'We Were Creating A Story -- Our Focus Was To Get Trump Out': CNN Director Busted By Undercover Veritas Operative

[Mashmont]

Yes the truth has a liberal bias no doubt.

Liberalism is a lie in itself.

 

[calamity]

Thanks for confirming what most intelligent people already knew
———

A technical director for CNN made the grave error of sitting down with a (probably hot) undercover female journalist from Project Veritas, to whom he admitted that the network "got Trump out" with their coverage, and that he "100% believe(s) that if it wasn't for CNN, I don't know that Trump would have got voted out."

Zerohedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

Zero Hedge and Veritas....hmm, all we need is a chronic liar like O'Keefe to speak in order to hit the trifecta of dishonesty.

 

[trouble13]

Was Mr. One and done lying when he said this?

“China has been working very hard to contain the Coronavirus. The United States greatly appreciates their efforts and transparency. It will all work out well. In particular, on behalf of the American People, I want to thank President Xi!”

or this?

Late last night, I had a very good talk with President Xi, and we talked about — mostly about the coronavirus. They're working really hard, and I think they are doing a very professional job. They're in touch with World — the World — World Organization. CDC also. We're working together. But World Health is working with them. CDC is working with them. I had a great conversation last night with President Xi. It's a tough situation. I think they're doing a very good job.”
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/04/15/trump-china-coronavirus-188736

The one term mistake was China's fanboy for months but CNN is a big liar for doing the same?

You told me CNN does not lie. I showed you they do

 

[calamity]

You told me CNN does not lie. I showed you they do

Not really

 

[911Sparky]

Name one lie

Ok, I'll do just one. PV tried to set up the Washington Post with a fake story about a woman impregnated by Roy Moore, hoping to get the Post to run it, at which point they would expose the fake story. Unfortunately for PV, the Post did a background check, exposed the story as fake and didn't run it. These are the kind of people you put your faith in? Now, if you are interested in the truth about PV you can research them online, but somehow I don't think you really want to do that, it's easier to
believe the right wing bullshit.

 

[iguanaman]

You told me CNN does not lie. I showed you they do

Mistakes are not lies. Was Mr. One and done lying about China?

 

[Jack Fabulous]

it's easier to
believe the right wing bullshit.

Dude... when asked if you believe CNN when they tell you something you answered:

Yes.

And now you're berating people about "believing right wing bullshit" as if your admission that you think CNN is credible doesn't totally disqualify you from ever being taken seriously by anyone?

Self Awareness. Get some.

 

[911Sparky]

Dude... when asked if you believe CNN when they tell you something you answered:



And now you're berating people about "believing right wing bullshit" as if your admission that you think CNN is credible doesn't totally disqualify you from ever being taken seriously by anyone?

Self Awareness. Get some.

You can start a new thread/ poll, asking the folks on DP which of the two, CNN or PV they would most likely believe. As far as credibility goes, I would stand mine up to yours any day of the week.

 

[Fishking]

Thanks for confirming what most intelligent people already knew
———

A technical director for CNN made the grave error of sitting down with a (probably hot) undercover female journalist from Project Veritas, to whom he admitted that the network "got Trump out" with their coverage, and that he "100% believe(s) that if it wasn't for CNN, I don't know that Trump would have got voted out."

Zerohedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

Zero people are shocked by this, even those who act like they are and/or will most a MediaBias report about Zero Hedge or Project Veritas but not actually respond to the content. Remember, control of the narrative is of prime importance, even if you're blatantly ignoring reality and everyone knows it.

 

[Jack Fabulous]

You can start a new thread/ poll, asking the folks on DP which of the two, CNN or PV they would most likely believe. As far as credibility goes, I would stand mine up to yours any day of the week.

"Mine"?

So CNN is your "go to" source?

 

[Fishking]

I don't think there's a single person in the US who didn't already realize that CNN had a strong anti trump bias, and that they wanted him out of the white house.

I don't see that as a bad thing though. Trump was garbage, and I'm glad they took him out like the trash he is.

You don't think it a bad thing for the news to have such a bias? That they will almost solely play partisan politics?

 

[SCrider]

PV has actual video of leftwingers’ own words. Please explain how that’s PV lying. There can be no better proof of their credibility.

Actual edited and manipulated video.

