• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Was "Able Danger' More GOP Lies? (1 Viewer)

Do You Believe That "Able Danger" Was Fact or Fiction?

  • Other - Please Explain

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    5

26 X World Champs

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Mar 6, 2005
Messages
7,536
Reaction score
429
Location
Upper West Side of Manhattan (10024)
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Liberal
How many times have we read the erroneous claims by the rabid right wingers in this community about "Able Danger"? Over and over again! The BS was slung out as "proof" that the 9-11 bombers had been identified by intel....all untrue...all Republican hogwash to try to defer blame.

Please vote....but read this tidbit from the AP today first...I betcha there's going to be some of you refuting this latest Pentagon report the same way some of you did the recent report that clearly stated there wasn't any connection between AQ & Iraq...

Pentagon report refutes pre-9/11 intel claim
‘Able Danger’ did not know enough to stop hijackers,
defense official says

Updated: 6:39 p.m. ET Sept 21, 2006

WASHINGTON - A Pentagon report rejects the idea that intelligence gathered by a secret military unit could have been used to stop the Sept. 11 hijackings.

The Pentagon inspector general’s office said Thursday that a review of records from the unit, known as Able Danger, found no evidence it had identified ringleader Mohamed Atta or any other terrorist who participated in the 2001 attacks.
Source: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14941373/
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom