Still looking for substance. Not seeing any.
Yes. Your post was full of ignorance and melodrama, and thus devoid of valid/relevant content.
no, plenty of drama (no, not MELOdrama, a aesthetic principle you might like to research before you use the term again) but not ignorance. you see, ignorance is a lack of knowledge and nothing can be full of a lack of anything. but, that aside, a post cannot be ignorant.... the poster is capable of knowledge, not the post. but, perhaps you wanted to avoid the slap of a moderator? by characterizing me THROUGH the my post... very clever of you. Still, you might want to wait until i demonstrate an actual lack of knowledge. You could have nailed me on the ammo... i did not know what your ammo was actually capable of (i deduced the United States Government Issue part). No idea what "centerfire" meant... but that is not much of a lack of knowledge is it... i mean among those of us who are not obsessed with our abilities to kill others?
so, you do not claim it lacks content, now, only that YOU feel the content lacks relevance or validity? well, that of course, is subjective. i think that the ease with which you purchase high powered ammunition and the prevalence of guns in criminal (and accidental) deaths is relevant. i think too, that the obsession americans have with guns and ammunition provides the makers of these materials with wealth and power and thereby a means for arming our enemies... the liberty you speak of is more centered on THEIR profitability than your safety.
oh, and thanks for the spelling corrections but I fixed the spelling errors before doing the research necessary to respond more fully ... you may note that all my posts have an edit.... because i care.
re:
Centerfire cartridges are more powerful since they can hold higher pressures than a similar rimfire cartridge, thus they also are more efficient for their size. For target shooting purposes, centerfire cartridges are more expensive, but for applications involving the hunting of large game they are the best choice.
well... i suppose People are pretty large.
but, according to the best sources i can find, including the National Criminal Justice Reference Service, your proposition that "Almost every ceterfire [sic] rifle round will defeat most kevlar body armor, including standard soft-point hunting rounds." is far from true.
To date, body armor has not been known to fail to prevent the penetration of a bullet constituting a threat equal to or less than the protection rating of the armor
the key being wearing armor appropriate to the threat. the lowest rated, Type I
protects against .22 long rifle lead round nose bullets, with nominal masses of 40 grain impacting at a minimum velocity of 1050 ft/s or less, and against .380 ACP full metal jacketed round nose with nominal masses of 95gr impacting at a minimum velocity of 1025 ft/s.
not enough, i am sure, to protect a ballsy fella like yerself against the profound threats you must face (oops... sorry...) and i suppose that falls out under your qualifying "almost". Too, of course, you were specific about "Kevlar" protection. I gotta admit, i just grabbed that as the most common identifier. i know, of course that new ceramic materials provide much better protection.
still, according to the NCJR, a Level II kevlar vest will stop a USGI 5.56. and Kevlar makes Level III material as well, so, i would say that your ammo, while impressive, ain't gonna stop the U.S. SEALS when the criminal Obama sends them swooping in through your chimbley.
as to the 2nd amendment... be back shortly,
geo.