• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every persons position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

What another ideology typically does.

What is you view on this?


  • Total voters
    8

tacomancer

Christian Capitalist Social Democrat
Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 8, 2010
Messages
44,171
Reaction score
24,343
Location
Akron
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Progressive
Reading through various posts. I come across a lot of statements that go along the lines of "what a liberal/conservative/libertarian would do is..." than it is follow by some wild and crazy statement that has no basis in what a particular ideology tends to do.

This observation, coupled with the insight that some people lately are coming to realize that the gap between how different ideologies consider things rather large and are not easily bridged makes me wonder if it is a lack of understanding that causes these wild statements moreso than a desire to create a strawman.

What is you view on this?

Now obviously, this does not apply to call cases, but what do you think the cause of the majority of these types of statements are?

Edit:
Here are some typical statements I see.
1. Liberals want the government to create a communist/socialist utopia.

2. Libertarians want to create a society like Somolia.

3. Conservatives have no compassion for the poor.
 
Last edited:

Gardener

free market communist
DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 5, 2005
Messages
26,657
Reaction score
15,927
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Reading through various posts. I come across a lot of statements that go along the lines of "what a liberal/conservative/libertarian would do is..." than it is follow by some wild and crazy statement that has no basis in what a particular ideology tends to do.

This observation, coupled with the insight that some people lately are coming to realize that the gap between how different ideologies consider things are not easily bridged makes me wonder if it is a lack of understanding that causes these wild statements moreso than a desire to create a strawman.

What is you view on this?

Now obviously, this does not apply to call cases, but what do you think the cause of the majority of these types of statements are?

I think there is both a grain of truth and wild misunderstanding with most of these statements.

For instance, when people rail against Liberals, what they describe is seldom the stuff of actual liberals, but of fundamentalist leftists, many of whom CALL themselves liberal. The same goes for those who describe conservatism in terms of bible thumping fundies -- again, people who do call themselves conservative.

I think what is more valuable in terms of political labels by way of identification isn't necessarily how those who do not adhere to an ideology describe a different one, but how those who adhere to an ideology point out the various failings among their own. On this particular board, I see plenty of the more intelligent conservatives distancing themselves from the fire-breathing fundies, but I almost never see those on the left hold up the fire breathing lefties feet to the fire. Just as the right has drifted from some of its core values due to the influence of the neocons (who were disaffected liberals in their origins), so, too, has the left drifted from its liberal roots -- in this case due to those reacting against the neocons and so taking up reactionary positions, as well as the undermining of liberalism by the illiberal multiculturalists.
 

rathi

Count Smackula
DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 10, 2006
Messages
7,890
Reaction score
4,730
Location
California
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
The behavior is used by people who are unable to actually have a real debate. It much easier to make up a wild claim, pretend your opponents political group holds such a claim, and then debate against your fantasy rather than actually addressing your opponents points.
 

Hoplite

Technomancer
DP Veteran
Joined
Feb 6, 2010
Messages
3,779
Reaction score
1,077
Location
California
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Moderate
I think there is both a grain of truth and wild misunderstanding with most of these statements.

For instance, when people rail against Liberals, what they describe is seldom the stuff of actual liberals, but of fundamentalist leftists, many of whom CALL themselves liberal. The same goes for those who describe conservatism in terms of bible thumping fundies -- again, people who do call themselves conservative.

I think what is more valuable in terms of political labels by way of identification isn't necessarily how those who do not adhere to an ideology describe a different one, but how those who adhere to an ideology point out the various failings among their own. On this particular board, I see plenty of the more intelligent conservatives distancing themselves from the fire-breathing fundies, but I almost never see those on the left hold up the fire breathing lefties feet to the fire. Just as the right has drifted from some of its core values due to the influence of the neocons (who were disaffected liberals in their origins), so, too, has the left drifted from its liberal roots -- in this case due to those reacting against the neocons and so taking up reactionary positions, as well as the undermining of liberalism by the illiberal multiculturalists.
I have to agree. I think both sides take the extreme views of the other side and superimpose it on their opponents and while it may be partially true, it's not true across the board.

This is labels biting us in the ass because we listen to people on our own side tell us what "liberal" or "conservative" means and we then assign that value to anyone identifying as such and in the process we miss the subtleties of other people's beliefs.
 

Harry Guerrilla

DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 18, 2008
Messages
28,951
Reaction score
12,422
Location
Not affiliated with other libertarians.
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian
Reading through various posts. I come across a lot of statements that go along the lines of "what a liberal/conservative/libertarian would do is..." than it is follow by some wild and crazy statement that has no basis in what a particular ideology tends to do.

This observation, coupled with the insight that some people lately are coming to realize that the gap between how different ideologies consider things rather large and are not easily bridged makes me wonder if it is a lack of understanding that causes these wild statements moreso than a desire to create a strawman.

What is you view on this?

Now obviously, this does not apply to call cases, but what do you think the cause of the majority of these types of statements are?

Edit:
Here are some typical statements I see.

Lack of understanding, purposeful straw man and ignorant ideologies misrepresenting a belief.
 
Top Bottom