You just have to watch. :mrgreen:
"Did the white house or Sec. Clinton ever ignore reports concerning the attack on Benghazi?"
Nobody ever said they did... They received them all right, but it was their lack of response that was the issue.
And it's YOU who put politiccs ahead of the TRUTH. You are doing EXACTLY what you accuse me of doing so often. You also show you are a piss-poor judge of the media.Grayson is a complete and total tool... a political laughing stock and an American disgrace. The first words out of his mouth prove it.
I love the phony questions he asks... You know Pete, the ones you think have conservatives shaking in their boots... LMAO:
"Who's decision was it to go into Benghazi" and "Did Clinton have to approve him doing so?"
This is Grayson's pathetic attempt to blame the ambassador for his own death... What a jerk.
"Was there any money appropriated for Benghazi that wasn't spent?"
Who cares... The ambassador himself requested more security and was ignored.
"Is it possible to provide the same security in Benghazi as with a regular embassy?"
Nobody ever expected they could... That is totally irrelevant and designed to fool weak minded partisans and the boobs in the main stream media into believing nothing could have been done to protect those people.
"Did the white house or Sec. Clinton ever ignore reports concerning the attack on Benghazi?"
Nobody ever said they did... They received them all right, but it was their lack of response that was the issue.
As far as I'm concerned, Grayson can go to straigh to hell.
You just have to watch. :mrgreen:
This type of questioning seems childish to me.
Man, these questions are so-o-o rehearsed and formulated it is a disgrace. The whore is covering her fat ass to get ready for the election.
Grayson is a complete and total tool... a political laughing stock and an American disgrace. The first words out of his mouth prove it.
I love the phony questions he asks... You know Pete, the ones you think have conservatives shaking in their boots... LMAO:
"Who's decision was it to go into Benghazi" and "Did Clinton have to approve him doing so?"
This is Grayson's pathetic attempt to blame the ambassador for his own death... What a jerk.
"Was there any money appropriated for Benghazi that wasn't spent?"
Who cares... The ambassador himself requested more security and was ignored.
"Is it possible to provide the same security in Benghazi as with a regular embassy?"
Nobody ever expected they could... That is totally irrelevant and designed to fool weak minded partisans and the boobs in the main stream media into believing nothing could have been done to protect those people.
"Did the white house or Sec. Clinton ever ignore reports concerning the attack on Benghazi?"
Nobody ever said they did... They received them all right, but it was their lack of response that was the issue.
As far as I'm concerned, Grayson can go to straigh to hell.
anyone have any information proving the answers to grayson's questions to be other than truthful?
Truthful questions? Really?
You just have to watch. :mrgreen:
read it again
i was asking if there is any information showing the answers to grayson's questions were other than truthful
John McCain ran a negative campaign, he LOST! Mitt Romney ran a negative campaign and he LOST! Bring it on!!!The Benghazi cover up will be successful but when Hillary runs for pres the clips of her talking about a youtube movie and a demonstration that got out of hand will come back to haunt her.
the truth of the benghazi matterWhat are you after?
which is why i asked the question ... what about his statements is other than factual?The whole thing was the word of an administration official.
you have been amazingly quiet in reply to my request for information showing the answers to grayson's questions were in any way in errorSure we're telling the truth, just ask.
The Benghazi cover up will be successful but when Hillary runs for pres the clips of her talking about a youtube movie and a demonstration that got out of hand will come back to haunt her.