• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Watch: CNN Hosts Devastated As Another Russia Scoop Collapses

zimmer

Educating the Ignorant
Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 19, 2008
Messages
24,380
Reaction score
7,805
Location
Worldwide
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Conservative
[FONT=&quot]However, the most memorable reaction came from counterterrorism analyst Phil Mudd, who delivered an admirably lucid soliloquty on CNN Tonight with Don Lemon during the 11:00 p.m. EST hour. Evidently fed up with seeing yet another narrative based solely on speculation collapse as more evidence surfaced, Mudd chided Senate Democrats for “hanging their hat” on “a couple of unidentified phone calls a few years ago” in the first place:[/FONT]

DON LEMON: That doesn't mean Don Junior didn't tell the president some other way, correct?

PHIL MUDD: Sure. But let me give you an eye roll-on this one, Don, at 11:11 p.m. on the East Coast. We are two-plus years into an investigation using the best resources in the Department of Justice and FBI.

The question is not simply malfeasance on the financial side. The question is whether there was a conspiracy like we've never seen with the Russians. And the Democrats are hanging their hat on unidentified, a couple of unidentified phone calls a few years ago? Are you kidding me?


https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/n...nn-hosts-grapple-latest-russia-disappointment




Not a fan of Mudd, but he gets this spot on.

It was funny watching the CNN collective squirm.
 
The real Russian collusion began with the Hillary reset button and the sale of uranium to Putin. Putin made a lot of money off this sale and gave the Clinton foundation $20M dollars. The Hillary E-mail server was part of the evidence. This was destroyed to hide evidence. Comey exonerates Hillary without any investigation. What followed was an example of blaming someone else to hide the real collusion.

The analogy is an older brother breaks a family heirloom. The older brother knows he is in trouble, so he blames his younger brother. The younger brother is innocent, but he is caught off guard, when he is thrown under the bus. His defense of innocence, although sincere, is not as convincing as the intrigue of the elaborate scheme to frame him. Everyone then rushes to judgement, being fed propaganda by the friends of the older brother, who try to cover up for the older brother. One by one, these friends get caught up in their lies. Finally one day CNN figures out they have been used. They missed the biggest story since Watergate.

The Obama FBI did a trial run a few year back, releasing false intel to the media, to see who in the media would bite. CNN took the bait and from then on and have been ruining their reputations, working overtime without pay chasing butterflies. CNN needs to read John Solomon from the Hill. He is way ahead of the curve and has all the evidence and plot line; Pulitzer Prize in Journalism.
 
Not a fan of Mudd, but he gets this spot on.

It was funny watching the CNN collective squirm.

It is always good to see some common sense injected into the leftist news media hair-on-fire propagandist narratives.
 
Not a fan of Mudd, but he gets this spot on.

It was funny watching the CNN collective squirm.

Don Lemon :lamo

Shhhhhh...... you are not black enough to criticize him according to some liberals on here.
 
Mueller knows everything.
 
That video was hilarious.


When even uber Trump hater Mudd says he's giving you an eye roll and proceeds to lambast the 2 year investigation, you know it's pretty bad for liberals and their witch hunt.
 
That video was hilarious.


When even uber Trump hater Mudd says he's giving you an eye roll and proceeds to lambast the 2 year investigation, you know it's pretty bad for liberals and their witch hunt.

/// witch hunt //// :2rofll: :liar2
 
Howard Schultz, Please Don’t Run for President
A bid by an ex-chief of Starbucks would be reckless idiocy.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/28/opinion/howard-schultz-president.html

Love how the NYT runs this ASAP. Can you imagine them running an OpEd if it was an R running as an I?

Contrary to the OpEd... it’s only reckless of you support dimwitted Socialists.

I really love Schultzy... he’s already done a wonderful job taking on and exposing the radical Left. He’s provided great sound bites that can be used against his own party and their dimwitted, economic ideas.

Same for Bloomberg.

Wonderful... two Democrats espousing some fiscal sanity, with deep pockets who can make as deep a run as they want in 2020... and help destroy the Leftist radicals running.

Bravo!!!
 
Not a fan of Mudd, but he gets this spot on.

It was funny watching the CNN collective squirm.

Perhaps you can bother to illustrate "the CNN collective," whatever the hell that is, "squirming?"

What you provide in the OP is a CNN host asking a question and receiving a response to it. That's it. There's no squirming in that.
 
Back
Top Bottom