• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Warnings on the dangers of NOT aborting?

Abortion is so safe we have to warn women about the medical risks ;) :2wave:


Who is "we"?
You and Doughgirl?
There are no significant "medical risks" (unlike with pregnancy and childbirth).
Ergo, you find it necessary to invent false ones ("Post-Traumatic Abortion Syndrome", "increased risk of breast cancer").
But whatever.
You can tell women all the bullshit stories you want; it still isn't going to stop them from ending pregnancies if they don't want to be pregnant.
 
What irony?
I never said "This is an oxymoron........safe reproductive health ....".
You made that sentence by splicing bits of two different statements together, and then falsely attributed it to me.
I'm not sure what point you're trying to make with it.
Safe reproductive health care is not an oxymoron.
Despite the opposition of people like you, it is a reality, and always will be, if I have anything to say about it.

Sweety:mrgreen: ...the irony is that you point out what you to believe to be an oxymoron--that the life withing the womb can't be independant because if removed, death results....and yet, you call abortion "safe reproductive health care."

First: Abortion is ANTI reproduction.
Second: Abortion is not "SAFE" for the fetus.
Third: Abortion is disrupting a normal HEALTHY bodily function called pregnancy.

ERGO...abortion is neither SAFE, nor concerning REPRODUCTION, nor relevant for HEALTH--hence, an OXYMORON and IRONIC that people use those three words repeatedly to describe the "procedure" called abortion.
 
Who is "we"?
You and Doughgirl?
There are no significant "medical risks" (unlike with pregnancy and childbirth).
Ergo, you find it necessary to invent false ones ("Post-Traumatic Abortion Syndrome", "increased risk of breast cancer")..


perforated uterus...sepsis...infertility issues...increased risk of ectopic pregs...etc..:roll:
 
could you be any more patronisng?


Nobody is talking about the health risk to the foetus. Unless the issue of a nervous system/pain/stimulus responce thing is on the agenda, the health care is primarily about the woman, so stop being perdantic and brigning up points irrelavent to the debate.

and eptopic pregnanacies are a reason for abortion.

Plus, Post traumatic whatever you wanna call it is not a recognized form of depression and there haven't been any studies on it, none that I am aware of. I mean, did somebody just make it up?
 
could you be any more patronisng?


Nobody is talking about the health risk to the foetus. Unless the issue of a nervous system/pain/stimulus responce thing is on the agenda, the health care is primarily about the woman, so stop being perdantic and brigning up points irrelavent to the debate.

and eptopic pregnanacies are a reason for abortion.
The words are: pedantic and response and bringing and irrelevant and ectopic and pregnancies.

(spell check;) )


How’s that for patronizing?


BTW—the topic IS about both patients...re-read the OP as I have already suggested.
 
perforated uterus...sepsis...infertility issues...increased risk of ectopic pregs...etc..:roll:
In a way I hoping 1069 would have insisted on discussing her sh!t analogy.

What fun that could be!

Taking a sh!t = birth.
What is the sh!t equivalent to abortion?
An enema would be a late term abortion.....so early abortion would be what....gastric bypass?

No law is proposed which would dictate when women could have children, so there is no equivalent to telling men when they can sh!t.

There are regulations for when men can get an enema...like when it's *medically necessary* :doh ....but what kind of man seeks an elective enema when his bowels are working just fine and there is no medical necessity?

I think they call that a scat fetish.
So do PC women have a similar sexual fetish which drives them to abort?

***
Rape resulting in pregnancy would = the Taco Bell Chihuahua forcing a Chalupa up your asss......Oh, and check this out:



ROE v. WADE, Section 9a:
"A. The appellee and certain amici argue that sh!t is a "person" within the language and meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment. In support of this, they outline at length and in detail the well-known facts of fecal development. If this suggestion of personhood is established, the appellant's case, of course, collapses, [410 U.S. 113, 157] for the terd's right to life would then be guaranteed specifically by the Amendment. The appellant conceded as much on reargument. 51 On the other hand, the appellee conceded on reargument 52 that no case could be cited that holds that sh!t is a person within the meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment."
 
