• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Washington Post Awards Hillary Four Pinocchios

Jack Hays

Traveler
Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 28, 2013
Messages
94,823
Reaction score
28,342
Location
Williamsburg, Virginia
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
The Washington Post's Fact Checker has awarded Hillary Clinton four Pinocchios for her claim that FBI Director Comey found her email claims to be truthful. Four Pinocchios is the rating for the very most dishonest claims.

Clinton’s claim that the FBI director said her email answers were ‘truthful’


Clinton earns Four Pinocchios for mischaracterizing the FBI director's remarks about her email setup.

Glenn Kessler | Politics | Jul 31, 2016

. . . As we have seen repeatedly in Clinton’s explanations of the email controversy, she relies on excessively technical and legalistic answers to explain her actions. While Comey did say there was no evidence she lied to the FBI, that is not the same as saying she told the truth to the American public — which was the point of Wallace’s question. Comey has repeatedly not taken a stand on her public statements.
And although Comey did say many emails were retroactively classified, he also said that there were some emails that were already classified that should not have been sent on an unclassified, private server. That’s the uncomfortable truth that Clinton has trouble admitting.

Four Pinocchios

pinocchio_4.jpg
 
The Washington Post's Fact Checker has awarded Hillary Clinton four Pinocchios for her claim that FBI Director Comey found her email claims to be truthful. Four Pinocchios is the rating for the very most dishonest claims.

Clinton’s claim that the FBI director said her email answers were ‘truthful’


Clinton earns Four Pinocchios for mischaracterizing the FBI director's remarks about her email setup.

Glenn Kessler | Politics | Jul 31, 2016

. . . As we have seen repeatedly in Clinton’s explanations of the email controversy, she relies on excessively technical and legalistic answers to explain her actions. While Comey did say there was no evidence she lied to the FBI, that is not the same as saying she told the truth to the American public — which was the point of Wallace’s question. Comey has repeatedly not taken a stand on her public statements.
And although Comey did say many emails were retroactively classified, he also said that there were some emails that were already classified that should not have been sent on an unclassified, private server. That’s the uncomfortable truth that Clinton has trouble admitting.

Four Pinocchios

pinocchio_4.jpg

In a contest of Clinton vs. Trump we probably shouldn't engage in a tallying of the WP or Politifact truth telling stats.
 
I heard that comment from her on CNN today and I literally laughed out loud. It was such a blatant lie, a lie on the level Donald Trump would tell.
 
inb4 Hill Shills come and try to say she didn't lie.
 
Four Pinocchios. Bengazi. Claiming she was shot at.

If only the Republicans hadn't nominated someone even worse.
 
The Washington Post's Fact Checker has awarded Hillary Clinton four Pinocchios for her claim that FBI Director Comey found her email claims to be truthful. Four Pinocchios is the rating for the very most dishonest claims.

Clinton’s claim that the FBI director said her email answers were ‘truthful’


Clinton earns Four Pinocchios for mischaracterizing the FBI director's remarks about her email setup.

Glenn Kessler | Politics | Jul 31, 2016

. . . As we have seen repeatedly in Clinton’s explanations of the email controversy, she relies on excessively technical and legalistic answers to explain her actions. While Comey did say there was no evidence she lied to the FBI, that is not the same as saying she told the truth to the American public — which was the point of Wallace’s question. Comey has repeatedly not taken a stand on her public statements.
And although Comey did say many emails were retroactively classified, he also said that there were some emails that were already classified that should not have been sent on an unclassified, private server. That’s the uncomfortable truth that Clinton has trouble admitting.

Four Pinocchios

pinocchio_4.jpg

There's nothing new here... Hillary is liar and it's patently obvious that dishonesty and corruption in government is appealing to the left.

.
 
There's nothing new here... Hillary is liar and it's patently obvious that dishonesty and corruption in government is appealing to the left.

.

and, apparently, the leftist Donald Trump is appealing to the right. Go figure.
 
and, apparently, the leftist Donald Trump is appealing to the right. Go figure.

As bad as Trump is, that only proves how bad of a candidate the Hildabeast is.

Trump could go on stage and light babies on fire, and it STILL wouldn't be as bad as that crook Hillary.
 
As bad as Trump is, that only proves how bad of a candidate the Hildabeast is.

Trump could go on stage and light babies on fire, and it STILL wouldn't be as bad as that crook Hillary.

And he just might.
But, he's already far surpassed Hillary Clinton on the not qualified to be president scale.
 
I regard them as equally unacceptable.

So, who are you voting for?

Voting third party so you can vote against them both? That's what I plan to do, but then, the outcome of the election in California is already a given.
 
Back
Top Bottom