- Joined
- Apr 26, 2013
- Messages
- 2,422
- Reaction score
- 284
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Very Liberal
Yep. The United States government, history, and reality back me up on that.
Not only did you just present an opinion as fact, I'm pretty sure you even screwed up the faux-fact you were tryin to say by mixing up Bin Laden and Saddam.
Nope, SCOTUS stepped into a STATE election and overruled a STATE SUPREME COURT DECISION... Thus Dubya...
Nope, SCOTUS stepped into a STATE election and overruled a STATE SUPREME COURT DECISION... Thus Dubya...
Actually, the Shrub was much more of a traditional conservative, the neocons, PNAC, was the Cheney/Wolfowitz/Rumsfeld cabal, who Shrub distanced himself from throughout his second term.You seem to be misinformed, were you one of the misinformed who voted for Obama ?
G.W. Bush is not a conservative, he's a neoconservative.
Do you know what a neoconservative is ? They use to be the liberal base of the Democrat Party.
You're definitely not a politico.
Nope, SCOTUS stepped into a STATE election and overruled a STATE SUPREME COURT DECISION... Thus Dubya...
Sorry, I don't think the Vid means what you think it does. Kinda like Vids of Barney Frank out of context with Dubya's GSE's failures!
Who are you trying to convince other than yourself?
Right, AFTER they had stopped the count? THREE days later they came out with the decision, lol
STATES RIGHTS?
and the florida SCOFLAW ignored the findings of fact (now that was a real wake up call how corrupt those 7 Dem judges were) of SEVEN DIFFERENT COURTS THAT ALL RULE FOR BUSH
no court-Bush wins.
Right, AFTER they had stopped the count? THREE days later they came out with the decision, lol
STATES RIGHTS?
Actually, the Shrub was much more of a traditional conservative, the neocons, PNAC, was the Cheney/Wolfowitz/Rumsfeld cabal, who Shrub distanced himself from throughout his second term.
The Federal Government has jurisdiction over federal elections, and the SCOTUS is the surpreme court in the land as it relates to things under federal jurisdiction. I'm sorry your dislike the method in which our government and court systems function...your dislike doesn't change reality.
Bush won the 2000 election, that is Fact....and in this case, I am actually using that word correctly.
Federal elections are administered by state and local governments, although the specifics of how elections are conducted differ between the states. The Constitution and laws of the United States grant the states wide latitude in how they administer elections.
SCOTUS handed the election to Dubya
So wait, I'm confused...are you "LOL"ing because you're now moving the goal posts over your idiotic comment and now falling back on conspiracy theories that it was "stolen" as opposed to suggesting he didn't win it?
You really need to get your hyper partisan bull**** talking points straight before you start pushing them, it's really hurting your attempt to foolishly engage in this conversation.
George W. Bush won the 2000 election. Once again, hate to break it to you, that's fact.
EMANICPATION PROCOLOMATION!
GREEN BANANA'S!
TITTY SPRINKLES!
We are just yelling out random things right? That's what you were going for there? Or were you trying to make a point?
Wide latitude, but not soul dominion.
No, they handled the court case that determined Florida's electoral count.
Bush having the larger electoral total than Gore is what handed him the election.
[quoteI'm shocked you think the SCOTUS had ANY rights there
May I disagree to the extent that when speaking of the Gulf war and decisions, that this has been an ongoing US problem since the time of carter, or earlier? Past decisions reflect to current happening. Even changing variables for the economy need relative comparisons at time.That has nothing to do with this extended discussion of Clinton.
My understanding of the court decision was the SC told Florida it had to follow it's own election laws, which made Bush the winner.Wide latitude, but not soul dominion.
No, they handled the court case that determined Florida's electoral count.
Bush having the larger electoral total than Gore is what handed him the election.
Why? Because you're amazingly bigoted towards anyone with "conservative" listed as a lean and thus make prejudiced judgements on them based on hyperbolic stereotypes you've created in your head?
Federal Election. SCOTUS deemed they had authority to make the decision. SCOTUS made their decision. The electoral votes went to Bush. Bush had the larger total. Bush won the election. I'm sorry you're annoyed by facts...but a hyper partisans annoyance by fact doesn't make them non-existant.
Bush won the 2000 election.
Cute, you are going to get distracted from my pointing out that the Shrub was not a true Vulcan....because you are confused about W's various nicknames.How did "Shrub" come into this discussion ?
I don't even think Shrubnose has even chimed in on the thread.
My understanding of the court decision was the SC told Florida it had to follow it's own election laws, which made Bush the winner.
Part of post 439 warning:
May I disagree to the extent that when speaking of the Gulf war and decisions, that this has been an ongoing US problem since the time of carter, or earlier? Past decisions reflect to current happening. Even changing variables for the economy need relative comparisons at time.
Saddam was not in charge of US foreign policy. Is it a good idea to allow people like him to control yer actions?
>>While I think the war was not the best idea, I can understand how it happened, and if Saddam wasn't such a thorn in the side of the WORLD, then maybe this would have never happened.
A thorn in the side can be preferable to some other alternatives. A terrible price has been and is being paid to remove that thorn.
Something being weird doesn't cause it to cease existing, just as implying something stupid doesn't cause something to exist....like implying Bush didn't win the election in 2000.
You keep posting a link, but all that link keeps doing is confirming that Bush won the election.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?