• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

[W;622]Please... Be honest. Do you really think a second impeachment is good for the country?

The will of the people was to elect Biden. He won by a mile.
What proof is there that Biden's win was a mile's win by the will of the people?:rolleyes:
 
AOC just said it's necessary to restrict the freedom of the press. Is AOC a fascist? Hum?
It is necessary to restrict the freedom of the press.


You disagree?
 
The leader of the nation told his supporters that if they get violent he will support them.


Another guy with a small moustache also said that once

Buffalo horn guy arrested for storming the Capitol said he did only what Trump asked him to do.
 
Yet, every judge allows circumstancial evidence into their courtrooms that may convict or exonerate a defendant.:rolleyes:
That's nice.


No judge in America believes you
 
Buffalo horn guy arrested for storming the Capitol said he did only what Trump asked him to do.
ANTIFA who disrupted outdoor restaurant goers in Washington, DC said they did that because their college professors convinced them that 'white privilege' was toxic. You gonna blame college professors for all their propaganda? You should, ya know.
 
Yet, every judge allows circumstancial evidence into their courtrooms that may convict or exonerate a defendant.:rolleyes:
Affidavits don't rise to even the level of circumstantial evidence.
 
ANTIFA who disrupted outdoor restaurant goers in Washington, DC said they did that because their college professors convinced them that 'white privilege' was toxic. You gonna blame college professors for all their propaganda? You should, ya know.
They did? Prove it
 
That's nice.


No judge in America believes you
Every judge allows circumstancial evidence into their courtrooms to possibly convict or exonerate a defendant except judges don't allow circumstancial evidence to determine whether an election was free and fair.

Why aren't judges consistent? Is circumstancial evidence allowable or not?

For that matter, why did you applaud circumstancial evidence to investigate the Trump campaign after the result of the 2016 election?? Hum?
 
Every judge allows circumstancial evidence into their courtrooms to possibly convict or exonerate a defendant except judges don't allow circumstancial evidence to determine whether an election was free and fair.

Why aren't judges consistent? Is circumstancial evidence allowable or not?

For that matter, why did you applaud circumstancial evidence to investigate the Trump campaign after the result of the 2016 election?? Hum?
No judge in America has ruled voter fraud happened. Because it didnt. You had over 60 chances to make your case. Some in front of judges APPOINTED BY TRUMP. No one believes you. Not even the Republican party.


It's over. Move on
 
The score
The ballot score? How do we know all ballots were from qualified-to-vote Americans who can vote just one time? Besides, any tin pot dictator will demand someone prove their election wasn't democratic. I know that Jimmy Carter, for example, doesn't think that a ballot casting automatically means a democratic vote.:rolleyes:
 
The ballot score? How do we know all ballots were from qualified-to-vote Americans who can vote just one time? Besides, any tin pot dictator will demand someone prove their election wasn't democratic. I know that Jimmy Carter, for example, doesn't think that a ballot casting automatically means a democratic vote.:rolleyes:
Because the trump administration said this was the most fair election in our lives
 
So no proof? Ok thanks
The name they wanted to be said was Briana and their meaning was the cops go out of their ways to kill blacks. Does that narrow it down for ya?:ROFLMAO:
 
I have no idea what Chuck Schumer has been doing screaming for the current Senate to take up the Impeachment trial:
- first, Chuckie will have two more DEM Senators when the Senate assembles again
- Second, the House Impeachment team needs to assemble their case. That does not happen overnight Chuckie

I swear to GOD Chuck Schumer is the embodiment of "useless as tits on a bull". Mitch is trying to save you from yourself Chuckie.
 
The name they wanted to be said was Briana and their meaning was the cops go out of their ways to kill blacks. Does that narrow it down for ya?:ROFLMAO:
Does not prove your point. So no evidence. Ok thanks
 
Because the trump administration said this was the most fair election in our lives
The most fair election w/o an investigation. There were ample evidences of irregularities in the 2020 election...There were more evidences of irregularities in the 2020 election than in the 2016 election (which was...psst...investigated).:rolleyes:
 
The most fair election w/o an investigation. There were ample evidences of irregularities in the 2020 election...There were more evidences of irregularities in the 2020 election than in the 2016 election (which as...psst...investigated).:rolleyes:
No judge in America believes you. In 2016 REPUBLICANS called for an investigation. They don't want one now

It's over. Move on
 
He did? He told them to go up there and break in the capitol, take over the government and by any means necessary?
I know that's what you believe, but where's the concrete evidence for your belief?

Why did they attack the capitol?
 
No judge in America believes you. In 2916 REPUBLICANS called for an investigation. They don't want one now

It's over. Move on
Yes sir, Mr. Authoritarian, sir.:rolleyes:
 
Back
Top Bottom