In a way I hoping 1069 would have insisted on discussing her sh!t analogy.

What fun that could be!

Taking a sh!t = birth.
What is the sh!t equivalent to abortion?
An enema would be a late term abortion.....so early abortion would be what....gastric bypass?

No law is proposed which would dictate when women could have children, so there is no equivalent to telling men when they can sh!t.

There are regulations for when men can get an enema...like when it's *medically necessary* :doh ....but what kind of man seeks an elective enema when his bowels are working just fine and there is no medical necessity?

I think they call that a scat fetish.
So do PC women have a similar sexual fetish which drives them to abort?

***
Rape resulting in pregnancy would = the Taco Bell Chihuahua forcing a Chalupa up your asss......Oh, and check this out: the terd's right to life
I'd give you a "thanks" on that, but it's just too so totally gross:hitsfan:
 
What a distracting picture:mrgreen:
 
Given the law in question it is my opinion that SD doctors should be required to make a statement to tell women verbally and in writing that abortion ends a human life,

Absolutely no woman going for an abortion is unaware of this.

could cause depression and suicide,

Lots of things, including *HAVING* the baby can cause this. Should we warn prospective mothers that *NOT* having an abortion can cause depression and suicide as well?

and ends a woman's constitutionally protected relationship with her unborn child.

You'll have to point out where in the Constitution it mentions unborn children because it simply doesn't exist.
 
The words are: pedantic and response and bringing and irrelevant and ectopic and pregnancies.

(spell check;) )


How’s that for patronizing?


BTW—the topic IS about both patients...re-read the OP as I have already suggested.



umm since when was a foetus or an embryo considered a patient?
and excuse me for having a social life on top of college a job home family etc but spelling on a forum is not my high priority list right now. Cep u make an excellent point.
 
You'll have to point out where in the Constitution it mentions unborn children because it simply doesn't exist.



The Constitution of the United States of America
We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.


posterity
One entry found for posterity.


Main Entry: pos·ter·i·ty
Pronunciation: pä-'ster-&-tE
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English posterite, from Anglo-French pusterité, from Latin posteritat-, posteritas, from posterus coming after
1 : the offspring of one progenitor to the furthest generation
2 : all future generations
 
(spell check )


How’s that for patronizing?

I don't much like to play "spelling/grammar cop" (it's a tedious game for me, since I have no serious rivals for the title of "linguistic expert").

So I don't call people out too often, except when I'm feeling particularly mischievous, or when I notice people erroneously attempting to call others out, as you just did.

So I'll call you out now.

On the basis of Nancyboy's posts, I'm guessing he/she is a resident of either the UK, Canada, or Australia.

"Patronising" is the correct English spelling of the word. That is the spelling that is used in the UK and in every other English-speaking country, with the exception of the United States, where we've bastardized ("stupidized", I like to say) the English language, which, in its original form, contains very few z's.

So.

Even if Nancyboy is in fact American, perhaps he or she just prefers to use correct English spellings, rather than their bastardized 20th Century-American equivalents.

If you're a teacher, you shouldn't have a problem with that.
Do you frequently correct your pupils when they are not wrong?

I'll admit Nancyboy left out an i (he/she wrote "patronisng").
It is reasonably probable, on the basis of the quality of his/her other writings, that the ommission of the i was a typo, rather than a true spelling error.

You, on the other hand, are making a spelling error- not to mention a rude, boorish, stereotypically American spectacle of yourself- when you insist on bastardized modern phonetic English spellings and ridicule those who prefer proper English spellings, old-fashioned though they might seem to you.

What's next? Are you going to ridicule nancy for writing "foetus" instead of "fetus"?

