Yeah, and there have been a million of them.The Messiah is mentioned countless times.
Again, your fellow experts on the Bible would be the people to ask.I asked for your headcount of the number of women who wrote the Bible. So that's one. And that's it.
Mary, the virgin mother of Jesus.
God The Father.
It's likely because your debate skills are like no others.All of those have embraced me and my Truth, long since.
Learning about the Bible through wiki?Yeah, and there have been a million of them.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Jewish_messiah_claimants
Don't you ever wonder why so many Jews seem to have missed or rejected your favorite one?
I know why. Ask me! Ask me!!
So you really don't understand how it works. Huh.How about we try and focus on legislation that was overturned by the FLSC or SCOTUS that deals with Governor Ron DeSantis and the Florida Legislature?
I don't follow that stuff, but @RaleBulgarian apparently does. From his message:Perhaps could share what legislation in FL signed by Governor DeSantis is currently under review by FLSC and/or SCOTUS.
I am fine here, taking turns with @Michael Cole at holding you by the scruff.Boy, you have a long list of things to do. Better get at them!
It's a scary question, isn't it. You wouldn't believe how many conservative Christians have fled from that simple question.You really should ask one of your many experts on the Bible in this thread. They claim to know it much better than me.
Yep. The Bible authors often tried to hide that, but it comes through very clearly.Excellent point. Afterall, per your own words, Jesus and God are both pro homosexual and pro abortion.
So you really don't understand how it works. Huh.
Well, the FL legislature does. That's why they write crooked laws, knowing it could take years before the SC tosses them.
I don't follow that stuff, but @RaleBulgarian apparently does. From his message:
An appeals court finds Florida's social media law unconstitutional
May 23, 2022 4:42 PM ET
Florida law intended to punish social media platforms such as Facebook and Twitter is an unconstitutional violation of the First Amendment, a federal appeals court ruled Monday, dealing a major victory to companies who had been accused by GOP Gov. Ron DeSantis of discriminating against conservative thought.
A three-judge panel of the Atlanta-based 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously concluded that it was overreach for DeSantis and the Republican-led Florida Legislature to tell the social media companies how to conduct their work under the Constitution's free speech guarantee.
https://www.npr.org/2022/05/23/1100...da-social-media-law-unconstitutional-desantis
I am fine here, taking turns with @Michael Cole at holding you by the scruff.
We're bored. You make us happy.
His Word is the Truth, no doubt about that.Yep. The Bible authors often tried to hide that, but it comes through very clearly.
No one can stop God from telling us the Truth, you know.
I always find the term "Conservative Christian" to be redundant. If you're a Christian, i.e. a follower of Christ, then you would "conserve" His teachings.It's a scary question, isn't it. You wouldn't believe how many conservative Christians have fled from that simple question.
It makes the earth quiver and quake beneath your feet.
https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/25/politics/desantis-trump-strategy/index.htmlAs I've shown in a couple of posts, Ron DeSantis has been very tactful in his criticism of Donald Trump, saying that he did a great job for 3 years and then giving an example of where he failed miserably.
Legality is based on constitutionality.I would think that "legal" is the common denominator between the two words.
“Valid” (constitutional) and “in effect” are distinctions with a difference when discussing laws.To my knowledge, and correct me if I'm worng here, but once legislation is handed to the Governor of the State to sign off on, it becomes the law of that State until further actions invalidates it.
Yours, and my own, opinions are irrelevant to the validity/unconstitutionality of any law.I dobut that opponents really care about the Constituion.
Replacing my NPR reference with an older The Verge reference is poor form.A higher court Judges ruling only temporarily invalidates the legislation. I don't know if the State of FL is appealing the ruling, but Ron DeSantis did point to a Texas law to make his case.
Texas passes law that bans kicking people off social media based on ‘viewpoint’
Florida passed a law with similar goals earlier this year.www.theverge.com
I showed the exact words that DeSantis had used in his praise and criticism of Donald Trump. CNN is using their own words. Ron DeSantis knows that he needs the Trump vote, and will be very careful about alienating them.https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/25/politics/desantis-trump-strategy/index.html
DeSantis – whose campaign raised $8.2 million in the first 24 hours, according to a campaign spokesperson – has filled the hours after his botched Twitter launch by taking his message to the familiar comforts of the conservative airwaves, where, in a dozen interviews, he has assailed Trump as fiscally irresponsible and a supporter of amnesty for undocumented immigrants. He said Trump’s Covid-19 mitigation policies “destroyed millions of people’s lives” and told Fox News his “day one” priority would be to fire the former president’s handpicked FBI director, Christopher Wray.
But DeSantis will have to hit much harder than that, else he's a weakling.... and loses.
And when he hits harder, he alienates all the Trump loyalists... and loses.
God is definitely anti-DeSantis, just like all moral and patriotic Americans.
Acknowledging that you have no valid argument.Back to this book that you refuse to read:
I'm a freethinker. The FFs will have to fall where they will.Since you approve of them being pro choice, I would think that you;d approve of the FF's being pro slavery.
"Challenged" is the keyword here. Most laws passed by the FL legislature and signed off by Gov. DeSantis haven't been challenged or found unconstitutional.Legality is based on constitutionality.
When a law is challenged and found to be unconstitutional, it is illegal.
Supreme Court Puts Off Considering State Laws Curbing Internet Platforms
The Supreme Court asked the Biden administration on Monday for its views on whether the Constitution allows Florida and Texas to prevent large social media companies from removing posts based on the views they express.
So no final decision has been made. Sounds like a plus for FL.The practical effect of the move was to put off a decision on whether to hear two major First Amendment challenges to the states’ laws for at least several months. If the court ends up granting review, as seems likely, it will hear arguments no earlier than October and will probably not issue a decision until next year.
The smart set is ganging up on you?You might want to talk to your allies who claim that they're experts on the Bible and have them explain that one to you.
One or two pretending to be many. Same ole method, different forum.The smart set is ganging up on you?
Well, consider why.
Wiki is The Word.Learning about the Bible through wiki?
LOL Another law that addresses a non-existent problem AND is an illegal attempt to control corporations by the State. People are kicked of social media for violating the terms of service which are agreed to by users when they sign up. AFAIK no social media company includes "viewpoint" in their terms of service and therefore no one has ever been banned for that.I would think that "legal" is the common denominator between the two words.
To my knowledge, and correct me if I'm worng here, but once legislation is handed to the Governor of the State to sign off on, it becomes the law of that State until further actions invalidates it.
I dobut that opponents really care about the Constituion. Isn't it great news that Ron DeSantis put yet ANOTHER conservative Justice on the Florida Supreme Court?
A higher court Judges ruling only temporarily invalidates the legislation. I don't know if the State of FL is appealing the ruling, but Ron DeSantis did point to a Texas law to make his case.
Texas passes law that bans kicking people off social media based on ‘viewpoint’
Florida passed a law with similar goals earlier this year.www.theverge.com
I like how he thinks the Word is the Bible.Wiki is The Word.
Well, it's the ... you know... normal perspective. But I'm glad you find it interesting. I guess.So that's how it works? Interesting perspective on the subject.
Beats me. I leave the details to Wiki.About that Texas law that was the basis for the FL law on internet censorship: Has that legislation been overturned? If not, then if DeSantis is appealing the case, he might have a good chance of winning it in a higher court.
Do you have a running list of all FL laws signed into effect by DeSantis, and a corresponding list of those that have been challenged?"Challenged" is the keyword here. Most laws passed by the FL legislature and signed off by Gov. DeSantis haven't been challenged or found unconstitutional.
Ask SCOTUS.Why would SCOTUS ask the Biden Adminstration about a law that was temporarily overturned by a Judge in FL?
You consider it “a plus for FL” that yet another completely bias based, dubious law signed into effect has been blocked?So no final decision has been made. Sounds like a plus for FL.
Yep. It's a shame so many have become confused about where we can find That Word.His Word is the Truth, no doubt about that.
And yet you don't give all your money to the poor, as Jesus instructed.I always find the term "Conservative Christian" to be redundant. If you're a Christian, i.e. a follower of Christ, then you would "conserve" His teachings.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?