes over Hillary Clinton's defeat. I think that centrists are fixated and bitter over the result of the election, but the criticism I hear coming from them has more to do with what he actually says, what he actually does, and CNN/MSNBC talking points. I think that you're mischaracterizing your political opponent's grievances simply because it's easier and more convenient than confronting them on any substantive level.

Or perhaps you've never truly listened to any of your opponents, and you honestly believe the refrain in your own echo-chamber.

 

[Glitch]

People today are so poorly put together as all that....a lot of them...

So Sad what has become of my people.

We used to be better.

Really? When was that? Perhaps you were referring to the 1980 riots. Or maybe you were referring to the 1968 riots, when Democrats were setting off bombs and killing police?

It would appear that after every election that Democrats lose they destroy property and commit acts of violence. So when exactly was this mythical time in history when Democrats "used to be better?"

 

[Hawkeye10]

Really? When was that? Perhaps you were referring to the 1980 riots. Or maybe you were referring to the 1968 riots, when Democrats were setting off bombs and killing police?

It would appear that after every election that Democrats lose they destroy property and commit acts of violence. So when exactly was this mythical time in history when Democrats "used to be better?"

Pre 1967

 

[Glitch]

Except the left wasn't nearly as outraged with Bush 43 as they are with Trump, at least not in Bush's 1st term.

Bush actually had close to a 90 percent approval rating shortly after 9-11, meaning a good share of democrats and liberals supported him. Trump hasn't anywhere close to that even when the market reached new highs and unemployment was at its lowest in decades.

What caused many people to be upset with Bush - myself included - was the prolonged Iraq quagmire which ended up costing more money and more lives than anything beneficial. That along with the double-dip recession gave him a very low approval rating by the time he left office - even lower than Trump's rating.

Did you forget abut the rioting and destruction of property after Bush43 was elected in 2000? If Republicans hadn't controlled the House, the Democrats would have surely tried to impeach him just like Trump. By the time Democrats did control the House in 2006, it was too late to impeach Bush. Bush43's 90% approval rating lasted all of three days after the 09/11/2001 terrorist attacks before Democrats were dancing in the streets cheering for the deaths of more Americans once again. Democrats have a deep-seated hatred for the US, and they always have since the inception of the party in 1828.

Bush43 was not a good President either, and certainly not a conservative having increased the federal government's size and scope and violating our liberty more than any other President since FDR. I supported attacking Iraq, but we were only suppose to be there to rid ourselves of Saddam Hussein and this terrorist sponsoring Baath Party. Which meant that we should have left Iraq after catching Saddam in December 2003. Instead Democrats complained about how our military was destroying Iraq's infrastructure, so Bush43, in his stupidity to placate Democrat filth, attempted to do nation building before actually winning the war. Which is monumentally stupid from any perspective. Even FDR was smart enough to know you have to win the war first before you can even consider rebuilding a nation, but not Bush43.

 

[yankintx]

Trump Derangement Syndrome

I don't believe being critical of our elected leaders is a mental condition. I would much rather be classed as having TDS than be seen at a Trump rally drooling along with the rest of the rubes when Trump blows his dog whistle.

Ever watch Fox News 2008-2016? Obama could not fart in an elevator and Fox was scolling it as breaking news.

 

[Glitch]

Must be terrible for the insane leftists to find out that the more normal and well adjusted in the nation reject them, which they resoundingly deserve.

That is their modus operandi. Any time they do not get their way in an election, they become violent and destructive. It happened in 2016, 2000, 1980, 1972, and 1968, and you can absolutely count on it happening again and again until something is done to stop it.

The Democratic Party needs to be declared a terrorist organization under Public Law 107-40, have is assets seized, and its leadership locked up in GITMO.

 

[Hawkeye10]

That is their modus operandi. Any time they do not get their way in an election, they become violent and destructive. It happened in 2016, 2000, 1980, 1972, and 1968, and you can absolutely count on it happening again and again until something is done to stop it.

The Democratic Party needs to be declared a terrorist organization under Public Law 107-40, have is assets seized, and its leadership locked up in GITMO.

Violence works....that is what we have been teaching..."Well if they are that upset there must be something to their claims, people would never lie like that!".






barf

 

[Glitch]

LOL...kinda interesting u say that even though u criticize Trump
So what's your biggest gripe?

Trump is one of your ilk. He was a registered Democrat his entire life and only registered as a Republican in 2012 in order to run for election in 2016. Democrats are foaming at the mouth in rage, destroying property, and becoming violent because Trump has an "R" after his name instead of a "D."

I don't vote for leftist filth, regardless of which party they happen to be registered with at the time. If anyone had ever voted for an anti-American POS Democrat candidate at anytime during their life, then they would never get my vote. That included Trump, Romney, McCain, and Bush43.

When the Republican Party stops nominating leftist socialist scum to be President and start nominating conservatives again I may consider voting Republican again, but not until then.

 

[Glitch]

Violence works....that is what we have been teaching..."Well if they are that upset there must be something to their claims, people would never lie like that!".

barf

Except that it doesn't work, as they have demonstrated. All of their violence and destruction of property has never once changed an election result. They are simply mentally immature children throwing a temper tantrum like a two year-old child. As long as the Democratic Party terrorist organization is allowed to exist, there will continue to be destruction of property and violence after every election they lose.

 

[Hawkeye10]

Except that it doesn't work, as they have demonstrated. All of their violence and destruction of property has never once changed an election result. They are simply mentally immature children throwing a temper tantrum like a two year-old child. As long as the Democratic Party terrorist organization is allowed to exist, there will continue to be destruction of property and violence after every election they lose.

Elections have meant increasing less as America has become increasingly corrupt....your sentiments are quaint.

 

[Glitch]

Pre 1967

Pre-1967 you would have to go back to 1952 before you get to a presidential election that the Democrats lost. Adlai Stevenson was almost as bad as George McGovern, losing to Eisenhower by a landslide. Other than the Puerto Rican Nationalist Party revolts of the 1950s, there wasn't any destruction of property or violence after the election that I was able to find. However, keep in mind that we were at war with North Korea at the time and Americans wanted a President who had already won WW II commanding the military, not some bigoted leftist filth like Stevenson.

Also Democrats controlled the House in 1952 and used their House Un-American Activities Committee to violate the First and Fifth Amendment rights of Americans. They try to revise history and blame Senator McCarthy, but he never took any of his investigations beyond the Department of State and the Department of Defense. The Democrats did, and that is why they want to revise history and try to blame Sen. McCarthy.

 

[Hawkeye10]

Pre-1967 you would have to go back to 1952 before you get to a presidential election that the Democrats lost. Adlai Stevenson was almost as bad as George McGovern, losing to Eisenhower by a landslide. Other than the Puerto Rican Nationalist Party revolts of the 1950s, there wasn't any destruction of property or violence after the election that I was able to find. However, keep in mind that we were at war with North Korea at the time and Americans wanted a President who had already won WW II commanding the military, not some bigoted leftist filth like Stevenson.

Also Democrats controlled the House in 1952 and used their House Un-American Activities Committee to violate the First and Fifth Amendment rights of Americans. They try to revise history and blame Senator McCarthy, but he never took any of his investigations beyond the Department of State and the Department of Defense. The Democrats did, and that is why they want to revise history and try to blame Sen. McCarthy.

Ya but when did Democrats decide that they had to win at any cost, that they were willing to do what ever it takes to win no matter how scummy they had to be to get it.

I think 1967 was the year that people really started to not care about decency, that violence is Just Fine And Dandy.

It was later when the Left decided that they did not care about Truth.