• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

[W:422] So, marriage is destroyed, right?

Craig234

DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 22, 2019
Messages
58,294
Reaction score
29,634
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Progressive
For years, Republicans ran against gay marriage equality - they used the issue to get Republican voters out.

The message from the activists and practically all Republican politicians was the same: gay marriage marriage equality would destroy the institution of marriage. If you liked marriage, if you liked children, you had to protect marriage by opposing gay marriage equality.

It's interesting to review this as a typical example of a Republican politicization of an issue, now that we have some more history.

I considered pulling up a long list of quotes, but I'll stick with the Republican Senate Majority leader as typical: "Will activist judges not elected by the American people destroy the institution of marriage, or will the people protect marriage as the best way to raise children? My vote is with the people."

That's what he said when Bush's effort to pass a constitutional amendment prohibiting gay marriage failed to get the 60 required votes. Republicans voted 45-6 in favor of the amendment - support for banning gay marriage in the constitution had overwhelming Republican support int he Senate and elsewhere.

So, how are those claims of nearly the entire party holding up now, that the institution of marriage would be destroyed, made so loudly for so many years? It'd be nice if Republicans voters could learn a little something from examples like this about the false, misguided hyperbole the Republican leaders to get votes.
 
What difference does it make! The Homosexual agenda won that round.

What deviant behavior do you want legalized now?
 
What difference does it make! The Homosexual agenda won that round.

What deviant behavior do you want legalized now?

Did your marriage fall apart?
 
What difference does it make! The Homosexual agenda won that round.

What deviant behavior do you want legalized now?

Whoosh.

The topic is, were Republicans telling the truth or a lie claiming for years that the institution of marriage would be destroyed, and protecting marriage and raising children required banning gay marriage equality? Were they right, or lying to get bigots' votes for their plutocracy agenda?
 

It's law...wth do you want now?
 
After all that drama, like 4 gay people got married.
 
It's law...wth do you want now?

For you to learn something from years of Republicans lying. Do you agree that Republicans lied for years that gay marriage equality would destroy marriage, to get votes from people like you? Or are you in denial, saying la-la-la-la-la-la about the issue now, while having supported their false claim?
 

Unlike those on the Left, I have my own opinions and don't rely on Pols to tell me how and what to think.
 
It is part of a larger agenda to destroy decency in this country. It's yet another cog in identity politics to boot.

Opinion noted and dismissed
 

In exactly the same way the Internet was destroyed by rolling back net neutrality rules, sure. :shrug:

Fearmongering is what fearmongers do.
 
After all that drama, like 4 gay people got married.

Nearly three years ago, over one million gay Americans were married. Would you mind pointing me to one honest post you have made?
 
Unlike those on the Left, I have my own opinions and don't rely on Pols to tell me how and what to think.

And yet they all come directly from Trump. Strange how every conservative is a free thinker who, completely on his own, comes up with the exact same opinion.
 
20 years ago, Bill Clinton signed Defense of Marriage Act - Washington Times



The point here is not so much about how Democratic politicians are hypocritical, as how much every politician...no matter what their Party...will tell the particular people they are talking to what they want to hear. To get votes.
 
And yet they all come directly from Trump. Strange how every conservative is a free thinker who, completely on his own, comes up with the exact same opinion.

They don't call us "the Right" for nothing.
 
Unlike those on the Left, I have my own opinions and don't rely on Pols to tell me how and what to think.

Nonetheless, it's a fact what Republican politicians almost universally said. So, since you have opinions, what is your opinion on whether their claims that gay may marriage equality would destroy marriage were true, or lies to get votes from people like you?
 
In exactly the same way the Internet was destroyed by rolling back net neutrality rules, sure. :shrug:

First of all, the claims aren't the same. Second of all, net neutrality hasn't been dismantled. The courts preserved states' rights to keep it, and California as usual has led the nation with the strongest net neutrality law.
 
What difference does it make! The Homosexual agenda won that round.

What deviant behavior do you want legalized now?


I guess you think that marriage legalizes sex between the married parties that otherwise would be illegal, but that's not true. Nonetheless, same-sex marriage is an accepted standard in the US based on SCOTUS decision and thus is not, by definition, deviant behavior. It may be deviant behavior to YOU, but then so might dancing or eating raw fish.
 
First of all, the claims aren't the same. Second of all, net neutrality hasn't been dismantled. The courts preserved states' rights to keep it, and California as usual has led the nation with the strongest net neutrality law.

Of course they're the same. They're not different just to be less inconvenient to your political preferences.

I know, I know; it's not "fearmongering" when Democrats do it. I expected nothing else from you.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…