- Joined
- Mar 21, 2012
- Messages
- 40,615
- Reaction score
- 9,087
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Re: Native American Vietnam Veteran Speaks Out After MAGA Hat-Wearing Teens Harass Him
As usual you provide nothing of substance in reply.
It is sad that you can see in the video that it was the NA group that approached the kids group and are thus the ones who initiated the contact, yet still want to place blame on the kids because they responded to it. Whether you like the kids response or not, and whether their response was actually meant to mock or not, is irrelevant to the point that the NA group instigated the contact, and, that the NA male getting into the kids face shows further antagonism and makes him the blame for that, not the kid. What is even more telling about that specific is that the kid was smiling in a friendly manner when the NA male approached. That smiled changed when it became apparent to him the NA male wasn't being friendly.
So even if you are correct that the kids were mocking, you could lay blame with the kids for that, but it was a response, and the NA group holds more of the blame for the contact between the two.
1.) seen them and many more
2.) they factually dont change my stance because theres no logical reason for them to and nothing factually in them that matters to my stance/statements
3.) i dont lean left
4.) i factually dont dismiss them or ignore that at all theres simple nothing in them that impacts my stance and the statements i made. Like i said Im glad the school condemn these punks and i hope more school and parent punishment follows
if you disagree with that by all means PLEASE share what factual reality you speak of that should change my stance and anything i actually said id love to read it . .
As usual you provide nothing of substance in reply.
It is sad that you can see in the video that it was the NA group that approached the kids group and are thus the ones who initiated the contact, yet still want to place blame on the kids because they responded to it. Whether you like the kids response or not, and whether their response was actually meant to mock or not, is irrelevant to the point that the NA group instigated the contact, and, that the NA male getting into the kids face shows further antagonism and makes him the blame for that, not the kid. What is even more telling about that specific is that the kid was smiling in a friendly manner when the NA male approached. That smiled changed when it became apparent to him the NA male wasn't being friendly.
So even if you are correct that the kids were mocking, you could lay blame with the kids for that, but it was a response, and the NA group holds more of the blame for the contact between the two.