• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

[W:#473]Now that Joe Biden’s president, the Times finally admits: Hunter’s laptop is real

The emails were authenticated. That doesn't mean the laptop is authentic. They qualify even that much with "it appears."

That said, if you can stick him or Biden with something has at it. Feed them to each other.
Hunter's media appearances were pretty convincing that he knows it was his laptop.
 
The lefties always scream conspiracy theory on so many fronts

Now the NYT wakes up and say's Wow, .......

The media is so in the tank and covered this up to the max

Lock em up

============================================

Forgive the profanity, but you have got to be s–tting us.

First, the New York Times decides more than a year later that Hunter Biden’s business woes are worthy of a story. Then, deep in the piece, in passing, it notes that Hunter’s laptop is legitimate.

“People familiar with the investigation said prosecutors had examined emails between Mr. Biden, Mr. Archer and others about Burisma and other foreign business activity,” the Times writes. “Those emails were obtained by The New York Times from a cache of files that appears to have come from a laptop abandoned by Mr. Biden in a Delaware repair shop. The email and others in the cache were authenticated by people familiar with them and with the investigation.”

Authenticated!!! You don’t say. You mean, when a newspaper actually does reporting on a topic and doesn’t just try to whitewash coverage for Joe Biden, it discovers it’s actually true?


Propagandists are as propagandists do.
 
Whether that's true or not, and I am not convinced it is, Biden wasn't president when this alleged activity took place.

With all the shit Trump and his WH family took part in while he WAS president, I doubt Biden has too much to worry about.
Biden was in the White House when it happened and personally tapped by the President as the chief diplomat in the region. If Joe Biden didn't have any power to influence the US then Hunter Biden wouldn't have been paid in diamonds to broker meetings with "The Big Guy." The only value a corrupt crackhead with no relevant business experience and who doesn't speak their language has with these businesses and Oligarchs is the presumed ability to broker political favors under the table. Burisma didn't just have Hunter on their payroll, they had influencers in Russian as well. That was part of their business model to gain protection from key foreign nations.
 
Last edited:
But you apparently voted for his father who IMO has done almost as bad job
in his current position as he obviously did in raising & fathering Hunter!
That's all this is, is another way to say you don't like Biden.
 
The left scream about "debunked Russian disinformation" for two years, now claim they don't care and neither should you.
 
The lefties always scream conspiracy theory on so many fronts

Now the NYT wakes up and say's Wow, .......

The media is so in the tank and covered this up to the max

Lock em up

============================================

Forgive the profanity, but you have got to be s–tting us.

First, the New York Times decides more than a year later that Hunter Biden’s business woes are worthy of a story. Then, deep in the piece, in passing, it notes that Hunter’s laptop is legitimate.

“People familiar with the investigation said prosecutors had examined emails between Mr. Biden, Mr. Archer and others about Burisma and other foreign business activity,” the Times writes. “Those emails were obtained by The New York Times from a cache of files that appears to have come from a laptop abandoned by Mr. Biden in a Delaware repair shop. The email and others in the cache were authenticated by people familiar with them and with the investigation.”

Authenticated!!! You don’t say. You mean, when a newspaper actually does reporting on a topic and doesn’t just try to whitewash coverage for Joe Biden, it discovers it’s actually true?


So the Times admitted it, but we can only see this Admission on the Post?

LOL. Dismissed.
 
The left scream about "debunked Russian disinformation" for two years, now claim they don't care and neither should you.

Give me a reason to care.
 
Biden was in the White House when it happened and personally tapped by the President as the chief diplomat in the region. If Joe Biden didn't have any power to influence the US then Hunter Biden wouldn't have been paid in diamonds to broker meetings with "The Big Guy." The only value a corrupt crackhead with no relevant business experience and who doesn't speak their language has with these businesses and Oligarchs is the presumed ability to broker political favors under the table. Burisma didn't just have Hunter on their payroll, they had influencers in Russian as well. That was part of their business model to gain protection from key foreign nations.

Biden was not in office for four years during the investigation.
 
Hmm… what difference, at this point, does it make? ;)

It was only important to falsely declare the laptop’s content to be Russian disinformation until after the 2020 election.
This is what the left does. Cover up and later when the truth comes out say “old news and who cares”
 
Authenticated!!! You don’t say. You mean, when a newspaper actually does reporting on a topic and doesn’t just try to whitewash coverage for Joe Biden, it discovers it’s actually true?
You got it right, Vy.
The NYT needs a story it can point to and be able to say, "We got it right. Hunter really is a useless POS."
 
It's utterly disgusting what happened in October of 2020!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

John Brennan was up to his neck in it! And no, it wasn't Russia interfering but it sure as h@ll was the CIA, U.S. media, facebook, twitter, Biden and more!

“If we are right, this is Russia trying to influence how Americans vote in this election, and we believe strongly that Americans need to be aware of this,” the signers added."


 
This is what the left does. Cover up and later when the truth comes out say “old news and who cares”
Sort of like Hillary finally getting nailed (but covered up) for fabricating evidence against Trump because she was afraid of getting beaten by a real estate developer with no political experience.
Sort of like Comey declaring Hillary mishandled Top Secret classified data but choosing not to prosecute her because, after all, she was destined to beat Trump in 2016.
 
This is what the left does. Cover up and later when the truth comes out say “old news and who cares”
That's exactly right. They go to any and all lengths with their own unethical and nefarious tactics, they form a complete lie of a narrative, they all rally around the lie in complete unity, and then they do what you described. It's ugly, upon ugly, upon ugly. It's despicable!
 
That's exactly right. They go to any and all lengths with their own unethical and nefarious tactics, they form a complete lie of a narrative, they all rally around the lie in complete unity, and then they do what you described. It's ugly, upon ugly, upon ugly. It's despicable!

Yep, but it’s legal and effective.
 
That's exactly right. They go to any and all lengths with their own unethical and nefarious tactics, they form a complete lie of a narrative, they all rally around the lie in complete unity, and then they do what you described. It's ugly, upon ugly, upon ugly. It's despicable!
Who are you talking about here - Democrats? Republicans? Trump supporters? All of the above?
 
That's exactly right. They go to any and all lengths with their own unethical and nefarious tactics, they form a complete lie of a narrative, they all rally around the lie in complete unity, and then they do what you described. It's ugly, upon ugly, upon ugly. It's despicable!
Get a indictment or...yaaaaaawn
 
Sort of like Hillary finally getting nailed (but covered up) for fabricating evidence against Trump because she was afraid of getting beaten by a real estate developer with no political experience.
Sort of like Comey declaring Hillary mishandled Top Secret classified data but choosing not to prosecute her because, after all, she was destined to beat Trump in 2016.
You make the right sound so weak and powerless
 
Back
Top Bottom