• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Warner’s Iraq Remarks Surprise White House (1 Viewer)

aps

Passionate
DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 25, 2005
Messages
15,675
Reaction score
2,979
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Liberal
Warner’s Iraq Remarks Surprise White House
By SHERYL GAY STOLBERG

WASHINGTON, Oct. 6 — The White House, caught off guard by a leading Republican senator who said the situation in Iraq was “drifting sideways,” responded cautiously on Friday, with a spokeswoman for President Bush stopping short of saying outright that Mr. Bush disagreed with the assessment.

“I don’t believe that the president thinks that way,” Dana Perino, the deputy White House press secretary, said when asked whether the president agreed with the senator, John Warner of Virginia. “I think that he believes that while it is tough going in Iraq, that slow progress is being made.”

Ms. Perino’s carefully worded response underscores the delicate situation that Mr. Warner, chairman of the Armed Services Committee, has created for the White House just one month before an election in which Mr. Bush has been trying to shift the national debate from the war in Iraq to the broader war on terror.

Speaking to reporters on Thursday after returning from a trip that included a one-day stop in Baghdad, Mr. Warner said the United States should consider “a change of course” if the violence there did not diminish soon. He did not specify what shift might be necessary, but said that the American military had done what it could to stabilize Iraq and that no policy options should be taken “off the table.” . . .

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/07/world/middleeast/07capital.html

Oh, George Bush disagrees with this assessment? Surprise surprise. Why would we ever think he would admit any sort of set back in Iraq? He is such an idiot, it makes me sick. Although I should be grateful, because it will be because of this war that the democrats will gain seats in both houses, and may they (the dems) take control of at least one house. Please, George Bush, keep saying how well things are going in Iraq, as the number of soldiers killed is more than the number of people killed on Septemer 11, 2001. Keep it up, Georgie boy.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom