• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

[W:424]Parkland Students' Gun Control Proposal Is Beyond Radical


You could never keep up with me at the range. Lol
 
Gotta love when you start resorting to childish names to try to make your point. :lol:

I will look forward to you taking issue with the numerous lefties who refer to gun owners as

Gun Rubbers

Gun Nuts

Gun fetishists
 
without trolling, WTF does this mean?

I find it ludicrous to believe someone actually changes their position on the second amendment based on one nutcase
 
Yeah gun owners. But on another recent thread you weren't for confiscation. Remember I said you can't have it both ways? And no I'm not going back years to cite examples.

Ok. I guess you want violent felons to have guns.


Noted
 
For someone that doesn't trust the government your sure ready to bend over and take it or drop to your knees.

Are you gay?

It's ok if you are
 
I will look forward to you taking issue with the numerous lefties who refer to gun owners as

Gun Rubbers

Gun Nuts

Gun fetishists

Lead by example. :thumbs:
 
Im not disputing that there is already plenty of laws that exist. I also will not disagree that they go to far. My question was just to figure out where your at.

I would point out that no other right is absolute. You csn not slsnder someone without legal reprecussions but at the same time the 2A is the only right that clearly states it may not be infringed upon.

That said its kind of sticky because i dont think anyone would be ok with someone amassing weapons of mass destruction as a protected right.

Imo there needs to be some very specifically defined limitations that make sense.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 
You forgot AmmoSexuals just mentioning.

oh yeah, and I use Bannerrhoid on politicians and a movement. I don't call individual posters that. Yet I am constantly called a "gun rubber" etc. It is mainly from people who are patently dishonest as to what motivates their anti gun agenda
 
oh yeah, and I use Bannerrhoid on politicians and a movement. I don't call individual posters that. Yet I am constantly called a "gun rubber" etc. It is mainly from people who are patently dishonest as to what motivates their anti gun agenda
It was this thread or another one today that I was referred to as an Ammosexual I believe by the big V,though in fairness it could have been someone else. Actually I found it and it was in reference to all of us by our little friend.
 
Last edited:
It was this thread or another one today that I was referred to as an Ammosexual I believe by the big V,though in fairness it could have been someone else.

Is bannerhoid ok? Will you speak out against it?



Please. Lol
 
You seem to know an awful lot about the subject so it is ok if you are,I won't think less of you since it's not my bailiwick.

I support your gay lifestyle
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…