A hundred years from now, the Brits will still be writing "foetus", while the American equivalent will probably have evolved to "feetiss", or to whatever the heck we feel like.
 
So I'll call you out now.

On the basis of Nancyboy's posts, I'm guessing he/she is a resident of either the UK, Canada, or Australia.

"Patronising" is the correct English spelling of the word. That is the spelling that is used in the UK and in every other English-speaking country, with the exception of the United States, where we've bastardized ("stupidized", I like to say) the English language, which, in its original form, contains very few z's.

So.

Even if Nancyboy is in fact American, perhaps he or she just prefers to use correct English spellings, rather than their bastardized 20th Century-American equivalents.

I knew you couldn't resist...that's why I let that one hang out there....Of course I know there are variation in English spellings. Check again darlin' --even with the "s" rather than a "z"--he still inverted letters...So hoisted by your own petard, eh?!:mrgreen: :2wave: Baloney (oh my...should I spell that with a "gna" instead???:shock: ) You LOVE the grammar/spelling Nazi schtick.:roll: :2razz:
 
Absolutely no woman going for an abortion is unaware of this.

Hmm, I refer you to OKGranny's "it's just a part of her body" and "it's just a clump of cells" arguments. FutureIncoming, 1069, CoffieSaint, Thinker, Independent Thinker, Mikkel, Sissy-Boy, Dazed, Steen, and many other PC DP members make these arguments on a regular basis.

Lots of things, including *HAVING* the baby can cause this. Should we warn prospective mothers that *NOT* having an abortion can cause depression and suicide as well?

I reiterate:
If women are not being properly informed about their pregnancy then that is a problem which needs to be addressed. I had assumed that Planned Parenthood, Youth and Family Services and others had covered this information. If you know of any spicific failure of such programs to inform women on what I personally consider an essential part of basic sex-ed, please make it known.

You'll have to point out where in the Constitution it mentions unborn children because it simply doesn't exist.

The law in question refers to a natural relationship, a basic human right, which is protected by the woman's 1st, 4th,9th and 14th. Amendments. I refer you to the SD laws in question linked earlier in this thread.

Online debate is not specifically mentioned in the constitution either, yet it remains protected by the first amendment, so your line of argument is not logically sound.
 
I knew you couldn't resist...that's why I let that one hang out there....Of course I know there are variation in English spellings. Check again darlin' --even with the "s" rather than a "z"--he still inverted letters...So hoisted by your own petard, eh?!:mrgreen: :2wave: Baloney (oh my...should I spell that with a "gna" instead???:shock: ) You LOVE the grammar/spelling Nazi schtick.:roll: :2razz:

Ah...should have read the whole post--you mention the missing "i"---whaddeveh.....
 
Hey Ten....you have anything more to add to the oxymoronic irony of abortion being "safe reproductive health care?"
 
Hey Ten....you have anything more to add to the oxymoronic irony of abortion being "safe reproductive health care?"

In my opinion women should be allowed to abort their offspring through the 108th trimester.
 
Cheers ten. (haha yey pearl jam)
And if that didn't give it away, I'm from England. The boring 'norven' green part. I appolagise for my crappy spelling, mostly due to typos, i don't know what everyone else's times are set to but I am usually on here at rediculous hours of the morning and/or after consuming rediculous amounts of alcohol. Besides who checks spelling of a post. Plus it's doubley confusing because apart from spelling grammer things, laws are all different over here. attitudes and the like. Enough excuses.

Felicity, the safe part is refering to a safe procedure for the woman.
 
Cheers ten. ......after consuming rediculous amounts of alcohol. .
'splains it...thanks.:party :naughty :mrgreen: I'll be forgiving, then...as long as you don't call me names and such as you've been lately...'kay?;)
 
The Constitution of the United States of America
We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

None of which mentions the unborn or a mother's relationship with said unborn as Jerry claimed.

Do try again.
 
Back
Top Bottom