In case you didn't notice I started this thread, therefore, I'd hardly be Trump.
Look, this thread is about Trump's history of insulting the US military and its member5s. It isn't about you.
Then stop trying to make it be so while campaigning to shift the blame.
Then again your thread did go south right from the start.
Ruined as soon as your chum came flying like a bat into hell. He does that. It's his forte'.
Describing the stunned silence in the room after the president's diatribe, the book said: "So many people in that room had gone to war and risked their lives for their country, and now they were being dressed down by a president who had not. They felt sick to their stomachs."
Then stop trying to make it be so while campaigning to shift the blame.
Then again your thread did go south right from the start.
Ruined as soon as your chum came flying like a bat into hell. He does that. It's his forte'.
I was never much impressed by the M-60 design. It eats its own operating rod by design.
This is more impressive:
Browning arranged a test at the Springfield Armory in May 1917.[3]:176 In the first test, the weapon fired 20,000 rounds with only a few malfunctions mostly related to poorly loaded cloth belts. The reliability was exceptional, so Browning fired another 20,000 rounds through the weapon with one broken part: a broken sear at about 39,500. The Ordnance Board was impressed, but was unconvinced that the same level of performance could be achieved in a production model. Consequently, Browning used a second gun that not only duplicated the original trial, but it also fired continuously for 48 minutes and 12 seconds (over 21,000 rounds).
M1917 Browning machine gun - Wikipedia
You and Trump.
Your thread fast became a book of entries for anecdotal reminiscences, weapons chatter and war stories.
Your mission should you choose to accept it is to address your own topic of the thread.
You've got your hands full on it given your thread went bust right after the getgo. In other words you and your topic are less than compelling.
The thread is a complete bust.
It is focused on one poster only among several who have ignored the OP and who've had no intention or interest in pursuing it or developing it. The OP is a leader in focusing on the one poster while accommodating the off topic wanderings of the other posters involved.
The only reason I can't say the thread is a goner is because the thread never arrived to begin with.
Last one out turn off the lights plse thx.
:2wave:
Thx again.
The thread is a complete bust.
It is focused on one poster only among several who have ignored the OP and who've had no intention or interest in pursuing it or developing it. The OP is a leader in focusing on the one poster while accommodating the off topic wanderings of the other posters involved.
The only reason I can't say the thread is a goner is because the thread never arrived to begin with.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?