- Joined
- Apr 29, 2013
- Messages
- 22,637
- Reaction score
- 2,295
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
What proof is there that Biden's win was a mile's win by the will of the people?The will of the people was to elect Biden. He won by a mile.
What proof is there that Biden's win was a mile's win by the will of the people?The will of the people was to elect Biden. He won by a mile.
It is necessary to restrict the freedom of the press.AOC just said it's necessary to restrict the freedom of the press. Is AOC a fascist? Hum?
The leader of the nation told his supporters that if they get violent he will support them.
Another guy with a small moustache also said that once
Yet, every judge allows circumstancial evidence into their courtrooms that may convict or exonerate a defendant.No judge in America believes you
That's nice.Yet, every judge allows circumstancial evidence into their courtrooms that may convict or exonerate a defendant.
ANTIFA who disrupted outdoor restaurant goers in Washington, DC said they did that because their college professors convinced them that 'white privilege' was toxic. You gonna blame college professors for all their propaganda? You should, ya know.Buffalo horn guy arrested for storming the Capitol said he did only what Trump asked him to do.
Affidavits don't rise to even the level of circumstantial evidence.Yet, every judge allows circumstancial evidence into their courtrooms that may convict or exonerate a defendant.
They did? Prove itANTIFA who disrupted outdoor restaurant goers in Washington, DC said they did that because their college professors convinced them that 'white privilege' was toxic. You gonna blame college professors for all their propaganda? You should, ya know.
The scoreWhat proof is there that Biden's win was a mile's win by the will of the people?
Every judge allows circumstancial evidence into their courtrooms to possibly convict or exonerate a defendant except judges don't allow circumstancial evidence to determine whether an election was free and fair.That's nice.
No judge in America believes you
The words shouted over and over again by the protestors at the outdoor restaurants were, 'Say her name.'They did? Prove it
No judge in America has ruled voter fraud happened. Because it didnt. You had over 60 chances to make your case. Some in front of judges APPOINTED BY TRUMP. No one believes you. Not even the Republican party.Every judge allows circumstancial evidence into their courtrooms to possibly convict or exonerate a defendant except judges don't allow circumstancial evidence to determine whether an election was free and fair.
Why aren't judges consistent? Is circumstancial evidence allowable or not?
For that matter, why did you applaud circumstancial evidence to investigate the Trump campaign after the result of the 2016 election?? Hum?
So no proof? Ok thanksThe words shouted over and over again by the protestors at the outdoor restaurants were, "Say her name.'
The ballot score? How do we know all ballots were from qualified-to-vote Americans who can vote just one time? Besides, any tin pot dictator will demand someone prove their election wasn't democratic. I know that Jimmy Carter, for example, doesn't think that a ballot casting automatically means a democratic vote.The score
Because the trump administration said this was the most fair election in our livesThe ballot score? How do we know all ballots were from qualified-to-vote Americans who can vote just one time? Besides, any tin pot dictator will demand someone prove their election wasn't democratic. I know that Jimmy Carter, for example, doesn't think that a ballot casting automatically means a democratic vote.
The name they wanted to be said was Briana and their meaning was the cops go out of their ways to kill blacks. Does that narrow it down for ya?So no proof? Ok thanks
Does not prove your point. So no evidence. Ok thanksThe name they wanted to be said was Briana and their meaning was the cops go out of their ways to kill blacks. Does that narrow it down for ya?
The most fair election w/o an investigation. There were ample evidences of irregularities in the 2020 election...There were more evidences of irregularities in the 2020 election than in the 2016 election (which was...psst...investigated).Because the trump administration said this was the most fair election in our lives
No judge in America believes you. In 2016 REPUBLICANS called for an investigation. They don't want one nowThe most fair election w/o an investigation. There were ample evidences of irregularities in the 2020 election...There were more evidences of irregularities in the 2020 election than in the 2016 election (which as...psst...investigated).
It definitely narrows it down if you can think abstractly, yes.Does not prove your point. So no evidence. Ok thanks
He did? He told them to go up there and break in the capitol, take over the government and by any means necessary?
I know that's what you believe, but where's the concrete evidence for your belief?
Yes sir, Mr. Authoritarian, sir.No judge in America believes you. In 2916 REPUBLICANS called for an investigation. They don't want one now
It's over. Move on
No it doesnt. So no evidence. ThanksIt definitely narrows it down if you can think abstractly, yes.
Good. About time you move onYes sir, Mr. Authoritarian, sir.