 

[Jason Warfield]

Sorry, when Project Veritas is mentioned, I immediately know the story is likely bogus.

the organization is repeatedly debunked and caught frequently in editing videos to skew the subject to their point of view.

There is no credibility here.

But I find it interesting that Project Veritas is now in the prostitution business... I feel bad for the girl in question; in future jobs she’s going to have to explain why she isn’t a hooker even though Veritas pimped her out to provide a “girlfriend experience”....

 

[j brown's body]

How could anyone not know that CNN wanted Trump out of office?

 

[Carl Young]

They always support the far right, the conspiracy theories, the accusations against planned parenthood, the attempts to paint any Dems in some sort of "evil" or "look they are socialists, cheating, doing something wrong" light.

What do you mean by 'supporting the far right'?

As far as I know they use videos and interviews and perhaps the people they interview, as with this latest, are actually doing something wrong. Shouldn't that be brought to light?

 

[natman]

Yes the truth has a liberal bias no doubt.

Yes, I have no doubt that whatever you believe is the truth has a liberal bias.

 

[Mashmont]

Ok, I'll do just one. PV tried to set up the Washington Post with a fake story about a woman impregnated by Roy Moore, hoping to get the Post to run it, at which point they would expose the fake story. Unfortunately for PV, the Post did a background check, exposed the story as fake and didn't run it. These are the kind of people you put your faith in? Now, if you are interested in the truth about PV you can research them online, but somehow I don't think you really want to do that, it's easier to
believe the right wing bullshit.

PV's videos have been 100% accurate. Unless you're accusing them of doctoring the videos, dubbing or deleting words in, to make it appear someone said something they didn't.

For example, in the George Zimmerman audio, NBC deleted a dispatcher's words, where he asked George Zimmerman if the perpetrator was black. When Zimmerman, answered "he was black', it made it sound like Zimmerman had initiated the topic of race, instead of answering a question.

Do you have evidence Project Veritas did anything like that?

 

[Mashmont]

Actual edited and manipulated video.

Let see proof of that.

 

[911Sparky]

PV's videos have been 100% accurate. Unless you're accusing them of doctoring the videos, dubbing or deleting words in, to make it appear someone said something they didn't.

For example, in the George Zimmerman audio, NBC deleted a dispatcher's words, where he asked George Zimmerman if the perpetrator was black. When Zimmerman, answered "he was black', it made it sound like Zimmerman had initiated the topic of race, instead of answering a question.

Do you have evidence Project Veritas did anything like that?
[/QUOTE
There is no point in having a discussion with someone who refuses to look at the unvarnished truth. If you look at the Wikipedia page you will see enough information
to make you rethink your position, if you are an honest person looking for the truth. If however you are looking to support your beliefs, then look no further. I'm done here, have a good day.

 

[Mashmont]

So, no evidence.

 

[911Sparky]

So, no evidence.

I gave you evidence, you just refuse to look at it, therefore I can't help you anymore.

 

[roguenuke]

What do you mean by 'supporting the far right'?

As far as I know they use videos and interviews and perhaps the people they interview, as with this latest, are actually doing something wrong. Shouldn't that be brought to light?

Normally, they lie and trick people into saying all sorts of things, a lot of the time not what they claim (due to strategic editing of questions asked and context) and then present it as "gotcha". Like this one.

What exactly did this guy say that was illegal? Or was what he said they were doing just "wrong"? If just "wrong", couldn't he have been bragging to the honeypot?

 

[iguanaman]

Yes, I have no doubt that whatever you believe is the truth has a liberal bias.

Yes I know...."Q" knows all.. Not to mention Rudy. He gets his info from the top men in the GRU. Nothing but the best for Mr. One and done.

 

[ecofarm]

There is no evidence, unlike CNN, that there is any Fox 'agenda'.

That doesn't mean that no errors are made, but it is not a network 'agenda'. They have many opinions coming from all directions and you're not likely to see that much on CNN or MSNBC, One problem for Fox is that few leftists are willing to appear.

lol

 

[lurchadams]

Thanks for confirming what most intelligent people already knew
———

A technical director for CNN made the grave error of sitting down with a (probably hot) undercover female journalist from Project Veritas, to whom he admitted that the network "got Trump out" with their coverage, and that he "100% believe(s) that if it wasn't for CNN, I don't know that Trump would have got voted out."

Zerohedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

If true, CNN did this country a service.