Explain, then, why some states have written trigger laws preventing abortion with no exceptions which means even to save the life of the mother. If both have equal rights why can the state mandate that the mother can die in order to allow the child to be born. And since, with the exception of trans men, no men are capable of having a child, they have even greater rights than either the woman or the child since they have no chance of dying due to a life-threatening pregnancy or difficult delivery.
Trans men or not do not have the ability to become pregnant. They can put an object inside the surgically that is an embryo. But, that is not becoming pregnant. To get the baby out, they have to do a C-section and never will be able to deliver naturally. Leave this out of the abortion question because abortion activists are only concerned with women's rights to abortion. You are trying to convolute the debate for your pleasure. So, back to the important part of your question:
Why did the SCOTUS in 1973 write a law by overreaching their constitutional right as a court that women can have abortions at all? Even then, the SC said that they believed it would be done in very rare cases when they wrote it. So, what has changed. Casey's Court decision opened abortion up to 2nd and 3rd trimester possibilities. States then began writing laws to limit this grotesque murdering of innocent unborn children. Some have gone beyond that and as you pointed out not allowing abortion for any reason including rape, incest and the health of the mother. But, that isn't the issue that pro choice advocates have used. They have used other tests to decide when abortion should be legal such as is the heart beating, are their brain waves, does the child feel pain and so on. None of these reasons solves the problem of when an unborn has their unalienable rights as the Declaration of Independence says so. If you believe that ALL mankind is created with equal rights, the key is the word "created" whether this is a Creator God or not. So, I ask, when is a person created? The simple answer is at conception. Therefore logically our unalienable rights begin at conception of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Consideration of both the mother and newly created life at conception have to be considered if you believe we are all created equal. The laws then should consider both the child and mother. Pro life advocates have attempted over time to only consider the mother and never the child. The mother has a right to life as well as the child. They both should have the right to liberty as well. And, the pursuit of happiness both have this right too. If you believe in democracy then the courts aren't the answer as Ruth Ginsberg also stated before her death. Roe v Wade should have been sent back to the states where the decision should be the people of the states.
I know I'm getting long here and I don't like those who write forever posts. But, I believe I've logically concluded that it is up to the rights of the states within the United States of America by it's founding documents and the Constitution. Personally, I don't agree with not allowing abortions in cases of the health of the mother because she also has a right to life. And, if rape or incest is involved, the mother has a right to not being subject to raising a child knowing who the father is and the child's right to not have a rapist, brother, uncle or father for a father. But, the inconvenience reason I reject because the child still has the right to life regardless if it's an inconvenience to the mother. Give the child up for adoption or let the grandparents raise the child if they want to. Or, maybe even the father of the child. I watched the girlfriend of a friend of mine kill the unborn child when he wanted to raise the child with his mother's support. All because the girlfriend's mother didn't like him because he had negro blood in him. Horrible! She was Korean. Horrible!
By the way, I'm not against contraception either. Just let the teenagers parents know and make the decisions with their child and not keep it a secret with the schools. Schools have become too powerful over the parents recently. This has to stop.