• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every persons position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

What Administraton Had to Say About FISA in 2002

danarhea

Slayer of the DP Newsbot
DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 27, 2005
Messages
43,603
Reaction score
26,254
Location
Houston, TX
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
In 2002, Congress wanted to pass a law loosening the requirements for obtaining FISA warrants. The administration opposed it, stating that the FISA system was working well. The proposal by Mike Dewine of Ohio to loosen the FISA requirements was knocked down by the Justice Department. The proposal itself would have made it easier to obtain warrants to listen in on converstatons of foreign nationals living inside the US.

DeWine's bill would have lowered the "probable cause" standard to one of only "reasonable suspicion" for warrants involving foreigners in the country.
The justice department not only stated that this requirement was not needed, but was also trying to determine whether this loosening of the law would pass Constitutional muster, even though warrants would still be required. Now the administration is trying to claim they can legally do the same thing and more WITHOUT warrants? If you believe that, then I have some property here in Houston I would like to sell you. It used to be called the Astrodome.

Article is here.
 
Top Bottom