• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Warren Escalates Trump Attacks

Choosing her as running mate would be a huge blunder. She doesn't need the support of the radical left. Even Obama figured that out and cast them aside like a used whore. The best strategy for Hilary is to ignore Sanders, ignore his followers and ignore any thoughts of smoking a peace pipe with the Cherokee Princess.



Surrealistik said:
Warren as VP would be a definite misstep for Clinton if her aim is party unity; the why should be obvious: it would make EW's refusal to endorse Bernie in Mass, (which absolutely cost him the state) look like a deliberate, bona fide betrayal of her principles (as the other prominent true progressive and Bernie's most likely successor) in exchange for a place on Hillary's ticket.
Click to expand...
 
TobyOne said:
Choosing her as running mate would be a huge blunder. She doesn't need the support of the radical left. Even Obama figured that out and cast them aside like a used whore. The best strategy for Hilary is to ignore Sanders, ignore his followers and ignore any thoughts of smoking a peace pipe with the Cherokee Princess.
Click to expand...

Except Obama didn't cast aside the 'radical' left (or in otherwords, FDR style progressives which can only ever be at all claimed 'radical' in the thoroughly perverse context of present day America) until _after_ the federal election; his entire platform, the thing that allowed him to win in 2008, was one of reform, change and big ideas, the majority of which were couched in the progressive wing of the Democratic party.
 
The left doesn't have reform, change or big ideas. They just have GroupThink and tired leftists ideology. Obama ran as a racial populist and he tried to govern like one but failed. It was doomed from the beginning. In the general election of 2008 he made several moves to the center, which is what Hilary will do.

Surrealistik said:
Except Obama didn't cast aside the 'radical' left (or in otherwords, FDR style progressives which can only ever be at all claimed 'radical' in the thoroughly perverse context of present day America) until _after_ the federal election; his entire platform, the thing that allowed him to win in 2008, was one of reform, change and big ideas, the majority of which were couched in the progressive wing of the Democratic party.
Click to expand...
 
Gina said:
If "Lieyawatha" is the hardest punch anyone can throw at Elizabeth, it isn't much. Her credibility is head and shoulders above Trump's non-stop lying, flip-flopping, juvenile antics. He's the least qualified person to ever run for president.
Click to expand...
She flat out committed fraud to get a cushy minority scholarship to Harvard. Even with that elite education the woman spews obvious BS to anyone with a basic grasp of free market economics. Fraud is a pretty damning punch.
 
TobyOne said:
The left doesn't have reform, change or big ideas. They just have GroupThink and tired leftists ideology. Obama ran as a racial populist and he tried to govern like one but failed. It was doomed from the beginning. In the general election of 2008 he made several moves to the center, which is what Hilary will do.
Click to expand...

Haha, alright; there is clearly nothing to be gained in conversing with someone so rabidly hyperpartisan; have a good one.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom