First off, everybody knows that I’m a conservative here. So please don’t assume because I make this statement that I’m not one.
My reply is not based on your professed lean or on what you think everyone knows of you, but instead are based on what you posted. It is clear to me that you are just assuming and do not know enough about the subject you are attempting to discuss. I will explain why. To do so I will point to your last statement first.
And even if Obama actually was born in Kenya, he has an American mother; therefore he was still eligible to run for president. But there’s also too much evidence to support that Obama was born in Hawaii.
Your comment here is absolutely incorrect and shows you do not know enough about the subject to even be discussing it.
Under the law at the time he
would not have been born a citizen.
The law at the time required his mother be in the US 10 years prior to the birth (she had been), with at least 5 of those years being after the age of 14 (she wasn't).
She gave birth to Barack at the age of 18. She would have had to be 19 years old for him to have been granted citizenship.
(Not to mention that granting of citizenship by legislation has nothign to do with being a natural born Citizen. Such citizenship attaches after birth, not by birth itself.)
A person born abroad in wedlock to a U.S. citizen and an alien acquires U.S. citizenship at birth if the U.S. citizen parent has been physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions prior to the person’s birth for the period required by the statute in effect when the person was born (INA 301(g), formerly INA 301(a)(7)).
For birth on or after November 14, 1986, the U.S. citizen parent must have been physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for five years prior to the person’s birth, at least two of which were after the age of 14.
For birth between December 24, 1952 and November 13, 1986, the U.S. citizen parent must have been physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for 10 years prior to the person’s birth, at least five of which were after the age of 14 for the person to acquire U.S. citizenship at birth. The U.S. citizen parent must be the genetic or the gestational parent and the legal parent of the child under local law at the time and place of the child’s birth to transmit U.S. citizenship.
eman926 said:
Secondly, Obama being “born in Kenya” is just as much nonsense as [...]
Actually, no.
Whether or not a candidate qualifies is a legitimate issue.
In Obama's case there was a legitimate question because of information he himself released to his literary agency, and newspaper releases.
His literary agency published in 1991 that their client (Obama) was born in Kenya. Newspapers also claimed he had been born in Kenya.
So the question was legitimate.
I know that Trump eventually said that Obama was born in America. The problem is, I still have to debate individuals on Facebook who still say he was “born in Kenya”.
You do not have to debate anyone, regardless of what the President has said about the issue.
Given the suspect information Obama has provided
(instead of his original BC that he claimed he found) and all the evidence and counter claims made, it is not a settled issue by any means.
I do not know if he was or wasn't born in Kenya, but I do know enough evidence exists to suggest he wasn't.
FFS. His own brother reasserted his Kenyan birth as recently as this month.
Regardless of where he was born, there is another argument that is not dependent on that.
Even if he was born in the USA, he was not a natural born citizen.