Sorry for the delay but it wasn't my fault, I wasn't able to login and saw the following inscription: "in order to login administrator maust include your domain to the whitelist" which happaens usually after 2-3 days of my posting to this forum.
("evil hackers" jokes it must be
)
TrajanOctavian said:
WTF are you talking about? AQ is not and has never been a CIA asset. Where do you come up with this stuff, stay off the conspiracy websites man.
Again you suggest me to trust your honest word or you think that if you’ll repeat a statement many times it will become truth regardless any verifiable matters?
OK, here are the consideration that Al-Qaeda is a CIA asset. What is the meaning of “Al-Qaeda”, do you know?
It means data-base in Arabic. Data-base of Mudjaheddin who were hired by CIA agent Osama bin-Laden to fight against USSR in Afghanistan. It is known overall, Bush administration sources also don’t deny this.
After 9-11-2001 someone who pretends he is Osama bin-Laden or perhaps this very Osama himself (why not?) takes responsibility for it. Taking into consideration that 9-11-2001 was inside job (no denial here, controlled demolitions don’t occur from office fires) and regarding astonishing cover-up that Bush administration provided for susceptible persons like first of all Larry Silverstein, we can conclude that Bush administration was (at least) the part of 9-11 cabal. Therefore, a person who takes responsibility for it and whose responsibility is accepted by the counterpart must be rather trusted and reliable one to this administration. “Former” CIA agent (there is a saying that there are no “former” special servicemen) fits good, doesn’t he?
Therefore, I cannot trust the tales of Al-Qaeda as something different from the CIA controlled group.
…we conquered Iraq in less than a week, it took like 3 days to capture Baghdad…
So what, it is the great difference between occupying of a land and full control over it. Only the last month you’ve lost a hundred killed (officially!) with all of this sects being busy killing each other and paying relatively less attention to the Americans. Imagine, what it would be if they were united against occupation!? Now you are struggling predominantly against Sunni and only Mukhtada as-Sadr Shia group (which is relatively passive), imagine what it would be if all of the Shia population including their Badr brigades would be against occupation forces. Roughly, it would have been at least four Rottweillers added to the Sunni Bull terrier!
Uncle Sam wouldn’t just dare invade in this case! So you counted on sectarian tensions from the very beginning (I’ve read several American articles in which this case was discussed in the terms of who will inside Iraq oppose aggression and who will not), and
you managed to turn them into the sectarian violence at a critical moment in hope to save your forces.
Now look, I’ve lost some time to proof my last statement, using only the sources those are reliable for you:
There is certain Andrew Krepinevich US Army colonel (definitely non-Islamist) who proposed his famous report “Thin green line”
late 2005.
Here for example about it:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2006/01/24/national/w133017S88.DTL
“Stretched by frequent troop rotations to Iraq and Afghanistan, the Army has become a "thin green line" that could snap unless relief comes soon, according to a study for the Pentagon”. This, for example, paper is dated
January 24, 2006.
The papers like that I’ve cited (there were numerous of such world wide)indicate understanding of a problem, discussion of the topic and search for solution.
Then what we read about sectarian violence in Iraq:
"The sharp rise in sectarian attacks, abductions and killings that followed the bombing of the holy Shi'a shrine in Samarra's Golden Mosque
in February 2006 has presented Iraq with an explosive problem: sectarian-induced displacement".
http://www.brook.edu/fp/projects/idp/200610_DisplacementinIraq.htm
Solution was found and its implementation began after 2-3 month of discussion and planning. Which is just the proper time.
“Purely accidentally” you’ll say?!