• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Washington Post Lies About Lawmaker's Biblical Reference

My post #27

Which was....

Personally I find the order to sell everything and give the proceeds to the needy or else you wont be allowed to follow the Lord to be a fine example of "forced redistribution"

The actual parable is here (Luke's version):


The point of the parable is that the rich young ruler was eager to inherit eternal life and so asked Jesus what he must do. He checked off all of the "I'm a good guy" steps, but he couldn't give up what he loved most --- material possessions. Jesus' point was that you can't be in love with your possessions so much that you wouldn't give them up in order to gain eternal life.

That parable also has literally NOTHING to do with government and everything to do with what you'll sacrifice for Him.

Would you like to try again?
 
Last edited:
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…