Who said I'm necessarily arguing with you? I agree with you that a jury isn't necessary, but that also means investigators would need to be more disciplined when determining gang behavior and patterns. If they aren't, the results are misdemeanors being treated as violent criminal offenses.
More disciplined than what?
Depends on the game since this is really about MS-13 it depends on the rank in order to get a certain rank with the game you have to kill somebody.
Trying to defend your precious gangsters?
I know why I'm posting here
So entirely innocent people are being deported to what are essentially concentration camps, and you're happy with that?
I see you fell for the MS13 lies and photoshopped tattoos. No wonder Trump loves people like you; 'gullible' must be your middle name.
www.theguardian.com
www.cbsnews.com
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():focal(749x0:751x2)/donald-trump-terry-moran-tout-043025-bb56fd14c2764f5c8bc1e2361353ad0c.jpg)
The authorities must exercise more discipline when identifying gang members since there have been several instances of mistaken identification.
Several Venezuelans were deported to El Salvador instead of their home country because Venezuela refused to accept them. Eight Venezuelan women were sent to El Salvador after U.S. officials misled them into thinking they were being deported to Venezuela. Similarly, 238 Venezuelan men were transferred to El Salvador’s Terrorism Confinement Center (CECOT) under the Alien Enemies Act, despite 178 having no evident gang affiliation.
Good criminal activities I have more interested in I don't care about their lore
When were we having that conversation it seems like I wasn't participating in that.
I'm starting to wonder if you're participating in this thread.
Your question seems like you have forgot everything we've discussed to this point.
At this point, I am simply going to agree with one of your earlier statements. If immigration officers think like five-year-olds, they'll catch the most obvious of gang members.
So you make up nonsense and pretend I said it? What's the point of even talking to you?
Yeah. Now point out where I said immigration officers should think like this.
Yeah you're not agreeing with me I never said that. I said 5-year-olds could probably point this out to prove how ridiculous you were being.
And I rephrased it to point out how ridiculous you're being. Now we're even.
You rephrase that change the meeting to show how ridiculous you are so now you're 2 for 0.
If you say so...
Arguments you were having with yourself while you ignored everything I said
I corrected you over and over and over and over and over and over and over again while you insisted that everyone's arguing about it simply and then when you finally accept it you go right back to doing it again.
I started off with that point you wanted to bark about tattoos I had to point out several times that that's thought what it was about over and over and over again it's a pattern with you.
I said something you ignored it I said something again and you ignored it and I said it again and you ignored it. Over and over and over again.
Because that example should have been the clue I'm going to keep going back to it keep hammering you on it until you get it.
None. It's hearsay.
Maybe stop ignoring it
I've said it's not about the tattoos. The tattoos and affiliations were brought up by you, and I was providing rationale for cases where those are not enough evidence. You then brought up other factors, and I agreed with you other factors are important to establish a pattern.